A survey of shape variation in keratinized labial teeth of anuran larvae as related to phylogeny and ecology

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 609-625

  Vera Candioti, M Florencia ^a   Altig, Ronald ^b  

^a FUNDACIÓN MIGUEL LILLO   (Argentina)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Basal tadpoles; Canonical phylogenetic ordination; Curvature; Ecomorphological guilds; Eigenshape analysis; Head; Hyloides; Ranoides; Sheath

Indexed keywords

ECOMORPHOLOGY; EIGENVALUE; FROG; GUILD; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; LARVA; ORDINATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SHAPE; TAXONOMY; TOOTH;

HYLOIDEA; RANOIDEA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77958595161     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01509.x     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Altig R. 2006. Discussions of the origin and evolution of the oral apparatus of anuran tadpoles. Acta Herpetologica 2: 95-105.
2. Altig R. 2007. A primer for the morphology of anuran tadpoles. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 2: 71-74.
3. Altig R, Johnston GF. 1989. Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies and habits. Herpetological Monographs 3: 81-109.
4. Altig R, Lathrop A, Murphy RW. 2009. Morphology of Southeast Asian tadpoles: Hoplobatrachus chinensis (Dicroglossidae), Leptolalax pelodytoides (Megophryidae), and other megophryids. Russian Journal of Herpetology 16: 126-130.
5. Altig R, McDiarmid RW. 1999a. Body plan: development and morphology. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, eds. Tadpoles: the biology of Anuran larvae. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 24-51.
6. Altig R, McDiarmid RW. 1999b. Diversity: familial and generic characterization. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, eds. Tadpoles: the biology of Anuran larvae. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 295-337.
7. Altig R, Pace WL. 1974. Scanning electron photomicrographs of tadpole labial teeth. Journal of Herpetology 8: 247-251.
8. Barrionuevo JS. 2009. Análisis filogenético de las especies del grupo meridional del género Telmatobius (Anura: Ceratophryidae). DPhil. Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.
9. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P. 1992. Partialing out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
10. Borteiro C, Kolenc F, Tedros M, Prigioni C. 2006. The tadpole of Chaunus dorbignyi (Duméril & Bibron) (Anura, Bufonidae). Zootaxa 1308: 49-62.
11. Bresler J. 1954. The development of labial teeth of salientian larvae in relation to temperature. Copeia 1954: 207-211.
12. Briggs DEG, Crowther PR. 2003. Paleobiology II. Cornwall, United Kingdom: Blackwell Science Ltd.
13. Catalano SA, Goloboff PA, Giannini NP. 2010. Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework. Cladistics. doi 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00302.x.
14. Cei JM. 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore zoologico italiano, Monografía 2: XII-609.
15. Drewes RC, Altig R, Howell KM. 1989. Tadpoles of three frog species endemic to the forests of the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Amphibia-Reptilia 10: 435-443.
16. Dubois A. 1995. Keratodont formulae in anuran tadpoles: proposals for a standardization. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 33: 1-15.
17. Dujardin L, Duriez T. 1995. A mathematical model for the shape of the hooks of cestodae. Acta Biotheoretica 43: 217-225.
18. Echeverría DD. 1997. Microanatomy of the oral apparatus and oral cavity of Hyla minutus Peters, 1872 larvae (Anura, Hylidae), with data on feeding habits. Alytes 15: 26-36.
19. Fabrezi M. 2001. Variación morfológica de la dentición en anuros. Cuadernos de Herpetología 15: 17-28.
20. Fabrezi M, Emerson SB. 2003. Parallelism and convergence in anuran fangs. Journal of Zoology 260: 41-61.
21. Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294: 1-240.
22. Fiorito de López LE, Echeverría DD. 1984. Morfogénesis de los dientes larvales y pico córneo de Bufo arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Zoología 13: 573-578.
23. Fiorito de López LE, Echeverría DD. 1989. Microanatomía e histogénesis del aparato bucal en las larvas de Bufo arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae). Cuadernos de Herpetología 4: 4-10.
24. Freeman PW, Lemen C. 2007. An experimental approach to modeling the strength of canine teeth. Journal of Zoology 271: 162-169.
