Improved body cathexis appraisal after circumcision in adult men;Erişkinde sünnet sonrası beden saygısında düzelme

Gulhane Medical Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 185-188

  Adayener, Cüneyt ^a   Ateş, Ferhat ^a   Semiz, Ümit Başar ^a   Soydan, Hasan ^a   Malkoç, Ercan ^a   Şenkul, Temuçin ^a   Baykal, Kadir ^a  

^a GATA HAYDARPASA TRAINING HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adult circumcision; Body cathexis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958485011     PISSN: 13020471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: Prevalance, prophylactic effects and sexual practice. JAMA 1997; 277: 1052-1057.
2. Elder JS. Circumcision. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1553-1564.
3. Wiswell T, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 901-903.
4. Hezog L. Urinary tract infections and circumcision: a case control study. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143: 348-350.
5. Parker S, Stewart AJ, Wren MN, et al. Circumcision and sexually transmissible disease. Med J Aust 1983; 2: 288-290.
6. Task Force on Circumcision. Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 1989; 88: 388-391.
7. Morgan W. Penile plunder. Med J Aust 1967; 1: 1102-1103.
8. Burger R, Guthrie T. Why circumcision? Pediatrics 1974; 54: 362-368.
9. Masters W, Johnson V. Human Sexual Response. Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co, 1966.
10. Goodwin W. Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision. J Urol 1990; 144: 1203-1205.
11. Collins S, Upshaw J, Rutchik S, Ohannessian C, Ortenberg J, Albertsen P. Effects of circumcision on male sexual function: debunking a myth? J Urol 2002; 167: 2111-2112.
12. Senkul T, Iseri C, Sen B, Karademir K, Saracoglu F, Erden D. Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Urology 2004; 63: 155-158.
13. Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 1953; 17: 343-347.
14. Hovardaoǧlu S. The study of reliability and validity of body cathexis scale. Bachelor's Degree Thesis (unpublished), Institute of Social Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara 1990.
15. Sahin F, Beyazova U, Akturk A. Attitudes and practices regarding circumcision in Turkey. Child Care Health Dev 2003; 29: 275-279.
16. American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 686-692.
17. Learman LA. Neonatal circumcision: a dispassionate analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 42: 849-854.
18. Preston EN. Whither the foreskin: A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970; 213: 1853-1857.
19. Bleustein CB, Fogarty JD, Eckholdt H, Arezzo JC, Melman A. Effect of neonatal circumcision on penile neurologic sensation. Urology 2005; 65: 773-777.
20. Fink KS, Carson CC, DeVellis RF. Adult circumcision outcomes study: effect on erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and satisfaction. J Urol 2002; 167: 2113-2116.
21. Masood M, Patel HR, Himpson RC, Palmer JH, Mufti GR, Sheriff MK. Penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction after circumcision:are we informing men correctly. Urol Int 2005; 75: 62-66.
22. Kigozi G, Watya S, Polis CB, et al. The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda. BJU Int 2008; 101: 65-70.
23. Andersen BL, LeGrand J. Body image for women: conseptualization, assessment and a test of its impotence to sexual dysfunction and medical illness. J Sex Res 1991; 28: 457-477.
24. Aydi{dotless}n H. Cinsellik ve Cinsel İşlev. Güleç C, Köroǧlu E (eds). Temel Psikiyatri Cilt 2. Hekimler Yayi{dotless}n Birliǧi, 1998: 605-615.