Processing interrogative sentence mood at the semantic-syntactic interface: An electrophysiological research in Chinese, German, and Polish

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Kao, Chung Shan ^a   Dietrich, Rainer ^b   Sommer, Werner ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHINESE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; GERMANY; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOOD; NORMAL HUMAN; POLAND; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CHINA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; POLAND; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958593069     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013036     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 566 p.
2. Dietrich R (2007) Psycholinguistik [Psycholinguistics]. Stuttgart, Germany: J. B. Metzler. 326 p.
3. De Smedt K (1990) IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In Dale R, Mellish C, Zock M, eds. Current research in natural language generation. London: Academic Press. pp 167-192.
4. Dietrich R (1999) On the production of word order and the origin of incrementality. In Klabunde R, Stutterheim Cv, eds. Representations and processes in language production. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universit{eth}ts-Verlag. pp 57-87.
5. Kempen G, Hoenkamp E (1982) Incremental sentence generation: Implications for the structure of a syntactic processor. In Horecky J, ed. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp 151-156.
6. Kempen G, Hoenkamp E (1987) An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Sc 11: 201-258.
7. Wheeldon LR, Meyer AS, Smith MC (2003) Language production, incremental. In Nadal L, ed. Encyclopedia of cognitive science. London: Nature Publishing Group. pp 760-764.
8. Meyer AS (1996) Lexical access in phrase and sentence production. J Mem Lang 35:47-496.
9. Roelofs A (1998) Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: verb-particle combinations. J Exp Psychol Learn 24: 904-921.
10. Schriefers H, Teruel E, Meinshousen RM (1998) Producing simple sentences: Results from picture-word interference experiments. J Mem Lang 39: 609-632.
11. Bock K, Irwin DE, Davidson DJ, Levelt WJM (2003) Minding the clock. J Mem Lang 48: 653-685.
12. Griffin ZM (2001) Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition 82: B1-B14.
13. Griffin ZM, Bock K (2000) What the eyes say about speaking. Psychol Sci 11: 274-279.
14. Ferreira VS (1996) Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. J Mem Lang 35: 724-755.
15. Chomsky N (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 496 p.
16. Abraham W (1995) Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich: Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax des Deutschen [German syntax in language comparison: Fundamentals of a typological syntax of German]. Tbingen, Germany: Gunter Narr. 707 p.
17. Bach E (1962) The order of elements in a transformational grammar of German. Language 38: 263-239.
18. Brandt M, Reis M, Rosengren I, Zimmermann I (1992) Satztyp, Satzmodus und Illokution [Sentence type, sentence mood, and illocution]. In Rosengren I, ed. Satz und Illokution [Sentence and illocution]. Tbingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer. pp 1-90.
19. Grewendorf G, Hamm F, Sternefeld W (1989) Sprachliches Wissen: Eine Einfhrung in moderne Theorien der grammatischen Beschreibung [Linguistic knowledge: An introduction to modern theories of grammatical description]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. 467 p.
20. Haider H (1997) Projective economy. In Abraham W, van Gelderen E, eds. German: Syntactic problems - problematic syntax. Tbingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer. pp 83103.
21. Abdel Rahman R, Sommer W (2003) Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. Cognitive Brain Res 16: 372382.
22. Abdel Rahman R, Van Turennout M, Levelt WJM (2003) Phonological encoding is not contingent on semantic feature retrieval: An electrophysiological study on object naming. J Exp Psychol Learn 29: 850860.
23. Rodriguez-Fornells A, Schmitt BM, Kutas M, Mnte TF (2002) Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming. Neuropsychologia 40: 778787.
24. Schmitt BM, Mnte TF, Kutas M (2000) Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology 37: 473-484.
25. Schmitt BM, Rodriguez-Fornells A, Kutas M, Mnte TF (2001) Electrophysiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening to words. Neurosci Res 41: 293-298.
26. Schmitt BM, Schilz K, Zaake W, Kutas M, Mnte TF (2001) An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. J Cognitive Neurosci 13: 510-522.
27. Van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1997) Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. J Exp Psychol Learn 23: 787-806.
28. Van Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1999) The time course of grammatical and phonological processing during speaking: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Psycholinguist Res 28: 649-676.
29. De Jong R, Wierda M, Mulder G, Mulder LJM (1988) Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. J Exp Psychol Human 14: 682-692.
30. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Sirevaag EJ, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1988) Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Human 14: 331-344.
31. Coles MGH (1989) Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26: 251-269.
32. Kornhuber HH, Deecke L (1965) Hirnpotential{eth}nderungen bei Willkrbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale [Changes of brain potentials during voluntary and passive movements of humans: Readiness potential and reafferent potentials]. Pflgers Archiv 284: 1-17.
33. Brunia CHM, Vingerhoets AJJM (1980) CNV and EMG preceding a plantar flexion of the foot. Biol Psychol 11: 181-191.
34. Vaughan HG, Jr., Costa LD, Ritter W (1968) Topography of the human motor potential. Electroen Clin Neuro 25: 1-10.
35. Miller J, Hackley SA (1992) Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 195-209.
36. Sommer W, Ulrich R, Leuthold H (1996) Das lateralisierte Bereitschaftspotential als psychophysiologischer Zugang bei der Untersuchung kognitiver Prozesse [The lateralized readiness potential as psychophysiological approach to the investigation of cognitive processes]. Psychologische Rundschau 47: 1-14.
37. Osman A, Moore CM (1993) The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Human 19:1292-1312.
38. Masaki H, Wild-Wall N, Sangals J, Sommer W (2004) The functional localization of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 41: 220-230.
39. Low KA, Miller J (1999) The usefulness of partial information: Effects of go probability in the choice1nogo task. Psychophysiology 36: 288-297.
40. American Electroencephalographic Society (1994) Guideline nine: Guidelines on evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 11: 77-87.
41. Lippold OCJ (1967) Electromyography. In Venables PH, Martin I, eds. A manual of psychophysiological methods. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp 245-298.
42. Berg P, Scherg M (1994) A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroen Clin Neuro 90: 229-241.
43. Kiesel A, Miller J, Jolicrrur P, Brisson B (2008) Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology 45: 250-274.
44. Miller J, Patterson T, Ulrich R (1998) Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 35: 99-115.
45. MordkoffJT, Gianaros PJ (2000) Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology 37:347-360.
46. Ulrich R, Miller J (2001) Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 38: 816-827.
47. Bock K, Irwin DE, Davidson DJ (2004) Putting first things first. In Henderson JM, Ferreira F, eds. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world. New York: Psychology Press. pp 249-278.