Impacts of uncertainty in data processing on estimation of CO 2 flux components

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2389-2396

  Liu, Min ^a   He, Hong Lin ^a   Yu, Gui Rui ^a   Sun, Xiao Min ^a   Zhu, Xu Dong ^a,b   Zhang, Li ^a   Zhao, Xin Quan ^c   Wang, Hui Min ^a   Shi, Pei Li ^a   Han, Shi Jie ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHIC SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c NORTHWEST INSTITUTE OF PLATEAU BIOLOGY   (China)

^d INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ECOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

CO 2 flux; Data processing; Eddy covariance technique; Uncertainty; Variance analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON FLUX; DATA PROCESSING; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EDDY COVARIANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GRASSLAND; HERB; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THRESHOLD; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS; VELOCITY;

ARTICLE; CHINA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; POACEAE; SOIL; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREE; UNCERTAINTY;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; POACEAE; SOIL; TREES; UNCERTAINTY;

CHINA;

EID: 77958172342     PISSN: 10019332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baldocchi DD. Assessing the deey corvariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: Past, present and future. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9: 479-492
2. Yu G-R, Sun X-M. Theory and Methodology for Flux Measurement in Terrestrial Ecosystem. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006 (in Chinese )
3. Wang J-M, Wang W-Z, Ao Y-H, et al. Turbulence flux measurements under complicated conditions. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 22(8): 791-797 (in Chinese)
4. Moffat AM, Papale D, Reichstein M, et al. Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 147: 209-232
5. Hagen SC, Braswell BH, Linder E, et al. Statistical uncertainty of eddy flux-based estimates of gross ecosystem carbon exchange at Howland Forest, Maine. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2006, 111: D08S03, doi:10.1029/2005JD006154
6. Richardson AD, Hollinger DY, Burba GG, et al. A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 136: 1-18
7. 2 flux components in subtropical evergreen coniferous plantation. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2009, 52: 257-268
8. Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, et al. Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001 , 107: 43-69
9. Papale D, Reichstein M, Aubinet M, et. al. Towards a standardized processing of net ecosystem exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: Algorithms and uncertainty estimation. Biogeosciences, 2006, 3: 571-583 (Pubitemid 44832307)
10. 2 flux data processing system at China FLUX. Geo-informatics Science, 2008, 10(5): 557-565 (in Chinese )
11. 2 eddy covariance flux data in ChinaFLUX. Science in China Series D), 2004, 34(suppl.II) : 37-45 (in Chinese)
12. Hollinger DY, Kelliher FM, Byers JN, et al. Carbon-dioxide exchange between an undisturbed old-growth temperate forest and the atmosphere. Ecology, 1994, 75: 134-150
13. 2 storage flux on carbon budget of forest ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(5): 1201-1209 (in Chinese )
14. 2 flux above a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest. Science in China Series D), 2006, 36 (suppl. I): 60-69 (in Chinese)
15. 2 fluxes from subtropical plantation coniferous ecosystem. Science in Chirm Series D, 2006, 36(suppl. I): 91-102 (in Chinese)
16. 2 exchange and controlling factors in a steppe -Kobresia meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Science in China Series D), 2006, 36(suppl. I): 194-203 (in Chinese)
17. Williams M, Richardson AD, Reichstein M, et al. Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data. Biogeosciences, 2009, 6: 1341-1359
18. Gu LH, Falge EM, Boden T, et al. Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 128: 179-197
19. Reichstein M, Falge E, Baldocchi D, et. al. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: Review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11: 1424-1439
20. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993
21. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 1994, 263: 185-190
22. Zhang X-Q, Xu D-Y. Physiological Model of Forest Growth and Yield. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2002 (in Chinese)
23. Lloyd J, Taylor JA. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 1994, 8: 315-323
24. 2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001 , 33: 155-165
25. Davidson EA, Verchot LV, Cattanio JH, et al. Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48: 53-69