Inter-comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values in Korea

Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 241-246

  Hee Park, Hoon ^a   Sung Park, Dae ^b   Cheol Kweon, Dae ^c   Bock Lee, Sang ^d   Baek Oh, Ki ^a   Doo Lee, Jong ^a   Hwan Jin, Gye ^d  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Chonnam National University Medical School   (South Korea)

^c Shinhan University   (South Korea)

^d Nambu University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Calibration table; Correlation coefficients; Multicentre trial; PET CT; SUV

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION CONSTANTS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; INTERCOMPARISONS; MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS; MULTICENTRE TRIAL; PET/CT; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUES; SUV;

MEDICAL IMAGING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CALIBRATION;

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CANCER THERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; KOREA; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; KOREA; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958488619     PISSN: 09698043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Biehl K.J., Kong F.M., Dehdashti F., Jin J.Y., Mutic S., El Naqa I., Siegel B.A., Bradley J.D. 18 F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47:1808-1812.
2. Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50(Suppl 1):11S-20S.
3. Boellaard R., Krak N.C., Hoekstra O.S., Lammertsma A.A. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45:1519-1527.
4. Boellaard R., Oyen W.J., Hoekstra C.J., Hoekstra O.S., Visser E.P., Willemsen A.T., Arends B., Verzijlbergen F.J., Zijlstra J., Paans A.M., Comans E.F., Pruim J. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35:2320-2333.
5. Geworski L., Knoop B.O., de Wit M., Ivancevic V., Bares R., Munz D.L. Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners. J. Nucl. Med. 2002, 43:635-639.
6. Jin G.H., Lee S.B., ParK H.H., Kwon D.C., ParK D.S., OH K.B. A Study on the Reliability Assurance in PET/CT Standardized Uptake Values 2008, Korea Food & Drug Administration, Seoul, pp. 49-56.
7. Lim S.M., Cheon G.J., Choi C.W., Kim K.M., Lee J.C. Standardization of Performance Evaluation of PET/CT 2006, Korea Food & Drug Administration, Seoul, pp. 88-94.
8. Lindholm P., Minn H., Leskinen-Kallio S., Bergman J., Ruotsalainen U., Joensuu H. Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer-a PET study. J. Nucl. Med. 1993, 34:1-6.
9. Westerterp M., Pruim J., Oyen W., Hoekstra O., Paans A., Visser E., van Lanschot J., Sloof G., Boellaard R. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2007, 34:392-404.