Imaging of Uterine Malignancies

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 377-387

  Sohaib, Syed A ^a   Verma, Hema ^a   Attygalle, Ayoma D ^a   Ind, Thomas E J ^a  

^a ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE;

ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIUM SARCOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MIXED MULLERIAN TUMOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIMARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT PLANNING; ULTRASOUND; UTERUS CANCER; UTERUS LEIOMYOSARCOMA; UTERUS LYMPHOMA; UTERUS METASTASIS; UTERUS SARCOMA; UTERUS TUMOR;

ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; LYMPHOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SARCOMA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 77958172307     PISSN: 08872171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009, 105:103-104.
2. Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009, 104:177-178.
3. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225-249.
4. Amant F., Moerman P., Neven P., et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2005, 366:491-505.
5. Goodman A., Zukerberg L.R., Rice L.W., et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium: A report of eight cases and a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 1996, 61:54-60.
6. Creutzberg C.L., van Putten W.L., Koper P.C., et al. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage 1 endometrial carcinoma: Multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma. Lancet 2000, 355:1404-1411.
7. Grasel R.P., Outwater E.K., Siegelman E.S., et al. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 2000, 214:47-52.
8. Barwick T.D., Rockall A.G., Barton D.P., et al. Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol 2006, 61:545-555.
9. Smith-Bindman R., Kerlikowske K., Feldstein V.A., et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA 1998, 280:1510-1517.
10. Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009, 105:109.
11. DelMaschio A., Vanzulli A., Sironi S., et al. Estimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: Efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993, 160:533-538.
12. Prompeler H.J., Madjar H., du Bois A., et al. Transvaginal sonography of myometrial invasion depth in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994, 73:343-346.
13. Fishman A., Altaras M., Bernheim J., et al. The value of transvaginal sonography in the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in high and low grade endometrial cancer and in comparison to frozen section in grade 1 disease. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000, 21:128-130.
14. Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K.K., et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis. Radiology 1999, 212:711-718.
15. Hardesty L.A., Sumkin J.H., Hakim C., et al. The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001, 176:603-606.
16. Tsili A.C., Tsampoulas C., Dalkalitsis N., et al. Local staging of endometrial carcinoma: Role of multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1043-1048.
17. Park J.Y., Kim E.N., Kim D.Y., et al. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008, 108:486-492.
18. Kitajima K., Murakami K., Yamasaki E., et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:1652-1658.
19. Kinkel K., Forstner R., Danza F.M., et al. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:1565-1574.
20. Lin G., Ng K.K., Chang C.J., et al. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted. 3.0 T MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2009, 250:784-792.
21. Rechichi G., Galimberti S., Signorelli M., et al. Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5-T. Eur Radiol 2009, 20:754-762.
22. Kinkel K. Pitfalls in staging uterine neoplasm with imaging: A review. Abdom Imaging 2006, 31:164-173.
23. Rockall A.G., Meroni R., Sohaib S.A., et al. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007, 17:188-196.
24. Manfredi R., Mirk P., Maresca G., et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: Role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 2004, 231:372-378.
25. Toki T., Oka K., Nakayama K., et al. A comparative study of pre-operative procedures to assess cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 105:512-516.
26. Rockall A.G., Sohaib S.A., Harisinghani M.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:2813-2821.
27. Sohaib S.A., Houghton S.L., Meroni R., et al. Recurrent endometrial cancer: Patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis. Clin Radiol 2007, 62:28-34. discussion: 35-26.
28. Belhocine T., De Barsy C., Hustinx R., et al. Usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002, 29:1132-1139.
29. Kitajima K., Murakami K., Yamasaki E., et al. Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: Comparison with PET and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009, 36:362-372.
30. D'Angelo E., Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: A review. Gynecol Oncol 2010, 116:131-139.
31. McCluggage W.G. Malignant biphasic uterine tumours: Carcinosarcomas or metaplastic carcinomas?. J Clin Pathol 2002, 55:321-325.
32. Ferguson S.E., Tornos C., Hummer A., et al. Prognostic features of surgical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007, 31:1653-1661.
33. Silverberg S.G., Major F.J., Blessing J.A., et al. Carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mesodermal tumor) of the uterus. A Gynecologic Oncology Group pathologic study of 203 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990, 9:1-19.
34. Sahdev A., Sohaib S.A., Jacobs I., et al. MR imaging of uterine sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:1307-1311.
35. Ohguri T., Aoki T., Watanabe H., et al. MRI findings including gadolinium-enhanced dynamic studies of malignant, mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: Differentiation from endometrial carcinomas. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:2737-2742.
36. Whitten C.R., DeSouza N.M. Magnetic resonance imaging of uterine malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 17:365-377.
37. Kido A., Togashi K., Koyama T., et al. Diffusely enlarged uterus: Evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003, 23:1423-1439.
38. Szabo I., Szantho A., Csabay L., et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography in the differentiation of uterine sarcomas from uterine leiomyomas. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002, 23:29-34.
39. Umesaki N., Tanaka T., Miyama M., et al. Positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose of uterine sarcoma: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and power Doppler imaging. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 80:372-377.
40. Shida M., Murakami M., Tsukada H., et al. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in leiomyomatous uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007, 17:285-290.
41. Amant F., Coosemans A., Debiec-Rychter M., et al. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 2009, 10:1188-1198.
42. Kim J.A., Lee M.S., Choi J.S. Sonographic findings of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma. Korean J Radiol 2006, 7:281-286.
43. Cacciatore B., Lehtovirta P., Wahlstrom T., et al. Ultrasound findings in uterine mixed Müllerian sarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 1989, 35:290-293.
44. Koyama T., Togashi K., Konishi I., et al. MR imaging of endometrial stromal sarcoma: Correlation with pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999, 173:767-772.
45. Ueda M., Otsuka M., Hatakenaka M., et al. MR imaging findings of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: Differentiation from endometrial carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2001, 11:28-33.
46. Kosari F., Daneshbod Y., Parwaresch R., et al. Lymphomas of the female genital tract: A study of 186 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:1512-1520.
47. Harris N.L., Scully R.E. Malignant lymphoma and granulocytic sarcoma of the uterus and vagina. A clinicopathologic analysis of 27 cases. Cancer 1984, 53:2530-2545.
48. Kawakami S., Togashi K., Kojima N., et al. MR appearance of malignant lymphoma of the uterus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995, 19:238-242.
49. Kimura I., Togashi K., Tsutsui K., et al. MR imaging of gynecologic lymphoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991, 15:500-501.
50. Kim Y.S., Koh B.H., Cho O.K., et al. MR imaging of primary uterine lymphoma. Abdom Imaging 1997, 22:441-444.
51. Goto N., Oishi-Tanaka Y., Tsunoda H., et al. Magnetic resonance findings of primary uterine malignant lymphoma. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007, 6:7-13.
52. Suzuki Y., Tamaki Y., Hasegawa M., et al. Magnetic resonance images of primary malignant lymphoma of the uterine body: A case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2000, 30:519-521.
53. Cheong I.J., Kim S.H., Park C.M. Primary uterine lymphoma: A case report. Korean J Radiol 2000, 1:223-225.
54. Metser U., Haider M.A., Khalili K., et al. MR imaging findings and patterns of spread in secondary tumor involvement of the uterine body and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180:765-769.
55. Kim S.H., Hwang H.Y., Choi B.I. Uterine metastasis from stomach cancer: Radiological findings. Clin Radiol 1990, 42:285-286.