Assessing the impact of crops on regional CO2 fluxes and atmospheric concentrations

Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 521-532

  Corbin, K D ^a   Denning, A S ^b   Lokupitiya, E Y ^b   Schuh, A E ^b   Miles, N L ^c   Davis, K J ^c   Richardson, S ^c   Baker, I T ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CROP; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; MAIZE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHENOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOYBEAN; WHEAT;

UNITED STATES;

GLYCINE MAX; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77958544316     PISSN: 02806509     EISSN: 16000889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00485.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Bakwin, P. S., Zhao, C. and Tans, P. 2009. Carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide dry air mole fractions from the NOAA ESRL tall tower network, 1992-2009. Version: 2009-05-12,
2. Baker, I. T. and Denning, A. S. 2008. SiB3 modeled global 1-degree hourly biosphere-atmosphere carbon flux, 1998-2006. In: Data set. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA,
3. Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L. H., Olson, R., Hollinger, D. and co-authors. 2001. FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. B. Am. Meteor. Soc. 82, 2415-2434.
4. Betts, R. A. 2005. Integrated approaches to climate-crop modelling: needs and challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 2049-2065, doi:.
5. Bonan, G. B. 1997. Effects of land use on the climate of the United States. Climatic Change 37, 449-486.
6. Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W. and co-authors. 2007. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biol. 13, 679-706, doi:.
7. CopelJ. H., Pielke, R. A. and Kittel, T. G. F. 1996. Potential climatic impacts of vegetation change: a regional modeling study. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos 101(D3), 7409-7418.
8. 2 retrievals. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos 113(D02301), doi:.
9. Crosson, E. R. 2008. A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor. Appl. Phys. B 92(3), 403-408.
10. 2 over a Wisconsin forest using a coupled ecosystem-atmosphere model. Global Change Biol. 9, 1241-1250.
11. De Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Gervois, S., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., Brisson, N. and co-authors. 2004. Coupling the Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere-Transfer Scheme ORCHIDEE to the agronomy model STICS to study the influence of croplands on the European carbon and water budgets. Agronomie 24, 397-407, doi:.
12. Energy Information Administration. 2007. Emissions of greenhouse gases. Report DOE/EIA-0573. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 64.
13. Frietas, S. R., Longo, K. M., Silva Dias, M. A. F., Silva Dias, P. L., Chatfield, R. and co-authors. 2005. Monitoring the transport of biomass burning emissions in South America. Environ. Fluid Mech. 5(1-2), 135-167.
14. Gervois, S., De Noblet-Ducoudre, N., Viovy, N. and Ciais, P. 2004. Including croplands in a global biosphere model: methodology and evaluation at specific sites. Earth Interact. 8(16), 1-25.
15. 2 exchange using the eddy covariance technique. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 113(D08304), doi:.
16. 2 emission fluxes for the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, doi:.
17. Houghton, R. A. 2003. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850-2000. Tellus 55B, 378-390.
18. International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP). 2000. Global soil data products CD-ROM (IGBP-DIS). In: Global Soil Data Task. Data and Information System, Potsdam, Germany Available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributive Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA,
19. 2 emissions. Science 300(5625), 1538-1542.
20. Lawrence, D. M. and Slingo, J. M. 2004. An annual cycle of vegetation in a GCM. Part II: Global impacts on climate and hydrology. Climate Dyn. 22, 107-122, doi:.
21. Lokupitiya, E., Breidt, F. J., Lokupitiya, R., Williams, S. and Paustian, K. 2007. Deriving comprehensive county-level crop yield and area data for U.S. cropland. Agron. J., 99(3), 673-681.
22. Lokupitiya, E., Denning, A. S., Paustian, K., Baker, I. T., Schaefer, K. and co-authors. 2009. Incorporation of crop phenology in Simple Biosphere Model (SiBcrop) to improve land-atmosphere carbon exchanges from croplands. Biogeosciences 6, 969-986.
23. 2 variations in the Tapajos Region, Para, Brazil. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 110(D21102), doi:.
24. Matamala, R., Jastrow, D. J., Miller, R. M. and Garten, C. 2008. Temporal changes in the distribution of C and N stocks in a restored tallgrass prairie in the U.S. Midwest. Ecol. Appl. 18, 1470-1488.
25. Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C. and co-authors. 2006. North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87(3), 343-360.
26. Nicholls, M. E., Denning, A. S., Prihodko, L., Vidale, P.-L., Baker, I. T. and co-authors. 2004. A multiple-scale simulation of variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide using a coupled biosphere-atmospheric model. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 109(D18117), doi:.
27. Ogle, S., Davis, K. J., Andrews, A., Gurney, K. R., West, T. and co-authors. 2006. Mid-continent intensive campaign of the North America Carbon Program. Sci. Plan.,
28. Osborne, T. M., Lawrence, D. M., Challinor, A. J., Slingo, J. M. and Wheeler, T. R. 2007. Development and assessment of a coupled crop-climate model. Global Change Biol. 13, 169-183, doi:.
29. 2 in North America, South America, and Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 7239-7254.
30. Ramankutty, N. and Foley, J. A. 1998. Characterizing patterns of global land use: an analysis of global croplands data. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12(4), 667-685.
31. Richardson, S. J., Miles, N. L., Davis, K. J., Crosson, E., Van Pelt, A. D. and co-authors. 2009. EOS Trans. AGU 90(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract B51E-0343.
32. Verma, S. B., Dobermann, A., Cassman, K. G., Walters, D. T., Knops, J. M. and co-authors. 2005. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agric. Forest. Met. 131(1-2), 77-96.
33. Vleeshouwers, L. M. and Verhagen, A. 2002. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Global Change Biol. 8, 519-530.
34. 2. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 112(D04108), doi:.
35. Xiao, J. F., Zhuang, Q. L., Baldocchi, D. D., Law, B. E., Richardson, A. D. and co-authors. 2008. Estimation of net ecosystem carbon exchange for the conterminous United States by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data. Agric. Forest Met. 148(11), 1827-1847.
36. Zhao, M., Heinsch, F. A., Nemani, R. R. and Running, S. W. 2005. Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Rem. Sens. Environ. 95, 164-176.