Meaning of missing values in eyewitness recall and accident records

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1-7

  Uttl, Bob ^a   Kisinger, Kelly ^b  

^a MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VIDEORECORDING; WITNESS; CAR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILES; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; RECORDS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77958561742     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012539     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Uttl B, Graf P (2006) Age-related changes in the encoding and retrieval of emotional and non-emotional information. Memory and Emotion. New York, NY, US: Blackwell Publishing. pp 159-187.
2. Baddeley A (1997) Human Memory: Theory And Practice, Revised Edition. 2nd ed. Psychology Press.
3. Schmidt S (1991) Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition 19: 523-542.
4. Lindsay RCL, Martin R, Webber L (1994) Default Values in Eyewitness Descriptions: A Problem for the Match-to-Description Lineup Foil Selection Strategy. Law and Human Behavior 18: 527-541.
5. Bunn TL, Slavova S, Hall L (2008) Narrative text analysis of Kentucky tractor fatality reports. Accident Analysis & Prevention 40: 419-425. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.010.
6. McCammon I (2002) Evidence of heuristic traps in recreational avalanche accidents. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop: Penticton, BC, Canada. pp 1-8.
7. McCammon I (2004) Heuristic traps in recreational avalanche accidents: Evidence and implications. Avalanche News 68: 1-10.
8. Haegeli P, McCammon I (2006) Avaluator Avalanche Accident Prevention Card. Revelstoke, BC, Canada: Canadian Avalanche Association.
9. McCammon I, Hageli P. (2007) An evaluation of rule-based decision tools for travel in avalanche terrain. Cold Regions Science and Technology 47: 193-206. doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.08.007.
10. Uttl B, Uttl J, Henry M (2008) The Avaluator Avalanche Accident Prevention Card: Facts, Fictions, and Controversies. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop: Whistler, BC, Canada. pp 445-454.
11. Floyer J (2008) Review of the Obvious Clue Method: Report for Canadian Avalanche Centre. Revelstoke, BC, Canada: Canadian Avalanche Centre. pp 39.
12. Little RJA, Rubin DB (1989) The Analysis of Social Science Data with Missing Values. Sociological Methods Research 18: 292-326. doi:10.1177/ 0049124189018002004.
13. Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7: 147-177.
14. McKnight PE, McKnight KM, Sidani S, Figueredo AJ (2007) Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. 1st ed. The Guilford Press.
15. Uttl B, Henry M, Uttl J (2008) The Avaluator's Obvious Clues accident prevention values: Are they replicable? Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop.: Whistler, BC, Canada. pp 538-547.
16. Uttl B, Kibreab M, Kisinger K, Uttl J (2009) Trend analysis of Canadian avalanche accidents: The Avaluator Avalanche Accident Prevention Card has not reduced the number of accidents. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Davos, Switzerland: Davos, Switzerland. pp 610-613.
17. McCammon I, Haegeli P (2006) Evaluation of a rule-based decision aid for recreational travelers in avalanche terrain. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop: Telluride, CO, USA. pp 1-10.
18. Little RJA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley.
19. Canadian Avalanche Centre (2006) Introducing the Avaluator decision tool - Avalanche safety just got simpler! AST News. 2: 1-2.
20. Haegeli P, McCammon I, Jamieson B, Israelson C, Statham G (2006) The Avaluator - A Canadian rule-based avalanche decision support tool for amateur recreationists. Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop.: Telluride, CO, USA. pp 1-10.
21. APA Publication and Communication Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008) Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist 63: 839-851. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839.
22. Wilkinson L, Task Force on Statistical Inference, American Psychological Association, Science Directorate (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54: 594-604. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.
23. Uttl B, Kisinger K, Kibreab M, Uttl J (2009) Avaluator's Obvious Clues Prevention Values are inflated: Evidence from Canadian avalanche accidents. International Snow Science Workshop, Davos, Switzerland: Davos, Switzerland. pp 619-622.
24. Uttl B, Uttl J (2009) On superiority of simple solutions to complex problems and other fairy tales. International Snow Science Workshop, Davos, Switzerland: Davos, Switzerland. pp 623-627.