Evidence-based medicine, the research-practice gap, and biases in medical and surgical decision making in dermatology

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 146, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1161-1164

  Eaglstein, William H ^a,b  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SHORT SURVEY; SKIN SURGERY; DECISION THEORY; DERMATOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS; SURGERY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DECISION THEORY; DERMATOLOGY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 77958192814     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: 15383652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.266     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Antman K, Amato D, Wood W, et al. Selection bias in clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1985;3(8):1142-1147.
2. Taylor KM, Feldstein ML, Skeel RT, Pandya KJ, Ng P, Carbone PP. Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(9):1796-1805.
3. Zarin DA, Young JL, West JC. Challenges to evidence- based medicine: a comparison of patients and treatments in randomized controlled trials with patients and treatments in a practice research network. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(1):27-35.
4. Sox HC, Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):203-205.
5. Report to the president and the congress on comparative effectiveness research. HHS.gov/Recovery Web site. http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs /cer/execsummary.html. Accessed June 1, 2010.
6. Neumann PJ, Tunis SR. Medicare and medical technology - the growing demand for relevant outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):377-379.
7. Redelmeier DA, Shafir E. Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA. 1995;273(4):302-305.
8. Aberegg SK, Arkes H, Terry PB. Failure to adopt beneficial therapies caused by bias in medical evidence evaluation. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):575-582. (Pubitemid 44728773)
9. Abdelmalek M, Spencer J. Retinoids and wound healing. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(10):1219-1230.
10. Royzman E, Baron J. The preference for indirect harm. Soc Justice Res. 2002;15(2):165-184.
11. Wade N. Is "do unto others" written into our genes? New York Times. September 18, 2007:D6.
12. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(6):995-1006.