Duration and intensity as perceptual cues for naïve listeners' prominence and boundary perception

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody, SP 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 739-742

  Mo, Yoonsook ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); LINGUISTICS; PRODUCTION CONTROL;

ACOUSTIC CORRELATES; AMERICAN ENGLISH; DIFFERENT MECHANISMS; ENCODING INFORMATIONS; PHRASE BOUNDARY; RHYTHMIC STRUCTURES; SPEECH PRODUCTION; SPONTANEOUS SPEECH;

SPEECH;

EID: 77958582755     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Chavarria, S; Yoon, T-J.; Cole, J.; Hasegawa-Johnson, M., 2004. Acoustic differentiation of ip and IP boundary level: Comparison of L- and L-L% in the Switchboard corpus. Proceedings of ISCA (Nara, Japan).
2. Choi, J-Y.; Hasegawa-Johnson, M.; Cole, J., 2005. Finding intonational boundaies using acoustic cues related to the voice source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 118 (4), 2579-2587.
3. Gusssenhoven, C.; Rietveld, A. C. M, 1988. Fundamental frequency declination in Dutch: testing three hypotheses. Journal of Phonetics. 16, 355-369.
4. Hasegawa-Johnson, M.; Fleck, M., ISLE Dictionary version 0.2.0," 2007, downloaded Oct. 19, 2007 from http://www.isle.uiuc.edu/dict/index.html
5. Heldner, M., 2003. On the reliability of overall intensity and spectral emphasis as acoustic correlates of focal accents in Swedish. Journal of Phonetics. 31, 39-62.
6. Kim, H.; Yoon, T-J.; Cole, J.; Hasegawa-Johnson, M., 2006. Acoustic differentiation of L- and L-L% in Switchboard and Radio news speech. Proceedings of ISCA (Dresden, Germany).
7. Kochanski, G.; Grabe, E.; Coleman, J.; Rosner, B., 2005. Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 118 (2), 1038-1054.
8. Labov, W.; Ash, S.; Boberg, C., 2006. The Atlas of North American English. Mouton de Gruyter (New York).
9. Pitt, M.A.; Dilley, L.; Johnson, K.; Kiesling, S.; Raymond, W.; Hume, E.; Fosler-Lussier, E., 2007. Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release) [www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu] Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University (Distributor).
10. Silpo, R.; Greenberg, S., 2000. Prosodic stress revisited: Reassessing the role of fundamental frequency. Proceedings of the NIST Speech Transcription Workshop (College Park, MD).
11. Sluijter, A. M. C.; Heuven, V. J. van, 1996. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. Proceedings of ICSLP (Philadelpia, PA). 630-633.