The prominence of qualitative research in criminology and criminal justice scholarship

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 391-411

  Tewksbury, Richard ^a   Dabney, Dean A ^b   Copes, Heith ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958450500     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2010.516557     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Buckler, K. 2008. The quantitative/qualitative divide revisited: A study of published research, doctoral program curricula, and journal editor perceptions. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 19: 383-403.
2. DiChristina, B. 1997. The quantitative emphasis in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 8: 181-199.
3. Glueck, S., and E. Glueck. 1950. Unraveling juvenile delinquency. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
4. Glueck, S., and E. Glueck. 1968. Delinquents and nondelinquents in perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Kleck, G., J. Tark, and J. J. Bellows. 2006. What methods are most frequently used in research in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice 34: 147-152.
6. Laub, J. H. 2006. Edwin Sutherland and the Michael-Adler report: Searching for the soul of criminology seventy years later. Criminology 44: 235-257.
7. Miller, J. 2005. The status of qualitative research in criminology. Proceedings from the National Science Foundation's Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research. Retrieved May 26, 2010, from http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/nsfqual/Miller%20Paper.pdf
8. Nagin, D. S., and R. E. Tremblay. 2005a. Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology 43: 873-899.
9. Nagin, D. S., and R. E. Tremblay. 2005b. From seduction to passion: A response to Sampson and Laub. Criminology 43: 915-918.
10. Pogrebin, M. 2010. On the way to the field: Reflections of one qualitative criminal justice professor's experiences. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21: 540-561.
11. Sampson, R. J., and J. H. Laub. 2005. Seductions of method: Rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay's "Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or fiction?" Criminology 43: 905-913.
12. Sever, B. 2001. Research methods for criminal justice graduate students: Comparing textbook coverage and classroom instruction. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 12: 337-353.
13. Sorensen, J., C. Snell, and J. J. Rodriguez. 2006. An assessment of criminal justice and criminology journal prestige. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 17: 297-322.
14. Tewksbury, R., M. T. DeMichele, and J. M. Miller. 2005. Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice's top journals: Who publishes what and where. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 16: 265-279.
15. Worrall, J. L. 2000. In defense of the "quantoids": More on the reasons for the quantitative emphasis in criminal justice education and research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 11: 353-360.