Analysis of small-scale biogas utilization systems on Ontario cattle farms

Renewable Energy

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1019-1025

  White, Andrew J ^a   Kirk, Donald W ^a   Graydon, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Feed In Tariff; Small scale

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS PLANTS; BIOGAS UTILIZATION; CATTLE MANURES; DAIRY FARMS; ELECTRICAL GRIDS; FEED-IN TARIFF; ONTARIO; RENEWABLE ENERGY CAPACITY; SMALL SCALE;

ANIMALS; BIOGAS; FARMS; MANURES; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; CATTLE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; LIVESTOCK FARMING; MANURE; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 77958182012     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.034     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bari S. Effect of carbon dioxide on the performance of biogas/diesel duel-fuel engine. In: World Renewable Energy Congress Conference, June 1996, Denver, CO, USA.
2. Batzias F.A., Sidiras D.K., Spyrou E.K. Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method. Renew Energ 2005, 30:1161-1176.
3. Burke D.A. Dairy waste anaerobic digestion handbook June 2001, Environmental Energy Company, Available from:, [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.makingenergy.com/Dairy%2520Waste%2520Handbook.pdf.
4. Choi D.-Y., Lee J.-W., Jang S.-C., Ahn B.-S., Choi D.-K. Adsorption dynamics of hydrogen sulphide in impregnated activated carbon bed. Adsorption 2008, 14:533-538.
5. Cuéllar A.D., Webber M.E. Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environ Res Lett 2008, 3:034002. (8 pp.).
6. DeBruyn J., House H., Rodenburg J. Ontario large herd operators European anaerobic digestion tour report: Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands August 21-29, 2006, Ontario Large Herd Operators, Available from:, [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.lho-ontario.ca/PDF/European%2520Anaerobic%2520Digester%2520Tour%2520Report%2520FINAL.pdf.
7. DeBruyn J, Hilborn D. Anaerobic digestion basics, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Fact Sheet Order No. 07-057, October 2007.
8. Gangloff C. Environmental concerns driving activated carbon market. Water Technology Magazine 1999, 22. Available from:, [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.watertechonline.com/article.asp%3FIndexID%3D5220504.
9. Independent electricity system operator monthly market report, December 2009. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.ieso.com/imoweb/pubs/marketReports/monthly/2009dec.pdf.
10. Lazarus W.F., Rudstrom M. The economics of anaerobic digester operation on a Minnesota dairy farm. Rev Agr Econ 2007, 29:349-364.
11. Martin J.H. A comparison of dairy cattle manure management with and without anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization June 17, 2004, Eastern Research Group, Inc, Boston, MA, Available from:, [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.epa.gov/agstar/pdf/nydairy2003.pdf.
12. Nelson C, Lamb J, Final Report: Haubenschild Farms Anaerobic Digester, The Minnesota Project. August, 2002 Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.mnproject.org/pdf/Haubyrptupdated.pdf.
13. Nova Scotia Environment Compost Maturity Study. October 15, 2008. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.gov.ns.ca/nse/waste/docs/Compost.Maturity.Study.Report.pdf.
14. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and rural affairs, energy yields from a farm-based anaerobic digestion system. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/enyields.htm.
15. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and rural affairs, NMAN Software. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/nm/nman/default.htm.
16. Ontario Power Authority, Feed-In Tariff program, program overview version 1.1. September 30, 2009. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/Storage/97/10759_FIT-Program-Overview_v1.1.pdf.
17. 2S removal by activated carbon in small pig farm. Appl Energy 2009, 86:669-674.
18. Porpatham E., Ramesh A., Nagalingam B. Investigation on the effect of concentration of methane in biogas when used as a fuel for a spark ignition engine. Fuel 2008, 87:1651-1659.
19. Schievano A., Scaglia B., D'Imporzano G., Malagutti L., Gozzi A., Adani F. Predictions of biogas potentials using quick laboratory analyses; upgrading previous models for application to heterogeneous organic matrices. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100:5777-5782.
20. Statistics Canada, selected historical data from the Census of Agriculture, table 3.2 farms by industry (North American Industry Classification System), Canada and provinces, census years 2001 and 2006. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-632-x/2007000/t/4129754-eng.htm.
21. Statistics Canada, selected historical data from the census of agriculture, table 4.3 total cattle and calves: farms reporting, number of animals, and percentage distributions by size class, Canada and provinces, census years 1976 to 2006. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-632-x/2007000/t/4185583-eng.htm.
22. Peters M.S, Timmerhaus K.D, West R.E, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, fifth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.
23. Tippayawong N., Promwungkwa A., Rerkkriangkrai P. Long-term operation of small biogas/diesel dual-fuel engine for on-farm electricity generation. Biosystems Eng 2007, 98:26-32.
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-the AgSTAR program, guide to anaerobic digesters. October 2009. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.epa.gov/agstar/operational.html.
25. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones David L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:7928-7940.
26. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:849-860.
27. Wood SM, Layzell DB, A Canadian biomass inventory: feedstocks for a bio-based economy. Biocap Canada. June 27, 2003. Available from: [accessed 24.02.10]. http://www.biocap.ca/images/pdfs/BIOCAP_Biomass_Inventory.pdf.
28. 2S adsorption by alkaline activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 2002, 36:4460-4466.
29. Yiridoe E.K., Gordon R., Brown B.B. Nonmarket co-benefits and economic feasibility of on-farm biogas energy production. Energ Policy 2009, 37:1170-1179.