Does root competition asymmetry increase with water availability?

Plant Ecology and Diversity

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 255-264

  Rewald, Boris ^a   Leuschner, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Asymmetric competition; Fine roots; Mature forest; Root growth chamber; Root morphology; Soil moisture

Indexed keywords

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS PETRAEA;

EID: 77958175878     PISSN: 17550874     EISSN: 17551668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17550870903022865     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Aerts R, Chapin III FS. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30:1-67.
2. Aikio S. 2004. Competitive asymmetry, foraging area size and coexistence of annuals. Oikos 104:51-58.
3. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Jordan ET, Vierstra RD. 1994. Signalling among neighboring plants and the development of size inequalities in plant-populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 91:10094-10098.
4. Bartelheimer M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W. 2006. Aggregative root placement: a feature during interspecific competition in inland sand-dune. Plant and Soil 280:101-104.
5. Blair B. 2001. Effect of soil nutrient heterogeneity on the symmetry of belowground competition. Plant Ecology 156:199-203.
6. Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13:115-155.
7. Burk D. 2006. Physiologische, anatomische und chemische Aspekte der Regulation der Wurzelwasseraufnahme bei Rotbuche, Kiefer und Birke auf zwei unterschiedlich wasserversorgten Standorten. [Physiological, anatomical and chemical factors controlling water uptake by beech, pine and birch roots in two forests differing in water supply]. Göttingen (Germany): University of Göttingen.
8. Burke MK, Chambers J. 2003. Root dynamics in bottomland hardwood forests of the Southeastern United States Coastal Plain. Plant and Soil 250:141-153.
9. Cahill JF, Casper BB. 2000. Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos 90:311-320.
10. Casper BB, Cahill JF, Jackson RB. 2000. Plant competition in spatial heterogeneous environments. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA, editors. Ecological consequences of habitat heterogeneity. Oxford (UK): Blackwell. p. 111-130.
11. Chiatante D, Di Iorio A, Scippa GS. 2005. Root responses of Quercus ilex L. seedlings to drought and fire. Plant Biosystems 139:198-208.
12. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs 70:171-207.
13. Craine JM, Fargione J, Sugita S. 2005. Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytologist 166:933-940.
14. De Lillis M, Manes F, Tufaro F. 2005. Root plasticity in Mediterranean herbaceous species. Plant Biosystems 139:214-221.
15. Devine WD, Harrington TB. 2008. Belowground competition influences growth of natural regeneration in thinned Douglas fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38:3085-3097.
16. Donald CM. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9:421-435.
17. DWD. 2006. Monatliche Witterungsberichte 2005-2006. Witterungsreport "Express" des Deutschen Wetterdienstes. [Monthly weather reports 2005-2006]. Offenbach (Germany): Deutscher Wetterdienst.
18. Eissenstat DM, Caldwell MM. 1988. Competitive ability is linked to rates of water extraction - a field-study of 2 aridland tussock grasses. Oecologia 75:1-7.
19. Elberse WTH, de Kruyf HN. 1979. Competition between Hordeum vulgaris L. and Chenopodium album L. with different dates of emergence of Chenopodium album L. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 27:13-26.
20. Facelli E, Facelli JM. 2002. Soil phosphorus heterogeneity and mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate plant intra-specific competition and size distribution. Oecologia 133:54-61.
21. Falik O, Reides P, Gersani M, Novoplansky A. 2003. Self/non-self discrimination in roots. Journal of Ecology 91:525-531.
22. Falik O, Reides P, Gersani M, Novoplansky A. 2005. Root navigation by self inhibition. Plant Cell and Environment 28:562-569.
23. Fargione J, Tilman D. 2006. Plant species traits and capacity for resource reduction predict yield and abundance under competition in nitrogen-limited grassland. Functional Ecology 20:533-540.
24. Fitter AH, Stickland TR. 1991. Architectural analysis of plant-root systems. 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant-species. New Phytologist 118:383-389.
25. Ford ED, Diggle PJ. 1981. Competition for light in a plant mono-culture modelled as a spatial stochastic-process. Annals of Botany 48:481-500.
26. Fowler NL. 1984. The role of germination date, spatial arrangement, and neighborhood effects in competitive interactions in Linum. Journal of Ecology 72:307-318.
27. Fransen B, de Kroon H, Berendse F. 2001. Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters competition between two perennial grass species. Ecology 82:2534-2546.
28. Gebauer G, Stadler J. 1990. Nitrate assimilation and nitrate content in different organs of ash trees (Fraxinus excelsior). In: van Beusichem ML, editor. Plant nutrition - physiology and applications. Dortrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer. p.101-106.
