Strategies for promoting the scientific integrity of nursing research in clinical settings

Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 200-205

  Barrett, Roseann ^a  

^a ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CONSULTATION; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING STAFF; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; TEACHER; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CONSULTANTS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MENTORS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; STAFF DEVELOPMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77958538621     PISSN: 10987886     EISSN: 15389049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NND.0b013e31819b55dd     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Nurses Credentialing Center Retrieved1 2007 Frequently Asked Questions About Research/Evidence-Based Practice rfurl http://www. nursecredentialing.org/ancc/magnet/getall.cfm February 22, 2007, from
2. American Nurses Credentialing Center. (
3. Broome, M. (2003). Scientific integrityVthe cornerstone of knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(1), 56Y59.
4. Department of Health and Human Services. (
5. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. (2001). Federal policy on research misconduct. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
6. Houser, J., & Bokovoy, J. (2006). Clinical research in practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
7. Hudson-Barr, D., & King, C. (2004). Fromnursing research committee to nursing research council. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 9(4), 139-141.
8. Hueston, W., Mainous, A., Weiss, B., Macauly, A., Hickner, J., & Sherwood, R. (2006). Protecting participants in family medicine research. A consensus statement on improving research integrity and participants , safety in educational research, community-based participatory research and practice network research. Family Medicine, 38(2), 116-120.
9. Institute of Medicine Washington rfpy1 2002 Integrity and Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct Washington, DC: The Nationalt Academic Press.
10. Institute of Medicine. (2003). Responsible research: A systems approach to protecting research participants. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
11. Jeffers, B. (2005). Research environments that promote integrity. Nursing Research, 54(1), 63Y70.
12. Ketefian, S. (2001). The challenge for nursing research: Scientific integrity. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 7, 227-228.
13. Lenz, E., & Ketefian, S. (1995). Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research. Part I: Current approaches in doctoral programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(4), 213-219.
14. Macrina, F., & Munro, C. (1995). The case study approach to teaching scientific integrity in nursing and the biomedical sciences. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(1), 40-44.
15. Midwest Nursing Research Society. (2002). Guidelines for scientific integrity (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Author.
16. Newhouse, R., & Mills, M. E. (2001). Research in the community hospital. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(12), 583-587.
17. Sheehan, J. (1993). Issues in the supervision of post-graduate research students in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 880-885.
18. Wocial, L. (1995). The role of mentors in promoting integrity and preventing scientific misconduct in nursing research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(5), 276-280.
19. Yun, G., & Trumbo, C. (2000). Comparative responses to a survey executed by post, e-mail & Web form. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1).