Reduced-order modeling of transonic flows around an airfoil submitted to small deformations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 230, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 159-184

  Bourguet, Rémi ^a   Braza, Marianna ^b   Dervieux, Alain ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b IMFT   (France)

^c INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Hadamard formulation; Navier Stokes equations; Proper Orthogonal Decomposition; Reduced order modeling; Shape deformation; Transonic regime

Indexed keywords

AIRFOILS; FORECASTING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TRANSONIC AERODYNAMICS; TRANSONIC FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW;

HADAMARD; HADAMARD FORMULATION; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; PROPER ORTHOGONAL; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; REDUCED ORDER MODELLING; REDUCED-ORDER MODEL; SHAPE DEFORMATION; TRANSONIC REGIME;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 77958478968     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. 1901, 2:559-572.
2. Karhunen K. Zur Spektraltheorie stochastischer Prozesse. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. A1 1946, 34.
3. J.L. Lumley, in: A.M. Yaglom, V.I. Tatarski (Eds.), Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation, Nauka, Moscow, 1967.
4. Deane A., Kevrekidis I., Karniadakis G.E., Orszag S. Low-dimensional models for complex geometry flows: application to grooved channels and circular cylinders. Phys. Fluids A 1991, 3(10):2337-2354.
5. Cazemier W., Verstappen R.W.C.P., Veldman A.E.P. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows. Phys. Fluids 1998, 10(7):1685-1699.
6. Ma X., Karniadakis G.E. A low-dimensional model for simulating three-dimensional cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2002, 458:181-190.
7. Noack B.R., Afanasiev K., Morzynski M., Tadmor G., Thiele F. A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 2003, 497:335-363.
8. Galletti B., Bruneau C.H., Zannetti L., Iollo A. Low-order modelling of laminar flow regimes past a confined square cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 503:161-170.
9. Noack B., Papas P., Monkewitz P. The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 2005, 523:339-365.
10. Buffoni M., Camarri S., Iollo A., Salvetti M.V. Low-dimensional modelling of a confined three-dimensional wake flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 569:141-150.
11. Couplet M., Basdevant C., Sagaut P. Calibrated reduced-order POD-Galerkin system for fluid flow modelling. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 207:192-220.
12. Luchtenburg D.M., Günter B., Noack B.R., King R., Tadmor G. A generalized mean-field model of the natural and high-frequency actuated flow around a high-lift configuration. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 623:283-316.
13. Venturi D., Wan X., Karniadakis G. Stochastic low-dimensional modelling of a random laminar wake past a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 2008, 606:339-367.
14. Lucia D.J., Beran P.S. Projection methods for reduced order models of compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2003, 188:252-280.
15. Hall K., Thomas J., Dowell E. Proper orthogonal decomposition technique for transonic aerodynamic flows. AIAA J. 2000, 38(10):1853-1862.
16. Epureanu B.I., Dowell E.H., Hall K.C. Reduced-order models of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachinary using viscous-inviscid coupling. J. Fluids Struct. 2001, 15:255-273.
17. Willcox K., Peraire J., Paduano J. Application of model order reduction to compressor aeroelastic models. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 2002, 124(2):332-339.
18. Thomas J., Dowell E., Hall K. Three-dimensional transonic aeroelasticity using proper orthogonal decomposition-based reduced-order models. J. Aircraft 2003, 40(3):544-551.
19. Lieu T., Farhat C. Adaptation of aeroelastic reduced-order models and application to an F-16 configuration. AIAA J. 2007, 45(6):1244-1257.
20. J. Thomas, E. Dowell, K. Hall, Using automatic differentiation to create a nonlinear reduced order model of a computational fluid dynamic solver, AIAA Paper 7115, 2006.
21. Rowley C.W., Colonius T., Murray R.M. Model reduction for compressible flows using POD and Galerkin projection. Physica D 2004, 189(1-2):115-129.
22. G. Vigo, A. Dervieux, M. Mallet, M. Ravachol, B. Stoufflet, Extension of methods based on the proper orthogonal decomposition to the simulation of unsteady compressible Navier-Stokes flows, in: CFD'98, Proc. Fourth ECCOMAS Conf., Wiley, 1998, pp. 648-653.
23. Bourguet R., Braza M., Dervieux A. Reduced-order modeling for unsteady transonic flows around an airfoil. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19:111704.
24. Graham W.R., Peraire J., Tang K.Y. Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models, Part I - open-loop model development. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 1999, 44(7):945-972.
25. Graham W.R., Peraire J., Tang K.Y. Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models, Part II - model-based control. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 1999, 44(7):973-990.
26. Ravindran S. A reduced-order approach for optimal control of fluids using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2000, 34:425-448.
