A probabilistic-logical framework for ontology matching

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2010, Pages 1413-1418

  Niepert, Mathias ^a   Meilicke, Christian ^a   Stuckenschmidt, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SEMANTICS;

BENCHMARK DATASETS; CONFIDENCE VALUES; HETEROGENEOUS ONTOLOGY; LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; MARKOV LOGIC; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; ONTOLOGY MATCHING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 77958555434     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Albagli, S.; Ben-Eliyahu-Zohary, R.; and Shimony, S. E. 2009. Markov network based ontology matching. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1884-1889.
2. Cruz, I.; Palandri, F; Antonelli; and Stroe, C. 2009. Efficient selection of mappings and automatic quality-driven combination of matching methods. In Proceedings of the ISWC 2009 Workshop on Ontology Matching.
3. Ding, L., and Finin, T. 2006. Characterizing the semantic web on the web. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference 2006, 242-257.
4. Domingos, P.; Lowd, D.; Kok, S.; Poon, H.; Richardson, M.; and Singla, P. 2008. Just add weights: Markov logic for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Uncertain Reasoning for the Semantic Web, 1-25
5. Euzenat, J., and Shvaiko, P. 2007. Ontology matching. Springer-Verlag.
6. Jérôme Euzenat et al. 2009. Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2009. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Matching.
7. Levenshtein, V. I. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions and insertions and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 845-848.
8. Meilicke, C, and Stuckenschmidt, H. 2007. Analyzing mapping extraction approaches. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Matching.
9. Meilicke, C, and Stuckenschmidt, H. 2009. An efficient method for computing alignment diagnoses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, 182-196.
10. Meilicke, C; Tamilin, A.; and Stuckenschmidt, H. 2007. Repairing ontology mappings. In Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1408-1413.
11. Melnik, S.; Garcia-Molina, H.; and Rahm., E. 2002. Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. In Proceedings of ICDE, 117-128.
12. Meza-Ruiz, I., and Riedel, S. 2009. Multilingual semantic role labelling with markov logic. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 85-90.
13. Richardson, M., and Domingos, P. 2006. Markov logic networks. Machine Learning 62( 1-2): 107-136.
14. Riedel, S. 2008. Improving the accuracy and efficiency of map inference for markov logic. In Proceedings of UAI, 468-475.
15. Roth, D., and Yih, W. 2005. Integer linear programming inference for conditional random fields. In Proceedings of ICML, 736-743.
16. Schrijver, A. 1998. Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. Wiley & Sons.
17. Sirin, E.; Parsia, B.; Grau, B. C; Kalyanpur, A.; and Katz, Y. 2007. Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 5(2):51-53.
18. Svab, O.; Svatek, V.; Berka, P.; Rak, D.; and Tomasek, P. 2005. Ontofarm: Towards an experimental collection of parallel ontologies. In Poster Track of ISWC.
19. Taskar, B.; Chatalbashev, V.; Roller, D.; and Guestrin, C. 2005. Learning structured prediction models: a large margin approach. In Proceedings of ICML, 896-903.
20. Wu, F, and Weld, D. S. 2008. Automatically refining the wikipedia infobox ontology. In Proceeding of the International World Wide Web Conference, 635-644.