Adaptation and plasticity of animal communication in fluctuating environments

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3134-3148

  Ord, Terry J ^a,b   Stamps, Judy A ^b   Losos, Jonathan B ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anolis lizard; Ecological determinism; Historical contingency; Reaction norm; Territorial signal

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANIMAL; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HABITAT TYPE; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; LIZARD; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SIGNALING; TERRITORY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; LIZARD; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; LIZARDS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; ANOLIS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 77958576148     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01056.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Auld, J. R., A. A. Agrawal, and R. A. Relyea 2010. Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 277:503-511.
2. Badyaev, A. V., and E. S. Leaf 1997. Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114:40-46.
3. Baldwin, M. J. 1896. A new factor in evolution. Am. Nat. 30:441-451.
4. Bates, D. 2008. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package, 0.999375-28.
5. Bolnick, D. I., L. K. Snowberg, C. Patenia, W. E. Stutz, T. Ingram, and O. M. Lau 2009. Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference faciliates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 63:2004-2016.
6. Bradbury, J. W., and S. L. Vehrencamp 2000. Economic models of animal communication. Anim. Behav. 59:259-268.
7. Brumm, H., and H. Slabbekoorn 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv. Stud. Behav. 35:151-209.
8. Brumm, H., K. Voss, I. Kollmer, and D. Todt 2004. Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J. Exp. Biol. 207:443-448.
9. Derryberry, E. P. 2007. Evolution of bird song affects signal efficacy: an experimental test using historical and current signals. Evolution 61:1938-1945.
10. DeWitt, T. J., A. Sih, and D. S. Wilson 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:77-81.
11. Dingemanse, N. J., A. J. N. Kazem, D. Réale, and J. Wright 2010. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:81-89.
12. Engqvist, L. 2005. The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70:967-971.
13. Fleishman, L. J. 1992. The influence of the sensory system and the environment on motion patterns in the visual displays of anoline lizards and other vertebrates. Am. Nat. 139:S36-S61.
14. Fleishman, L. J. 2000. Signal function, signal efficiency and the evolution of anoline lizard dewlap color. Pp. 209-236 in Y. Espmark, T. Amundsen, and G. Rosenqvist, eds. Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
15. Fleishman, L. J., C. J. Marshall, and P. E. Hertz 1995. Comparative study of temporal response properties of the visual system of three species of anoline lizards. Copeia 1995:422-431.
16. Hansen, T. F., J. Pienaar, and S. H. Orzack 2008. A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62:1965-1977.
17. Huey, R. B., P. E. Hertz, and B. Sinervo 2003. Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: a null model approach. Am. Nat. 161:357-366.
18. Jackman, T. R., D. J. Irschick, K. De Queiroz, J. B. Losos, and A. Larson 2002. Molecular phylogenetic perspective on evolution of lizards of the Anolis grahami series. J. Exp. Zool. 294:1-16.
19. Jenssen, T. A., and B. Swenson 1974. An ecological correlate of critical flicker-fusion frequencies for some Anolis lizards. Vis. Res. 14:965-970.
20. Kreft, I. G. G., and J. De Leeuw 1998. Introducing multilevel modeling. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
21. Labra, A., J. Piernaar, and T. F. Hansen 2009. Evolution of thermal physiology in Liolaemus lizards: adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and niche tracking. Am. Nat. 174:204-220.
22. Lande, R. 2009. Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1435-1446.
23. Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
24. Losos, J. B., and L.-R. Chu 1998. Examination of factors potentially affecting dewlap size in Caribbean anoles. Copeia 1998:430-438.
25. Miller, P. J. O., N. Biassoni, A. Samuels, and P. L. Tyack 2000. Whale songs lengthen in response to sonar. Nature 405:903.
26. Mockford, E. J., and R. C. Marshall 2009. Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 276:2979-2985.
27. Nemeth, E., and H. Brumm 2009. Blackbirds sign higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? Anim. Behav. 78:637-641.
28. Nicholson, K. E., R. E. Glor, J. J. Kolbe, A. Larson, S. B. Hedges, and J. B. Losos 2005. Mainland colonization by island lizards. J. Biogeogr. 32:929-938.
29. Nieuwenhuis, R., B. Pelzer, and M. Te Grotenhuis 2009. Influence.ME: tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. R package, 0.7.
30. Ord, T. J. 2008. Dawn and dusk 'chorus' in visually communicating Jamaican anole lizards. Am. Nat. 172:585-592.
31. Ord, T. J., and J. A. Stamps 2008. Alert signals enhance animal communication in 'noisy' environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:18830-18835.
32. Ord, T. J., and E. P. Martins 2006. Tracing the origins of signal diversity in anole lizards: phylogenetic approaches to inferring the evolution of complex behaviour. Anim. Behav. 71:1411-1429.
33. Ord, T. J., R. A. Peters, B. Clucas, and J. A. Stamps 2007. Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 274:1057-1062.
34. Paenke, I., B. Sendhoff, and T. J. Kawecki 2007. Influence of plasticity and learning on evolution under directional selection. Am. Nat. 170:E47-E58.
35. Peters, R. A., C. W. G. Clifford, and C. S. Evans 2002. Measuring the structure of dynamic visual signals. Anim. Behav. 64:131-146.
36. Pigliucci, M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:481-486.
37. Pytte, C., K. M. Rusch, and M. S. Ficken 2003. Regulation of vocal amplitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae. Anim. Behav. 66:703-710.
38. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302.
39. Slabbekoorn, H., and M. Peet 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267.
40. Stamps, J., and T. G. G. Groothuis 2010. The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol. Rev. 85:301-325.
41. Wiley, R. H. 2006. Signal detection and animal communication. Adv. Stud. Behav. 36:217-247.
42. Wiley, R. H., and D. G. Richards 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. Pp. 131-181 in D. E. Kroodsma, E. H. Miller, and H. Ouellet, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. New York: Academic Press.