27. Bergmann M., Cordier L., Brancher J.P. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using POD Reduced Order Model. Phys. Fluids 2005, 3:1-21.
28. P.A. Le Gresley, J.J. Alonso, Investigation of non-linear projection for POD based reduced order models for aerodynamics, AIAA Paper 0926, 2001.
29. Anttonen J.S.R., King P.I., Beran P.S. POD-based reduced-order models with deforming grids. Math. Comput. Model. 2003, 38(1-2):41-62.
30. L.N. Sankar, S.Y. Ruo, J.B. Malone, Application of surface transpiration in computational aerodynamics, AIAA Paper 0511, 1986.
31. Vázquez M., Koobus B., Dervieux A. Multilevel optimisation of a supersonic aircraft. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2004, 40(15):2101-2124.
32. C.L. Pettit, P.S. Beran, Reduced-order modeling for flutter prediction, AIAA Paper 1446, 2000.
33. A. Bouhadji, Analyse physique par simulation numérique de phénomènes de transition bi-et tridimensionnels dans l'écoulement compressible, visqueux autour d'une aile d'avion, Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 1998.
34. Bouhadji A., Braza M. Organised modes and shock-vortex interaction in unsteady viscous transonic flows around an aerofoil, Part I. Comput. Fluids 2003, 32(9):1233-1260.
35. Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1981, 43:357-372.
36. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 1979, 32:101-136.
37. Hirsch C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows 1990, vol. 2. Wiley.
38. Bouhadji A., Braza M. Organised modes and shock-vortex interaction in unsteady viscous transonic flows around an aerofoil, Part II: Reynolds number effect. Comput. Fluids 2003, 32(9):1261-1281.
39. McDevitt J.B., Levy L.L., Deiwert G.S. Transonic flow about a thick circular-arc airfoil. AIAA J. 1976, 14(5):606-613.
40. Seegmiller H.L., Marvin J.G., Levy L.L. Steady and unsteady transonic flow. AIAA J. 1978, 16(12):1262-1270.
41. Berkooz G., Holmes P., Lumley J.L. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1993, 25:539-575.
42. Lumley J.L., Poje A. Low-dimensional models for flows with density fluctuations. Phys. Fluids 1997, 9(7):2023-2031.
43. Sirovich L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, Part I-III. Quart. Appl. Math. 1987, 45:561-590.
44. Rempfer D. On low-dimensional galerkin models for fluid flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2000, 14(2):75-88.
45. Aubry N., Holmes P., Lumley J.L., Stone E. The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1988, 192:115-173.
46. Sirisup S., Karniadakis G.E. A spectral viscosity method for correcting the long-term behavior of POD model. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 194:92-116.
47. Bergmann M., Bruneau C.H., Iollo A. Enablers for robust POD models. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228(2):516-538.
48. Tikhonov A.N., Arsenin V.A. Solutions of Ill-posed Problems 1977, Winston, Washington.
49. Cordier L., Abou El Majd B., Favier J. Calibration of POD reduced-order models by Tikhonov regularization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2010, 63(2):269-296.
50. Bourguet R., Braza M., Sévrain A., Bouhadji A. Capturing transition features around a wing by reduced-order modeling based on compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Phys. Fluids 2009, 21:094104.
51. Anttonen J.S.R., King P.I., Beran P.S. Applications of multi-POD to a pitching and plunging airfoil. Math. Comput. Model. 2005, 42(3-4):245-259.
52. M. Morzyński, W. Stankiewicz, B.R. Noack, F. Thiele, G. Tadmor, Generalized mean-field model with continuous mode interpolation for flow control, AIAA Paper 3488, 2006.
53. Peskin C.S. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 2002, 11:479-517.
54. A. Dervieux, Perturbation deséquations d'équilibre d'un plasma confiné: comportement de la frontère libre,étude des branches de solutions, R.R. INRIA 0018, 1980.
55. Beux F., Dervieux A. Extract-gradient shape optimization of a 2D Euler flow. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 1992, 12:281-302.
56. A. Dervieux, Y. Mesri, F. Courty, L. Hascoet, B. Koobus, M. Vazquez, Calculs de sensibilité par différentation pour l'aérodynamique, in: ESAIM: Proceedings, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 181-189.
57. Hadamard J. Mémoire sur le problème d'analyse relatifà l'équilibre des plaquesélastiques encastrées, (1908) 1968, CNRS, Paris.
58. Garabedian P.R. Partial Differential Equations 1964, Wiley, New York.
59. E. Arian, M. Fahl, E.W. Sachs, Trust-region proper orthogonal decomposition for flow control, Icase Report 25, 2000.
60. Amsallem D., Farhat C. Interpolation method for adapting reduced-order models and application to aeroelasticity. AIAA J. 2008, 46(7):1803-1813.
61. Bergmann M., Cordier L. Optimal control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime by trust-region methods and POD reduced-order models. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:7813-7840.
62. Caraballo E., Kasnakoĝlu C., Serrani A., Samimy M. Input separation methods for reduced-order model-based feedback flow control. AIAA J. 2008, 46(9):2306-2322.
63. Kasnakoĝlu C., Serrani A., Efe M.O. Control input separation by actuation mode expansion for flow control problems. Int. J. Control 2008, 81(9):1475-1492.