25. Frost DR. 2009. Amphibian Species of the World: an online reference version 5.3 (12 February, 2009). Electronic database available at: (accessed March 2010) American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY.
26. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, De Sá R, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1-370.
27. Funk VA, Specht CD. 2007. Meta-trees: grafting for a global perspective. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 120: 232-240.
28. Geerinckx T, De Poorter J, Adriaens D. 2007. Morphology and development of teeth and epidermal brushes in loricariid catfishes. Journal of Morphology 268: 805-814.
29. Giannini NP. 2003. Canonical phylogenetic ordination. Systematic Biology 52: 684-695.
30. Goloboff PA. 2003. Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity. Cladistics 19: 91-103.
31. Gosner KL. 1959. Systematic variations in tadpole teeth with notes on food. Herpetologica 15: 203-210.
32. Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183-190.
33. Grant T, Frost DR, Caldwell JP, Gagliardo R, Haddad CFB, Kok PJR, Means DB, Noonan BP, Schargel WE, Wheeler WC. 2006. Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 299: 1-268.
34. Grosjean S. 2005. The choice of external morphological characters and developmental stages for tadpole-based anuran taxonomy: a case study in Rana (Sylvirana) nigrovittata (Blyth, 1855) (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae). Contributions to Zoology 74: 61-76.
35. Grosjean S, Vences M, Dubois A. 2004. Evolutionary significance of oral morphology in the carnivorous tadpoles of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus (Ranidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 171-181.
36. Haas A. 2001. Mandibular arches musculature of anuran tadpoles, with comments on homologies of amphibian jaw muscles. Journal of Morphology 247: 1-33.
37. Haas A. 2003. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 19: 23-89.
38. Haas A, Richards SJ. 1998. Correlations of cranial morphology, ecology and evolution in australian suctorial tadpoles of the genera Litoria and Nyctimystes (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae: Pelodryadinae). Journal of Morphology 238: 109-141.
39. Haas A, Wolter J, Hertwig ST, Das I. 2009. Larval morphologies of three species of stream toads, genus Ansonia (Amphibia: Bufonidae) from East Malaysia (Borneo), with a key to known Bornean Ansonia tadpoles. Zootaxa 2302: 1-18.
40. Hall JA, Larsen JH Jr, Fitzner RE. 2002. Morphology of the prometamorphic larva of the spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus intermontanus (Anura: Pelobatidae), with an emphasis on the lateral line system and mouthparts. Journal of Morphology 252: 114-130.
41. Hanken J, Hall B. 1993. The skull. Volume 3. Functional and evolutionary mechanisms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. Héron-Royer LF, Van Bambeke C. 1889. Le vestibule de la bouche chez les têtards des batraciens anoures d'Europe. Archives de Biologie 9: 185-309.
43. Herrel A, Vanhooydonck B, Van Damme R. 2004. Omnivory in lacertid lizards: adaptive evolution or constraint? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 974-984.
44. Heyer R. 1983. Variation and systematics of frogs of the genus Cycloramphus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Arquivos de Zoologia 30: 235-339.
45. Hosoi M, Niida S, Yoshiko Y, Suemune S, Maeda N. 1995. Scanning electron microscopy of horny teeth in the anuran tadpole Rhacophoridae, Rhacophorus arboreus and Rhacophorus schlegelii. Journal of Electron Microscopy 44: 351-357.
46. Inger RF. 1960. A review of the Oriental toads of the genus Ansonia Stoliczka. Fieldiana Zoology 39: 473-503.
47. Inger RF. 1985. Tadpoles of the forested regions of Borneo. Fieldiana Zoology n. s. 26: 1-89.
48. Krieger JD. 2008. Extended eigenshape, Version 3.0. Available at:
49. Krieger JD, Guralnick RP, Smith DM. 2007. Generating empirically determined, continuous measures of leaf shape for paleoclimate reconstruction. Palaios 22: 212-219.
50. Lannoo MJ, Townsend DS, Wassersug RJ. 1987. Larval life in the leaves: arboreal tadpoles types, with special attention to the morphology, ecology, and behavior of the oophagous Osteopilus brunneus (Hylidae) larva. Fieldiana Zoology n. s. 38: 1-31.
