Spatial quantification and classification of skin response following perturbation using organotypic skin cultures

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2760-2766

  Pommerencke, Thora ^a,b   Westphal, Kathi ^a,b   Ernst, Claudia ^a,b   Safferling, Kai ^a,b   Dickhaus, Hartmut ^a,b   Steinberg, Thorsten ^c   Tomakidi, Pascal ^c   Grabe, Niels ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; MAP KINASE ACTIVATED KINASE 2; MAP-KINASE-ACTIVATED KINASE 2; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SKIN;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SKIN; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

EID: 77958515361     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq525     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersen,M.E. and Krewski,D. (2009) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life. Toxicol. Sci., 107, 324-330.
2. Bell,E. et al. (1981) Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness. Science, 211, 1052-1054.
3. Boxman,I. et al. (2002) Proteomic analysis of skin irritation reveals the induction of HSP27 by sodium lauryl sulphate in human skin. Br. J. Dermatol., 146, 777-785.
4. Canny,J. (1986)Acomputational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 8, 679-698.
5. Coquette,A. et al. (2003) Analysis of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) expression and release in vitro reconstructed human epidermis for the prediction of in vivo skin irritation and/or sensitization. Toxicol. In Vitro, 17, 311-321.
6. Draize,J. et al. (1944) Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 82, 377-390.
7. Duda,R. et al. (2000) Pattern Classification, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. TM cultures to sodium lauryl sulphate. Toxicol. In Vitro, 20, 975-985.
9. Giuliano,K.A. et al. (1997) High-content screening: a new approach to easing key bottlenecks in the drug discovery process. J. Biomol. Screen., 2, 249-259.
10. Grabe,N. and Neuber,K. (2005) A multi-cellular systems biology model predicts epidermal morphology, kinetics, and Ca++ flow. Bioinformatics, 21, 3541-3547.
11. Grabe,N. et al. (2007) Reconstructing protein networks of epithelial differentiation from histological sections. Bioinformatics, 23, 3200-3208.
12. Ho,R.L. and Lieu,C.A. (2008) Systems biology-an evolving approach in drug discovery and development. Drugs R D, 9, 203-216.
13. Kohavi,R. (1995) A Study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1137-1143.
14. Krewski,D. et al. (2009) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment. Risk Anal., 29, 474-479.
15. Meyer,F. (1994) Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Processing, 38, 113-125.
16. Mosmann,T. (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55-63.
17. Otsu,N. (1979) A threshold selection method from grey-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 9, 62-66.
18. Perry,A.D. and Trafeli,J.P. (2009) Hand dermatitis: review of etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J. Am. Board Fam. Med., 22, 325-330.
19. Pommerencke,T. et al. (2007) Ermittlung von räumlichen Proteinexpressionsmustern mittels Bildverarbeitung. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
20. Pommerencke,T. et al. (2008) Nuclear staining and relative distance for quantifying epidermal differentiation in biomarker expression profiling. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 473.
21. Pommerencke,T. et al. (2009) Vollautomatische Einzelzellerkennung auf fluoreszenten Gewebeschnitten humaner Epidermis. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
22. Robinson,M.K. et al. (2002) Non-animal testing strategies for assessment of the skin corrosion and skin irritation potential of ingredients and finished products. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40, 573-592.
23. Schnuch,A. (2007) Unwanted effects due to cosmetics-a review. Allergologie, 30, 411-430.
24. Slodownik,D. et al. (2008) Irritant contact dermatitis: a review. Australas. J. Dermatol., 49, 1-11.
25. Thomas,N. (2010) High-content screening: a decade of evolution. J. Biomol. Screen., 15, 1-9.
26. Welss,T. et al. (2004) In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. Toxicol. In Vitro, 18, 231-243.
27. Zweig,M. and Campbell,G. (1993) Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem., 39, 561-77.