29. Geber MA. 1989. Interplay of morphology and development on size inequality: a Polygonum greenhouse study. Ecological Monographs 59:267-288.
30. Goldberg DE, Rajaniemi TK, Gurevitch J, Stewart-Oaten A. 1999. Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: Competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80:1118-1131.
31. Goldberg DE, Scheiner SM. 1993. ANOVA and ANCOVA: field competition experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. London (UK): Chapman & Hall. p. 77-98.
32. Grace JB. 1995. On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology 76:305-308.
33. Grime JP, Campbell BD, Mackey JML, Crick JC. 1991. Root plasticity, nitrogen capture and competitive ability. In: Atkinson D, editor. Plant root growth. An ecological perspective. London (UK): Blackwell. p. 381-397.
34. Gruntman M, Novoplansky A. 2004. Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101:3863-3867.
35. Hara T. 1993. Effects of variation in individual growth on plant-species coexistence. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:409-416.
36. Herben T, Biezina S, Skalova H, Hadincova V, Krahulec F. 2007. Variation in plant performance in a grassland: species-specific and neighbouring root mass effects. Journal of Vegetation Science 18:55-62.
37. Hertel D. 1999. Das Feinwurzelsystem von Rein- und Mischbeständen der Rotbuche: Struktur, Dynamik und inters-pezifische Konkurrenz. [The fine root system of mixed stands of European beech: structure, dynamics and interspecific competition]. Berlin (Germany): Cramer.
38. Hertel D, Leuschner C. 2006. The in situ root growth chamber: a novel tool for the experimental analysis of root competition in forest soils. Pedobiologia 50:217-224.
39. Hodge A. 2006. Plastic plants and patchy soils. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:401-411.
40. Huston M. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist 113:81-101.
41. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis - 4AR. Geneva (Switzerland): Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
42. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM. 1991. Kinetic responses of Pseudoroegneria roots to localized soil enrichment. Plant and Soil 138:231-238.
43. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM. 1993. The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74:612-614.
44. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM. 1996. Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: Modelling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environment. Journal of Ecology 84:891-903.
45. Kajimoto T, Osawa A, Matsuura Y, Abaimov AP, Zyryanova OA, Kondo K, Tokuchi N, Hirobe M. 2007. Individual-based measurement and analysis of root system development: case studies for Larix gmelinii trees growing on the permafrost region in Siberia. Journal of Forest Research 12:103-112.
46. Keddy PA. 1989. Competition. London (UK): Chapman & Hall.
47. Korn S. 2004. Experimentelle Untersuchung der Wasseraufnahme und der hydraulischen Eigenschaften des Wurzelsystems von sechs heimischen Baumarten. [Experimental investigation of water uptake and hydraulic properties of the root system of six European tree species]. Göttingen (Germany): University of Göttingen.
48. Korstian CF, Coile TS. 1938. Plant competition in forest stands. Durham (NC): Duke University.
49. Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG. 1991. The physiological ecology of woody plants. San Diego (CA): Academic.
50. Leuschner C, Coners H, Icke R. 2004. In situ measurement of water absorption by fine roots of three temperate trees: species differences and differential activity of superficial and deep roots. Tree Physiology 24:1359-1367.
51. Lõhmus K, Oja T, Lasn R. 1989. Specific root area - a soil characteristic. Plant and Soil 119:245-249.
52. Moore B. 1929. Root competition versus light under forests. Ecology 10:268.
53. Moreno G, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Dupraz C. 2005. Fine root distribution in Dehesas of Central-Western Spain. Plant and Soil 277:153-162.
54. Nambiar EKS, Sands R. 1993. Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1955-1968.
55. Newbery DM, Newman EI. 1978. Competition between grassland plants of different initial sizes. Oecologia 33:361-380.
56. Newman EI. 1973. Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 244:310.
57. Nord-Larsen T, Damaard C, Weiner J. 2006. Quantifying size-asymmetric growth among individual beech trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:418-425.
58. Nye PH, Tinker PB. 1977. Solute movement in the soil-root system. Berkeley (CA): Blackwell.
59. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD. 1999. Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105-1117.
60. Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, et al. 2007. Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosystems 141:426-442.
61. Peltzer DA, Wilson SD, Gerry AK. 1998. Competition intensity along a productivity gradient in a low-diversity grassland. American Naturalist 151:465-476.
62. Powell GW, Bork EW. 2006. Aspen canopy removal and root trenching effects on understory vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management 230:79-90.
