Intradermal running suture versus 3M™ Vetbond™ tissue adhesive for wound closure in rodents: A biomechanical and histological study

European Surgical Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 321-326

  Sabol, F ^a   Vasilenko, T ^a,d,e   Novotny M ^a,f   Tomori, Z ^b,d   Bobrov, N ^c   Zivak J ^d   Hudak R ^d   Gal P ^a,e,g  

^a East Slovak Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases   (Slovakia)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS   (Slovakia)

^c Department of Forensic Medicine   (Slovakia)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e 3rd Department of Surgery   (Slovakia)

^f P J AFÁRIK UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^g NONE   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Glue; Tissue repair and regeneration; Wound healing, rats

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; ENBUCRILATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIZATION; FIBROBLAST; FULL THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT; GRANULATION TISSUE; INTRADERMAL RUNNING SUTURE; MALE; NEUTROPHIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCAR FORMATION; SKIN INCISION; SUTURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; VASCULARIZATION; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CICATRIX; ENBUCRILATE; GRANULATION TISSUE; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIVES; WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 77958540696     PISSN: 0014312X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000320837     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wong NL: The running locked intradermal suture: a cosmetically elegant continuous suture for wounds under light tension. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 30-36.
2. Reiter D: Methods and materials for wound closure. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 285: 1069-1080.
3. Boothe HW: Selecting suture materials for small animal surgery. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998; 20: 155-162.
4. Stroncek JD, Bell N, Reichert WM: Instructional Power Point presentations for cutaneous wound healing and tissue response to sutures. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90: 1230-1238.
5. Guyuron B, Vaughan C: A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 234-236.
6. Chibbaro S, Tacconi L: Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16: 535-539.
7. Quinn J, Maw J, Ramotar K, Wenckebach G, Wells G: Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair in a contaminated wound model. Surgery 1997; 122: 69-72.
8. Van den Ende ED, Vriens PW, Allema JH, Breslau PJ: Adhesive bonds or percutaneous absorbable suture for closure of surgical wounds in children: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 1249-1251.
9. Gál P, Tomori Z, Novotný M, Filický F, Hudák R, Sabo J, Živèák J: Load speed affects the values of skin wound strength measured by a newly developed highly sensitive testing device. Lékaø a technika 2008; 38: 85-88.
10. Gál P, Toporcer T, Vidinský B, Hudák R, Zivcák J, Sabo J: Simple interrupted percutaneous suture versus intradermal running suture for wound tensile strength measurement in rats: a technical note. Eur Surg Res 2009; 43: 61-65.
11. Gál P, Toporcer T, Grendel T, Vidová Z, Smetana K Jr, Dvoránková B, Gál T, Mozes S, Lenhardt L, Longauer F, Sabol M, Sabo J, Backor M: Effect of Atropa belladonna L. on skin wound healing: biomechanical and histological study in rats and in vitro study in keratinocytes, 3T3 fibroblasts, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17: 378-386.
12. Finch S, Cumming G: Putting research in context: understanding confidence intervals from one or more studies. J Pediatr Psychol 2009; 34: 903-916.
13. Orozco-Covarrubias ML, Ruiz-Maldonado R: Surgical facial wounds: simple interrupted percutaneous suture versus running intradermal suture. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25: 109-112.
14. Bruns TB, Robinson BS, Smith RJ, Kile DL, Davis TP, Sullivan KM, Quinn JV: A new tissue adhesive for laceration repair in children. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 1067-1070.
15. Handschel JG, Depprich RA, Dirksen D, Runte C, Zimmermann A, Kübler NR: A prospective comparison of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate and suture in standardized facial wounds. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 318-323.
16. Hasan Z, Gangopadhyay AN, Gupta DK, Srivastava P, Sharma SP: Sutureless skin closure with isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate in pediatric day-care surgery. Pediatr Surg Int 2009; 25: 1123-1125.
17. Eiferman RA, Snyder JW: Antibacterial effect of cyanoacrylate glue. Arch Ophthalmol 1983; 101: 958-960.
18. Romero IL, Malta JB, Silva CB, Mimica LM, Soong KH, Hida RY: Antibacterial properties of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: does the polymerization reaction play a role? Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57: 341-344.
19. Bozkurt MK, Saydam L: The use of cyanoacrylates for wound closure in head and neck surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 265: 331-335.
20. Eymann R, Kiefer M: Glue instead of stitches: a minor change of the operative technique with a serious impact on the shunt infection rate. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2010; 106: 87-89.
21. Shapiro AJ, Dinsmore RC, North JH Jr: Tensile strength of wound closure with cyanoacrylate glue. Am Surg 2001; 67: 1113-1115.
22. Pelissier P, Casoli V, Le Bail B, Martin D, Baudet J: Internal use of n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (Indermil) for wound closure: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1661-1666.
23. Alan M, Yener Z, Tasal I, Bakir B: Comparison of fibrin glue and suture in the healing of teat incisions in lactating goats. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr 2008; 115: 198-202.
24. Sharma A, Kaur R, Kumar S, Gupta P, Pandav S, Patnaik B, Gupta A: Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 291-298. (Pubitemid 36184332)
25. Singer AJ, Perry LC, Allen RL Jr: In vivo study of wound bursting strength and compliance of topical skin adhesives. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 1290-1294.