51. Lavilla EO, Ponssa ML, Saleme S. 2000. Caracterización de las larvas de Bufo fenandezae Gallardo, 1957 y Bufo granulosus major Müller & Hellmich, 1936 (Anura: Bufonidae) y clave para la identificación de las larvas de Bufo que habitan el Chaco Argentino. Bollettino del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino 17: 333-344.
52. Littlejohn MJ, Martin AA. 1965. A new species of Crinia (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from South Australia. Copeia 1965: 19-24.
53. Lohmann GP. 1983. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology 15: 659-672.
54. MacLeod N. 1999. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25: 107-138.
55. MacLeod N. 2002. Geometric morphometrics and geological shape-classification systems. Earth-Science Reviews 59: 27-47.
56. Massare JA. 1987. Tooth morphology and prey preference of Mesozoic marine reptiles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 7: 121-137.
57. Noble GK. 1926. The importance of larval characters on the classification of South African Salientia. American Museum Novitates 237: 1-10.
58. Odendaal FJ, Bull CM. 1980. Influence of water speed on tadpoles of Ranidella signifera and R. riparia (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 28: 79-82.
59. Odendaal FJ, Bull CM, Nias RC. 1982. Habitat selection in tadpoles of Ranidella signifera and R. riparia (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Oecologia 52: 411-414.
60. Orrico VGD, Mongin MM, Carvalho-e-Silva AMPT. 2007. The tadpole of Hypsiboas latistriatus (Caramaschi & Cruz, 2004), a species of the Hypsiboas polytaenius (Cope, 1870) clade (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Zootaxa 1531: 25-37.
61. Padilla DK. 2003. Form and function of radular teeth of herbivorous mollusks: focus on the future. American Malacological Bulletin 18: 1-6.
62. Peixoto OL, Caramaschi U, Freire EMX. 2003. Two new species of Phyllodytes (Anura: Hylidae) from the state of Alagoas, northeastern Brazil. Herpetologica 59: 235-246.
63. Pfennig DW, Murphy PJ. 2000. Character displacement in polyphenic tadpoles. Evolution 54: 1738-1749.
64. Pfennig DW, Murphy PJ. 2002. How fluctuating competition and phenotypic plasticity mediate species divergence. Evolution 56: 1217-1228.
65. Ponssa ML. 2008. Cladistic analysis and osteological descriptions of the frog species in the Leptodactylus fuscus species group (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46: 249-266.
66. Pramuk JB. 2006. Phylogeny of South American Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) inferred from combined evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 407-452.
67. Quinzio SI, Fabrezi M, Faivovich J. 2006. Redescription of the tadpole of Chacophrys pierottii (Vellard, 1948) (Anura, Ceratophryidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 1: 202-209.
68. Rabanal FE, Formas JR. 2009. Complementary diagnosis of the genus Insuetophrynus (Anura, Cycloramphidae) based on larval characters. Zootaxa 2116: 59-67.
69. Reilly SM, McBrayer LD, White TD. 2001. Prey processing in amniotes: biomechanical and behavioral patterns of food reduction. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 128: 397-415.
70. Relyea RA, Auld JR. 2005. Predator- and competitor-induced plasticity: how changes in foraging morphology affect phenotypic trade-offs. Ecology 86: 1723-1729.
71. Rohlf FJ. 1986. Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis, and analysis of coordinates. Mathematical Geology 18: 815-857.
72. Rohlf FJ. 2005. tpsRelw, Version 1.42. New York, NY: Ecology & Evolution, SUNY at Stony Brook. Available at:
73. Rohlf FJ. 2008. tpsDig, Version 2.11. New York, NY: Ecology & Evolution, SUNY at Stony Brook. Available at:
74. Rüber L, Adams DC. 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 325-332.
75. Satel S, Wassersug RJ. 1981. On the relative sizes of buccal floor depressor and elevator musculature in tadpoles. Copeia 1981: 129-137.
76. Schiesari L, Werner EE, Ling GW. 2009. Carnivory and resource-based niche differentiation in anuran larvae: implications for food web and experimental ecology. Freshwater Biology 54: 572-586.
