An environmental/input-output linear programming model to reach the targets for greenhouse gas emissions set by thekyoto protocol

Economic Systems Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 223-236

  Cristóbal, José Ramon San ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Environment; Greenhouse gases; Input output; Kyoto protocol

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GAS; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; LINEAR PROGRAMING; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 77958510994     PISSN: 09535314     EISSN: 14695758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2010.495709     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alcántara, V. and E. Padilla (2009) Input-Output Subsystems and Pollution: An Application to the Service Sector and CO2 Emissions in Spain. Ecological Economics, 68, 905-914.
2. Alcántara, V. and J. Roca (1995) Energy and CO2 Emissions in Spain: Methodology of Analysis and some Results for 1980-1990. Energy Economics, 17, 221-230.
3. Beutel, J. (1983) Input-Output Analysis and Linear Programming: The General Input-Output Model. In: M.Grassini and A. Smyshlyaev (eds.) Input-Output Modeling, Proceedings of the 3rd IIASA Task Force Meeting, 313-328. Laxenburg: IIASA.
4. Butnar, I. and M. Llop (2007) Composition of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Spain: An Input-Output Analysis. Ecological Economics, 61, 388-395.
5. Carter, A.P. (1970) A Linear Programming System Analysing Embodied Technological Change. In: A.P. Carter and A. Brody (eds.) Applications of Input-Output Analysis. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 77-98.
6. Dantzig, G.B. (1963) Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Dorfman, R., P. Samuelson and R. Solow (1958) Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York, McGraw Hill.
7. Gielen, D. and Y. Moriguchi (2002) CO2 and the Iron and Steel Industry: An Analysis of Japanese Emission Reduction Potentials. Energy Policy, 30, 849-863.
8. Gupta, J., X. Olsthoorn and E. Rotenberg (2003) The Role of Scientific Uncertainty in Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the Climate Change Convention. Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 475-486.
9. Höhne, N., S. Wartmann, A. Herold and A. Feibaner (2007) The Rules for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry under the Kyoto Protocol - Lessons Learned for the Future Climate Negotiations. EnvironmentalScience and Policy, 10, 353-369.
10. Instituto nacional de estadística (Ine) (2008) Cuentas Satélite sobre Emisiones Atmosféricas. Serie 1995-2000.
11. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Lenzen, M. (2001) A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 13, 65-92.
12. Lenzen, M. (2002) A Guide for Compiling Inventories in Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessments: Some Australian Results. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 545-572.
13. Lenzen, M., L.L. Pade and J. Munksgaard (2004) CO2 Multipliers in Multi-Region Input-Output Models. Economic Systems Research, 16, 391-412.
14. Leontief, W. (1970) Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure - An Input-Output Approach. Review of Economic and Statistics, 52, 262-271.
15. Leontief, W. and D. Ford (1972) Air Pollution and the Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input- Output Computations. In: A. Brody and A. Carter (eds.) Input-Output Techniques. Amsterdam, North- Holland, 9-30.
16. Lixona, B., P.J. Thomassinb and B. Hamaide (2008) Industrial Output Restriction and the Kyoto Protocol: AnInput-Output Approach with Application to Canada. Ecological Economics, 68, 249-258.
17. Matuszewski, T.I., P.R. Pitts and J.A. Sawyer (1964) Linear Programming Estimates of Changes in Input Coefficients. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 30, 203-210.
18. Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair (1985) Input/Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
19. Monni, S., S. Syri and I. Savolainen (2004) Uncertainties in the Finnish Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 87-98.
20. OECD (2008) Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Input Output Tables. OECD.
21. Ostblom, G. (1998) The Environmental Outcome of Emissions-Intensive Economic Growth: A Critical Look at Official Growth Projections for Sweden Up to the Year 2000. Economic Systems Research, 10, 19-29.
22. Rehan, R. and M. Nehdi (2005) Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Climate Change: Policy Implications for the Cement Industry. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 105-114.
23. Roca, J. and M. Serrano (2007) Income Growth and Atmospheric Pollution in Spain: An Input-Output Approach. Ecological Economics, 63, 230-242.
24. Salvia, M., F. Pietra, C. Cosmi, V. Cuomo and M. Machiato (2004) Approaching the Kyoto Targets: A Case Studyfor Basilicata Region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 8, 73-90.
25. Tarancón, M.A. and P. del Río (2007) A Combined Input-Output and Sensitivity Analysis Approach to Analyze Sector Linkages and CO2 Emissions. Energy Economics, 29, 578-597.
26. Tompkins, E.L. and H. Amundsen (2008) Perceptions of the Effectiveness of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Advancing National Action on Climate Change. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 1-13.
27. Van Vuuren, D.P., J. Cofala, H.E. Eerrens, R. Oostenrijk, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, M.G.J. den Elzen and M. Amann (2006) Exploring the Ancillary Benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for Air Pollution in Europe. Energy Policy, 34, 444-460.
28. Weisser, D., M. Howells and H.H. Rogner (2008) Nuclear Power and Post-2012 Energy and Climate Change Policies. Environmental Science and Policy, 11, 467-477.
29. Xie, J. and S. Saltzman (2000) Environmental Policy Analysis: An Environmental Computable General- Equilibrium Approach for Developing Countries. Journal of Policy Modelling, 22, 453-489.