Potential uses of the Rorschach in the selection of police officers

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 63-70

  Weiss, Peter A ^a  

^a North Central Bronx Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958470013     PISSN: 08820783     EISSN: 19366469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02807116     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Acklin, M. W. (1997). Psychodiagnosis of personality structure: Borderline personality organization. In J. R. Meloy, M. W. Acklin, C. B. Gacono, J. F. Murray, & C. A. Peterson (Eds.), Contemporary Rorschach interpretation (pp. 109-121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U. S., 113 S. Ct 2786 (1993).
3. nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
4. rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
5. Exner, J. E., Jr. (2000)A primer for Rorschach interpretation. Ashville, NC: Rorschach Workshops.
6. nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
7. Ganellen, R. J. (1994). Attempting to conceal psychological disturbance: MMPI defensive response sets and the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 423-437.
8. Ganellen, R. J. (1996). Integrating the Rorschach and the MMPI-2 in personality assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ganellen, R. J. (2001). Weighing evidence for the Rorschach=s validity: A response to Wood et al. (1999). Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 1-15.
10. rd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
11. nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, RF., Berry, D. T. R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative mera-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278-296.
13. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999).
14. Meloy, J. R., & Murray, J. F. (1997). Introduction. In J. R. Meloy, M. W. Acklin, C. B. Gacono, J. F. Murray, & C. A. Peterson (Eds.), Contemporary Rorschach interpretation (pp. 1-7). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Ritzler, B., Erard, R., & Pettigrew, G. (in press). Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses: A reply to Grove and Barden (1999) Re: The admissibility of testimony underDaubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law.
16. Smith, S. R., Baity, M. R., Knowles, E. S., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2001). Assessment of disordered thinking in children and adolescents: The Rorschach perceptual-thinking index. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 447-463.
17. Viglione, D. J. (1999). A review of recent research addressing the utility of the Rorschach. Psychological Assessment, 11, 251-265.
18. Weiss, W. U., Johnson, J., Serafino, G., & Serafino, A. (2001). A three-year follow-up of the performance of a class of state police academy graduates using the MMPI-2. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 16, 51-55.
19. Zacker, J. (1997). Rorschach responses of police applicants. Psychological Reports, 80, 523-528.