Assessment of different surveillance systems for avian influenza in commercial poultry in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain)

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 107-118

  Alba, A ^a   Casal, J ^a,b   Napp, S ^a   Martin, P A J ^c  

^a CENTRE DE RECERCA EN SANITAT ANIMAL CRESA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Avian influenza; Domestic poultry; Scenario tree model; Spain; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFLUENZA; CHICKEN; DUCK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; GOOSE; INFECTION CONTROL; MALE; METHODOLOGY; POULTRY; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; SPAIN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DUCKS; FEMALE; GEESE; INFECTION CONTROL; INFLUENZA IN BIRDS; MALE; POULTRY; SENTINEL SURVEILLANCE; SEROEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; SPAIN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TURKEYS;

ANSER; AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO;

EID: 77958188687     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alexander D.J., Brown I.H. History of highly pathogenic avian influenza. Rev. Sci. Technol. 2009, 28:19-38.
2. Anonymous, 2006a. SANCO/10268/2006.Guidelines on the implementation of survey programmes for Avian Influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the Member States in 2007. Commission, E. (Ed). (SANCO/10268/2006). pp. 3-22. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/diseases/eradication/guidelines_SANCO_10268_2006_en.pdf.
3. Anonymous, 2006b. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación. Secretaría General de Agricultura y Alimentación. Dirección General de Ganadería. Subdirección General de Sanidad Animal, 2007. Plan de Vigilancia de la Influenza Aviar en España, 2007.
4. Anonymous, 2007 European Commission, Decision 2007/268/EC on the implementation of surveillance programmes for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds to be carried out in the Member States and amending Decision 2004/450/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2007, 115:3. http://eur-ex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:115:0003:0017:EN:PDF.
5. Anonymous, 2007b. Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación. Secretaría General de Agricultura y Alimentación. Dirección General de Ganadería. Subdirección General de Sanidad Animal. Programa de Vigilancia de la Influenza Aviar en España 2008, 30 abril 2007.
6. Anonymous, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Medio Rural y Marino. Secretaría General de Medio Rural. Dirección General de Recursos Agrícolas y Ganaderos. Subdirección General de Sanidad Animal, 2008. Programa de Vigilancia de la Influenza Aviar en España, 2009, 30 de abril de 2008.
7. Brown J.D., Stallknecht D.E., Berghaus R.D., Luttrell M.P., Velek K., Kistler W., Costa T., Yabsley M.J., Swayne D. Evaluation of a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect avian influenza virus antibodies in multiple experimentally infected avian species. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16:824-829.
8. Cannon R.M. Demonstrating disease freedom - combining confidence levels. Prev. Vet. Med. 2002, 52:227-249.
9. Frossling J., Agren E.C., Eliasson-Selling L., Lewerin S.S. Probability of freedom from disease after the first detection and eradication of PRRS in Sweden: scenario-tree modelling of the surveillance system. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 91:137-145.
10. Hadorn D.C., Racloz V., Schwermer H., Stark K.D. Establishing a cost-effective national surveillance system for Bluetongue using scenario tree modelling. Vet. Res. 2009, 40:57.
11. Hadorn D.C., Stärk K.D. Evaluation and optimization of surveillance systems for rare and emerging infectious diseases. Vet. Res. 2008, 39(6):57.
12. Hesterberg, U., Young, N., Cook, A., Brown, I., 2008. Annual Report on surveillance for avian influenza in poultry in the EU during 2007. Community Reference Laboratory for avian influenza Veterinary Laboratory Agency (VLA), SANCO/2179/2008 Rev.1 http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/diseases/controlmeasures/avian/res_surv_wb_annual_07_en.pdf.
13. Knight-Jones T.J., Hauser R., Matthes D., Stark K.D. Evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of wild bird surveillance for avian influenza. Vet. Res. 2010, 41:50.
14. Martin P.A.J., Cameron A.R., Greiner M. Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources. 1: A new methodology based on scenario trees. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 79:71-97.
15. Martin P.A.J. Current value of historical and ongoing surveillance for disease freedom: surveillance for bovine Johne's disease in Western Australia. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 84:291-309.
16. Meah, M.N., Lewis, G.A., 1999. A review of veterinary surveillance in England and Wales with special reference to work supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food - the report to the Permanent Secretary (London, MAFF), 111. http://www.maff.gov.uk/inf/publicns/pubcat/pol.htm%23vs5.
17. McQuiston J.H., Garber L.P., Porter-Spalding B.A., Hahn J.W., Pierson F.W., Wainwright S.H., Senne D.A., Brignole T.J., Akey B.L., Holt T.J. Evaluation of risk factors for the spread of low pathogenicity H7N2 avian influenza virus among commercial poultry farms. JAVMA 2005, 226(5):767-772.
18. Needham H. Influenza team (ECDC). H5N1 in wild and domestic birds in Europe - remaining vigilant in response to an ongoing public health threat. Euro. Surveill. 2007, 12(49). http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx%3FArticleId=3324.
19. Nishiguchi A., Kobayashi S., Yamamoto T., Ouchi Y., Sugizaki T., Tsutsui T. Risk factors for the introduction of avian influenza virus into commercial layer chicken farms during the outbreaks caused by a low-pathogenic H5N2 virus in Japan in 2005. Zoonoses Public Health 2007, 54:337-343.
20. Perez D.R., Lim W., Seiler J.P., Yi G., Peiris M., Shortridge K.F., Webster R.G. Role of quail in the interspecies transmission of H9 influenza A viruses: molecular changes on HA that correspond to adaptation from ducks to chickens. J. Virol. 2003, 77:3148-3156.
21. Salman M.D. Surveillance and monitoring systems for animal health programs and diseases surveys. In Animal Disease Surveillance and Survey Systems: Methods and Applications 2003, 3-13. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. M.D. Salman (Ed.).
22. Spickler A.R., Trampel D.W., Roth J.A. The onset of virus shedding and clinical signs in chickens infected with high-pathogenicity and low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses. Avian Pathol. 2008, 37:555-577.
23. Swayne D. Epidemiology of avian influenza in agricultura and other man-made systems. Avian Influenza 2008, 59-85. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. 1st ed. D.E. Swayne (Ed.).
24. Swayne D.E., Slemons R.D. Using mean infectious dose of high- and low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses originating from wild duck and poultry as one measure of infectivity and adaptation to poultry. Avian Dis. 2008, 52(3):455-460.
25. Tumpey T.M., Kapczynski D.R., Swayne D.E. Comparative susceptibility of chickens and turkeys to avian influenza A H7N2 virus infection and protective efficacy of a commercial avian influenza H7N2 virus vaccine. Avian Dis. 2004, 48:167-176.
26. Vose D. Risk Analysis 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester. second ed.
27. Woo J.T., Park B.K. Seroprevalence of low pathogenic avian influenza (H9N2) and associated risk factors in the Gyeonggi-do of Korea during 2005-2006. J. Vet. Sci. 2008, 9(2):161-168.
28. Yamamoto T., Tsutsui T., Nishiguchi A., Kobayashi S., Tsukamoto K., Saito T., Mase M., Okamatsu M. Preliminary evaluation of diagnostic tests for avian influenza using the markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method in an emergency surveillance. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2007, 69(6):673-675.
29. Zhou E.M., Chan M., Heckert R.A., Riva J., Cantin M.F. Evaluation of a competitive ELISA for detection of antibodies against avian influenza virus nucleoprotein. Avian Dis. 1998, 42(3):517-522.