Method for testing motion analysis laboratory measurement systems

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 132, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Hakkarainen, Marko J ^a   Bragge, Timo ^a   Liikavainio, Tuomas ^b   Arokoski, Jari ^b   Karjalainen, Pasi A ^a   Tarvainen, Mika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D MOTION CAPTURE; ACCELEROMETER DATA; ACCELEROMETER MEASUREMENT; EQUATION GROUPS; FORCE PLATFORM; GAUSS-NEWTON METHODS; LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS; MOTION ANALYSIS; MOTION CAPTURE; MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; OPTICAL MOTION CAPTURE; TEMPORAL DIFFERENCES; TEST DEVICE; TESTING METHOD;

ACCELEROMETERS; ACCREDITATION; CAMERAS; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS;

LABORATORIES;

ACCELEROMETER; ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; OPTICAL MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; ORIENTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ACCELERATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ACCELERATION; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION; MOVEMENT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77958475391     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4002368     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cappozzo A. Croce U.D. Leardini A. Chiari L. Human Movement Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry-Part 1: Theoretical Background. Gait and Posture 2005, 21(2):186-196. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(04)00025-6
2. Moe-Nilssen R. A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions. Part 2: Gait Analysis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 1998, 13(4-5):328-335. 0268-0033, 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00090-4
3. Selles R.W. Formanoy M.A. G. Bussmann J.B. J. Janssens P.J. Stam H.J. Automated Estimation of Initial and Terminal Contact Timing Using Accelerometers; Development and Validation in Transtibial Amputees and Controls. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2005, 13(1):81-88. ITNSB3, 1534-4320, 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843176
4. Mayagoitia R.E. Lotters J.C. Veltink P.H. Hermens H. Standing Balance Evaluation Using a Triaxial Accelerometer. Gait and Posture 2002, 16(1):55-59. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00199-0
5. Moe-Nilssen R. Helbostad J.L. Trunk Accelerometry as a Measure of Balance Control During Quiet Standing. Gait and Posture 2002, 16(1):60-68. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00200-4
6. Zijlstra W. Hof A.L. Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters From Trunk Accelerations During Human Walking. Gait and Posture 2003, 18(2):1-10. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X
7. Willemsen A.T. Frigo C. Boom H.B. Lower Extremity Angle Measurement With Accelerometers-Error and Sensitivity Analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1991, 38(12):1186-1193. IEBEAX, 0018-9294, 10.1109/10.137284
8. Willemsen A.T. Van Alst J.A. Boom H.B. Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry. J. Biomech. 1990, 23(8):859-863. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90033-Y
9. Holden J.P. Selbie W.S. Stanhope S.J. A Proposed Test to Support the Clinical Movement Analysis Laboratory Accreditation Process. Gait and Posture 2003, 17(3):205-213. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00088-7
10. Liikavainio T. Bragge T. Hakkarainen M. Jurvelin J.S. Karjalainen P.A. Arokoski J.P. Reproducibility of Loading Measurements With Skin-Mounted Accelerometers During Walking. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007, 88(7):907-915. APMHAI, 0003-9993, 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.031
11. Lawson C.L. Hanson R. Solving Least Squares Problems 1995, and SIAM.
12. Wilson H.B. Turcotte L.H. Halpern D. Advanced Mathematics and Mechanics Applications Using MATLAB 2003, and 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Oppenheim A.V. Schafer R.W. Discrete-Time Signal Processing 2010, and 3rd ed., Pearson.