63. Poyatos R, Martínez-Vilalta J, Čermák J, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Köstner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N, et al. 2007. Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Eurasia. Oecologia 153:245-259.
64. Rajaniemi TK. 2003. Evidence for size asymmetry of belowground competition. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:239-247.
65. Rajaniemi TK. 2007. Root foraging traits and competitive ability in heterogeneous soils. Oecologia 153:145-152.
66. Raynaud X, Leadley PW. 2004. Soil characteristics play a key role in modelling nutrient competition in plant communities. Ecology 85:2200-2214.
67. Raynaud X, Leadley PW. 2005. Symmetry of belowground competition in a spatially explicit model of nutrient competition. Ecological Modelling 189:447-453.
68. Rewald B. 2008. Impact of climate change-induced drought on tree root hydraulic properties and competition belowground [PhD thesis]. [Göttingen (Germany)]: University of Göttingen.
69. Rewald B, Leuschner C. 2009. Belowground competition in a broad-leaved temperate mixed forest: pattern analysis and experiments in a four-species stand. European Journal of Forest Research, online first.
70. Riegel GM, Miller RF, Krueger WC. 1995. The effects of above-ground and belowground competition on understory species composition in a Pinus ponderosa forest. Forest Science 41:864-889.
71. Robinson D, Hodge A, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH. 1999. Plant root proliferation in nitrogen-rich patches confers competitive advantage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:431-435.
72. Robinson D, Linehan DJ, Gordon DC. 1994. Capture of nitrate from soil by wheat in relation to root length, nitrogen inflow and availability. New Phytologist 128:297-305.
73. Ross MA, Harper JL. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology 60:77-88.
74. Schenk HJ. 2006. Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology 94:725-739.
75. Schoener TW. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist 122:240-285.
76. Schwinning S. 1996. Decomposition analysis of competitive symmetry and size structure dynamics. Annals of Botany 77:47-57.
77. Schwinning S, Fox GA. 1995. Population-dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants. Oikos 72:422-432.
78. Schwinning S, Weiner J. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447-455.
79. Seabloom EW, Harpole WS, Reichman OJ, Tilman D. 2003. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100:13384-13389.
80. Skovsgaard JP. 1997. Management of Sitka spruce without thinnings. Hørsholm (Denmark): Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute.
81. Stoll P, Prati D. 2001. Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82:319-327.
82. Taylor JH, Peterson CA. 2005. Ectomycorrhizal impacts on nutrient uptake pathways in woody roots. New Forests 30:203-214.
83. Thomas SC, Weiner J. 1989. Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populations. Oecologia 80:349-355.
84. Tilman D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton (NJ): University Press.
85. Twolan-Strutt L, Keddy PA. 1996. Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland plant communities. Ecology 77:259-270.
86. Umeki K. 1997. Effect of crown asymmetry on size-structure dynamics of plant populations. Annals of Botany 79:631-641.
87. van Baalen J, Kuiters AT, van der Woude CSC. 1984. Interference of Scrophularia nodosa and Digitalis purpurea in mixed seedling cultures, as affected by the specific emergence date. Acta Oecologica 5:279-290.
88. Van Lear DH, Kapeluck PR. 1995. Above- and below-stump biomass and nutrient content of a mature Loblolly pine plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25:361-367.
89. von Wettberg EJ, Weiner J. 2003. Larger Triticum aestivum plants do not preempt nutrient-rich patches in a glasshouse experiment. Plant Ecology 169:85-92.
90. Wang Q, Cheng Y. 2004. [Response of fine roots to soil nutrient spatial heterogeneity] Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 15:1063-1068.
91. Weiner J. 1986. How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425-1427.
92. Weiner J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:360-364.
93. Weiner J, Wright DB, Castro S. 1997. Symmetry of below-ground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals. Oikos 79:85-91.
94. Welden CW, Slauson WL, Ward RT. 1988. Competition and abi- otic stress among trees and shrubs in Northwest Colorado. Ecology 69:1566-1577.
95. Weltzin JF, Loik ME, Schwinning S, Williams DG, Fay PA, Haddad BM, Harte J, Huxman TE, Knapp AK, Lin GH, et al. 2003. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 53:941-952.
96. Wichmann L. 2001. Annual variations in competition symmetry in even-aged Sitka spruce. Annals of Botany 88:145-151.
97. Williams M, Yanai RD. 1996. Multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis and ecological implications of a nutrient uptake model. Plant and Soil 180:311-324.
98. Wilson SD, Tilman D. 1993. Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599-611.
99. Zegada-Lizarazu W, Izumi Y, Iijima M. 2006. Water competition of intercropped Pearl millet with cowpea under drought and soil compaction stresses. Plant Production Science 9:123-132.