The internet jurisdiction risk of cloud computing

Information Systems Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 334-339

  Ward, Burke T ^a   Sipior, Janice C ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cloud computing; Internet and litigation; Internet jurisdiction; Internet regulation; Jurisdiction risk

Indexed keywords

CASE LAW; INTERNET ACTIVITY; LEGAL ACTION; LEGAL THEORY; SIMPLE TESTS;

CLOUD COMPUTING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

INTERNET;

EID: 77958510318     PISSN: 10580530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2010.514248     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, A. (2001). Internet jurisdiction today. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 22 (1), 69-91.
2. Anonymous. (2010, February 8). 360degIT: Cloud computing creates a new legal ballgame; But who will solve the legal issues on this important new technology? M2 Presswire. Asahi Metal Industry Col., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, Solano County, 480 U.S. 102, 107 S. Ct. 1026, 94 L. (E. D. 2d 92 (1987).
3. Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 937 F. Supp. 295 (S.D. N.Y. 1996). Cooter, M. (2010, July 25). More Businesses Turn to Cloud. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from CIO's site: http://www.cio.com/article/600524/More_Businesses_Turn_to_CloudDow Jones & Co. v. Gutnick (HCA 56 Dec. 10, 2002).
4. Fogarty, K. (2010, July 8). Cloud Computing: Today's Four Favorite Flavors, Explained. CIO. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from the CIO site: http://www.cio.com/article/598918/Cloud_Computing_Today_s_Four_Favorite_Flavors_Explained
5. Geist, M. A. (2001). Is there a there there? Toward greater certainty for internet jurisdiction. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16 (3), 1345.
6. Goodman, J. (2009). The CIO's Guide To Cloud Computing. GlassHouse Technologies White paper. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from GlassHouse Technologies site: http://www.glasshouse.com/whitepapers.php
7. Hammond, B. (2010, April 5). Canadian Privacy Report Offers Skeptical View of 'Cloud Computing.' Cybersecurity Policy Report. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry. (Document ID: 2026231951).
8. Harris, J. G., & Alter, A. E. (2010, January). Six Questions Every Executive Should Ask about Cloud Computing. Accenture Institute for High Performance. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from Accenture's site: http://www.accenture.com/Global/Research_and_Insights/Institute-For-High-Performance/Six-Questions.htm
9. Hestermeyer, H. P. (2006). Personal jurisdiction for internet torts: towards an international solution? Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 26 (267), 267-288.
10. International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 66 S.Ct. 154 (1945).
11. Knorr, E., & Gruman, G. (2008, July 8). What cloud computing really means. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from http://www.infoworld.com/d/cloudcomputing/what-cloud-computing-really-means-031
12. Kobrin, S. (2001). Territoriality and the governance of cyberspace. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 687-704.
13. Kuner, C. (2009, August 30). Internet Jurisdiction and Data Protection Law: An International Legal Analysis. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Document ID: 1911624271).
14. Levinson, M. (2007, May 15) Software as a Service (SaaS) Definition and Solutions. Retrieved July 31, 2010 from http://www.cio.com/article/109704/Software_as_a_Service_SaaS_Definition_and_Solutions#SaaS
15. Manolopoulos, A. (2003). Raising cyber-borders: the interaction between law and technology. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 11 (1), 40.
16. McAlpine, C. (2010, March/April). Consider the Legal Risks of Cloud Computing. Baseline, 32.
17. Minnesota v. Granite Gate Resorts, Inc., 568 N.W.2d. 715 (Minn. Ct. App., Sept. 5, 1997).
18. Nelson, M. R. (2009). The Cloud, the Crowd, and Public Policy. Issues in Science and Technology, 71-76.
19. People Solutions, Inc. v. People Solutions, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. (N.D. Tex. 2000).
20. Reidenberg J. (2000). Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1315, 1318.
21. Rice, D. T. (2004). Problems in running a global internet business: complying with laws of other countries. New York: Practising Law Institute, Order Number 2855.
22. Rosenthal, R. E. (2003). From Zippo to ALS: jurisdiction over IP violations on the internet. Journal of Internet Law, 12-15.
23. Rustad, M. L., & Koenig, T. H. (2006). Harmonizing internet law: lessons from Europe. Journal of Internet Law, 9 (11), 3-11.
24. Sipior, J. C., & Ward, B. T. (2002). A strategic response to the broad spectrum of internet abuse. Information Systems Management, 19 (4), 71-79.
25. Staff. (2004). American Bar Association survey focuses on internet jurisdiction. Daily Record. Rochester, p. 1.
26. Tannenbaum, W. (2003). Questions of internet jurisdiction spin web of confusion for online publishers. New Media and the Law, 27 (1), 33-36.
27. UEJF et LICRA v. Yahoo! Inc. et Yahoo France, Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (No RG: 00/05308, May 22, 2000 and November 20, 2000).
28. Viguerie, R., Keaty, A., & Srivastava, R. (2006). The world wide reach of the internet: can a company protect itself from the jurisdiction of foreign courts? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (1), 87-88.
29. Waldmeir, P. (2003). US court may hear internet jurisdiction case. Financial Times, p. 6.
30. Ward, B. T., & Sipior, J. C. (2010). Where in the World is Internet Jurisdiction: A US Perspective. International Journal of Value Chain Management: ICT adoption and Social-Technical Aspects of ICT, 4 (1/2), 5-17.
31. Ware, R. (2006). The strategic use of American cyberlaw and cyberspace jurisprudence. Managerial Law, 48 (3), 303-321.
32. Whitby, P., & Sims, M. (2002). Internet jurisdiction landmark. Intermedia, 30 (5), 5.
33. Whitehead, R., & Spikes, P. (2003). Determining internet jurisdiction. The CPA Journal, 73 (7), 24.
34. Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119, 1124 (W.D. Pa. 1997).