Comparison of diagnostic performances of three different software packages in detecting coronary artery disease

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2070-2078

  Guner, Levent A ^a   Karabacak, Nese Ilgin ^a   Cakir, Tansel ^a   Akdemir, Ozgur U ^a   Kocaman, Sinan A ^a   Cengel, Atiye ^a   Unlu, Mustafa ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; Quantification; Receiver operating characteristic

Indexed keywords

THALLIUM 201;

4D MSPECT; ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMORY CARDIAC TOOLBOX; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE PERFUSION SPECT; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 77958456138     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1522-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. P Rochmis H Blackburn 1971 Exercise tests. A survey of procedures, safety, and litigation experience in approximately 170,000 tests JAMA 217 1061 1066 1:STN:280:DyaE3M3nslGmtQ%3D%3D 10.1001/jama.217.8.1061 5109427
2. MD Cerqueira MS Verani M Schwaiger J Heo AS Iskandrian 1994 Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry J Am Coll Cardiol 23 384 389 1:STN:280: DyaK2c7isVyhuw%3D%3D 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3 8294691
3. A Abreu JJ Mahmarian S Nishimura TM Boyce MS Verani 1991 Tolerance and safety of pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine in association with thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with suspected coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 18 730 735 1:STN:280:DyaK3Mzjt1ehsA%3D%3D 10.1016/0735-1097(91) 90796-C 1869736
4. J Lette JL Tatum S Fraser DD Miller DD Waters G Heller, et al. 1995 Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: the Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study J Nucl Cardiol 2 3 17 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fot1ehtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S1071-3581(05)80003-0 9420757
5. H Mertes SG Sawada T Ryan DS Segar R Kovacs J Foltz, et al. 1993 Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Experience in 1118 patients Circulation 88 15 19 1:STN:280:DyaK3szgs1OqtQ%3D%3D 8319327
6. J Candell-Riera C Santana-Boado B Bermejo L Armadans J Castell I Casáns, et al. 2001 Interhospital observer agreement in interpretation of exercise myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT studies J Nucl Cardiol 8 49 57 10.1067/mnc.2001.110388 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ksFGltg%3D%3D 10.1067/mnc.2001.110388 11182709
7. M Brambilla E Inglese G Cannizzaro M Dondi R Sara F Arrigo, et al. 1994 A multicenter trial on interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of segmental scoring of thallium-201 planar myocardial imaging before and after reinjection. Italian Group of Nuclear Cardiology J Nucl Med 35 601 608 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3gtFyksg%3D%3D 8151382
8. EV Garcia TL Faber CD Cooke RD Folks J Chen C Santana 2007 The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach J Nucl Cardiol 14 420 432 S1071-3581(07)00297-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06. 009 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.009 17679051
9. G Germano PB Kavanagh PJ Slomka SD Van Kriekinge G Pollard DS Berman 2007 Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach J Nucl Cardiol 14 433 454 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.008 17679052
10. L Akesson A Svensson L Edenbrandt 2004 Operator dependent variability in quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion images Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 24 374 379 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2004.00574.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crltVKitQ%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2004.00574.x 15522047
11. HJ Verberne JB Habraken EA van Royen MM Tiel-van Buul JJ Piek BL van Eck-Smit 2001 Quantitative analysis of 99Tcm-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT using a three-dimensional reference heart: a comparison with experienced observers Nucl Med Commun 22 155 163 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzlsVeksQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00006231-200102000-00007 11258402
12. A Wolak PJ Slomka MB Fish S Lorenzo W Acampa DS Berman, et al. 2008 Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages J Nucl Cardiol 15 27 34 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.09.020 18242477
13. A Svensson L Akesson L Edenbrandt 2004 Quantification of myocardial perfusion defects using three different software packages Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 229 232 10.1007/s00259-003-1361-4 15129705
14. D Knollmann I Knebel KC Koch M Gebhard T Krohn U Buell, et al. 2008 Comparison of SSS and SRS calculated from normal databases provided by QPS and 4D-MSPECT manufacturers and from identical institutional normals Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35 311 318 10.1007/s00259-007-0600-5 17922271
15. JA Hanley BJ McNeil 1983 A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 839 843 1:STN:280:DyaL3s3nsVKgtg%3D%3D 6878708
16. C Marcassa JJ Bax F Bengel B Hesse CL Petersen E Reyes, et al. 2008 Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a position statement Eur Heart J 29 557 563 10.1093/eurheartj/ ehm607 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm607 18202253
17. T Nishimura K Nakajima H Kusuoka A Yamashina S Nishimura 2008 Prognostic study of risk stratification among Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: J-ACCESS study Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35 319 328 10.1007/s00259-007-0608-x 17926033
18. R Hachamovitch DS Berman H Kiat I Cohen JA Cabico J Friedman, et al. 1996 Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification Circulation 93 905 914 1:STN:280:DyaK287nvFShsg%3D%3D 8598081
19. R Hachamovitch SW Hayes JD Friedman I Cohen DS Berman 2004 Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD J Am Coll Cardiol 43 200 208 S0735109703014268 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.043 14736438
20. K Nakajima K Okuda M Kawano S Matsuo P Slomka G Germano, et al. 2009 The importance of population-specific normal database for quantification of myocardial ischemia: comparison between Japanese 360 and 180-degree databases and a US database J Nucl Cardiol 16 422 430 10.1007/s12350-009-9049-1 19190975
21. CW White CB Wright DB Doty LF Hiratza CL Eastham DG Harrison, et al. 1984 Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 310 819 824 1:STN:280: DyaL2c7kt1WgsA%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM198403293101304 6700670
22. J Toft D Lindahl M Ohlsson J Palmer A Lundin L Edenbrandt, et al. 2001 The optimal reference population for cardiac normality in myocardial SPET in the detection of coronary artery stenoses: patients with normal coronary angiography or subjects with low likelihood of coronary artery disease? Eur J Nucl Med 28 831 835 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkvVWltLw%3D 10.1007/s002590100538 11504079
23. PJ Slomka H Nishina DS Berman X Kang JD Friedman SW Hayes, et al. 2004 Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia J Nucl Med 45 183 191 14960634