A continuous hockey stick stock-recruit model for estimating MSY reference points

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1780-1784

  Mesnil, Benoit ^a   Rochet, Marie Joëlle ^a  

^a IFREMER   (France)

Author keywords

bent hyperbola; FMSY; hockey stick; MSY; stock recruitment

Indexed keywords

FISHERY POLICY; MAXIMUM SUSTAINABLE YIELD; POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); STOCK ASSESSMENT;

MATTHIOLA INCANA;

EID: 77958195793     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq055     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barrowman, N. J., and Myers, R. A. 2000. Still more spawnerrecruitment curves: the hockey stick and its generalizations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57: 665-676.
2. Beverton, R. J. H. 2002. Man or nature in fisheries dynamics: who calls the tune? In The Raymond J. H. Beverton Lectures atWoods Hole, Massachusetts. Three Lectures on Fisheries Science Given 2-3 May 1994, pp. 9-59. Ed. by E. D. Anderson. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-54. 161 pp.
3. Butterworth, D. S., and Bergh, M. O. 1993. The development of a management procedure for the South African anchovy resource. In Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management, pp. 83-99. Ed. by S. J. Smith, J. J. Hunt, and D. Rivard. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 120. 442 pp.
4. Cadigan, N. G. 2006. Local influence diagnostics for quasi-likelihood and lognormal estimates of a biological reference point from some fish stock and recruitment models. Biometrics, 62: 713-720.
5. Cadigan, N. G. 2009. Sensitivity of common estimators of management parameters derived from stock-recruit relationships. Fisheries Research, 96: 195-205.
6. Cadigan, N. G., and Healey, B. 2004. Confidence intervals for the change point in a stock-recruit model: a simulation study of the profile likelihood method based on the logistic hockey stick model. Paper Presented at a meeting of the ICES Working Group on Methods of Fish Stock Assessment, Lisbon, February 2004. ICES Document CM 2004/D: 03. 232 pp.
7. Clark, C. W., Charles, A. T., Beddington, J. R., and Mangel, M. 1985. Optimal capacity decisions in a developing fishery. Marine Resource Economics, 2: 25-54.
8. Daan, N. (Ed). 2007. Fisheries Management Strategies: Proceedings of an ICES Symposium held in Galway, Ireland, 27-30 June 2006. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 577-862.
9. ICES. 2002. Report of the Study Group on the Further Development of the Precautionary Approach to Fishery Management, Lisbon, Portugal, 4-8 March 2002. ICES Document CM 2002/ACFM 10. 157
10. ICES. 2003. Report of the Study Group on Precautionary Reference Points for Advice on Fishery Management, ICES Headquarters, 24-26 February 2003. ICES Document CM 2003/ACFM 15.81 pp.
11. ICES. 2007. Report of the Workshop on Limit and Target Reference Points (WKREF), 29 January-2 February 2007, Gdynia, Poland. ICES Document CM 2007/ACFM05. 89 pp.
12. ICES. 2009a. Chair's Report of the Workshop on the Form of Advice (WKFORM), 1-3 December 2009, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES Document CM 2009/ACOM53.15 pp
13. ICES. 2009b. Report of the working group on the assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak (WGNSSK), 6- 12 May 2009, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES Document CM 2009/ACOM 10.1028 pp
14. ICES. 2009c. Report of the Benchmark and Data Compilation Workshop for Roundfish (WKROUND), 16-23 January 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark. ICES Document CM 2009/ACOM: 32. 259 pp.
15. Lassen, H., and Medley, P. 2000. Virtual population analysis. A practical manual for stock assessment. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 400. 129 pp.
16. Laurec, A., and Le Guen, J. C. 1981. Dynamique des populations marines exploitées. 1. Concepts et modèles. CNEXO Rapports Scientifiques et Techniques, 45. 117 pp.
17. Myers, R. A., and Barrowman, N. J. 1996. Is fish recruitment related to spawner abundance? Fishery Bulletin US, 94: 707-724.
18. Punt, A. E., and Smith, A. D. M. 2001. The gospel of maximum sustainable yield in fisheries management: birth, crucifixion and reincarnation. In Conservation of Exploited Species, pp. 41-66. Ed. by J. D. Reynolds, G. M. Mace, K. H. Redford, and J. G. Robinson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 548 pp.
19. Quinn, T. J., and Deriso, R. B. 1999. Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York. 542 pp.
20. Seber, G. A. F., andWild, C. J. 1989. Nonlinear Regression. JohnWiley, New York. 768 pp.
21. Shepherd, J. G. 1982. A versatile new stock-recruitment relationship for fisheries, and the construction of sustainable yield curves. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 40: 67-75.
22. Sissenwine, M. P., and Shepherd, J. G. 1987. An alternative perspective on recruitment overfishing and biological reference points. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44: 913-918.
23. Toms, J. D., and Lesperance, M. L. 2003. Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology, 84: 2034-2041.
24. Watts, D. G., and Bacon, D.W. 1984. Using a hyperbola as a transition model to fit two-regime straight-line data. Technometrics, 16: 369-373.