77. Seki Y, Schneider MS, Meyers MA. 2005. Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak. Acta Materialia 53: 5281-5296.
78. Storz BL. 2004. Reassessment of the environmental mechanisms controlling developmental polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Oecologia 141: 402-410.
79. Sumida SS, Murphy RW. 1987. Form and function of the tooth crown structure on gekkonid lizards (Reptilia, Squamata, Gekkonidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 2886-2892.
80. Taylor CL, Altig R, Boyle CR. 1996. Oral disc kinematics of four lentic anuran tadpoles. Herpetological Natural History 4: 49-56.
81. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 1997. CANOCO for Windows, Version 4.5. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Biometrics - Plant Research International.
82. Thibaudeau G, Altig R. 1988. Sequence of ontogenetic development and atrophy of the oral apparatus of six anuran tadpoles. Journal of Morphology 197: 63-69.
83. Thibaudeau G, Altig R. 1999. Endotrophic anurans. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, eds. Tadpoles: the biology of Anuran larvae. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 170-188.
84. Ungar PS, M'Kirera F. 2003. A solution to the worn tooth conundrum in primate functional anatomy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 3874-3877.
85. Van Buskirk J. 2009. Getting in shape: adaptation and phylogenetic inertia in morphology of Australian anuran larvae. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 1326-1337.
86. Van Dijk DE. 1966. Systematic and filed keys to the families, genera and described species of the Southern African anuran tadpoles. Annals of the Natal Museum 18: 231-286.
87. Venesky MD, Parris MJ, Storfer A. 2010a. Impacts of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection on tadpole foraging performance. EcoHealth 6: 565-575.
88. Venesky MD, Wassersug R, Parris MJ. 2010b. How does a change in labial tooth row number affect feeding kinematics and foraging performance of a ranid tadpole (Lithobates sphenocephalus)? Biological Bulletin 218: 160-168.
89. Venesky MD, Wassersug R, Parris MJ. 2010c. Fungal pathogen changes the feeding kinematics of larval anurans. Journal of Parasitology 96: 552-557.
90. Vera Candioti MF. 2005. Morphology and feeding in tadpoles of Ceratophrys cranwelli (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Acta Zoologica 86: 1-11.
91. Vera Candioti MF. 2007. Anatomy of anuran tadpoles from lentic water bodies: systematic relevance and correlation with feeding habits. Zootaxa 1600: 1-175.
92. Vera Candioti MF, Nuñez JJ, Ubeda C. 2010. Development of the nidicolous tadpoles of Eupsophus emiliopugini (Anura: Cycloramphidae) until metamorphosis, with comments on systematic relationships of the species and its endotrophic developmental mode. Acta Zoologica. Early view. doi 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00448.x.
93. Viertel B, Lötters S, Baumgart A, Oberst M, Eisenbeis G, Veith M. 2007. Larval morphology of reed frogs, Hyperolius kivuensis and H. viridiflavus, from western Kenya (Amphibia, Hyperoliidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 114: 825-837.
94. Wassersug RJ. 1980. Internal oral features of larvae from eight anuran families. Functional, systematics, evolutionary and ecological considerations. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 65: 1-146.
95. Wassersug RJ, Duellman WE. 1984. Oral structure and their development in egg-brooding hylid frog embryos and larvae: evolutionary and ecological implications. Journal of Morphology 182: 1-37.
96. Wassersug RJ, Hoff K. 1979. A comparative study of the buccal pumping mechanism of tadpoles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 12: 225-259.
97. Wassersug RJ, Yamashita M. 2001. Plasticity and constraints on feeding kinematics in anuran larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 131: 183-195.
98. Whiles MR, Galdyshev MI, Sushchik NN, Makhutova ON, Kalachova GS, Peterson SD, Regester KJ. 2009. Fatty acid analyses reveal high degrees of omnivory and dietary plasticity in pond-dwelling tadpoles. Freshwater Biology 55: 1533-1547.
99. Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Duellman WE, Reeder TW. 2007. Loss and re-evolution of complex life 658 cycles in marsupial frogs: does ancestral trait reconstruction mislead? Evolution 61: 1886-1899.
100. Zahn CT, Roskies RZ. 1972. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Transactions, Computers C21: 269-281.