What effects? Measuring functional outcomes in comparative effectiveness research

PM and R

Volumn 2, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 881-883

  Sandel, M Elizabeth ^a  

^a KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DISABLED PERSONS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PALLIATIVE CARE; PHYSICAL MEDICINE;

EID: 77958165856     PISSN: 19341482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability, and Health 2002, World Health Organization, Geneva, Accessed December 20, 2009. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
2. American Medical Association. Resolution 101 Function as a critical outcome to be included in health care reform legislation, Accessed December 20, 2009. http://www.aapmr.org/hpl/legislation/AMA_mtg.htm.
3. The Future of Disability in America 2007, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. M. Fields, A. Jette (Eds.).
4. The current state of health care for people with disabilities September 30, 2009, 302-303. National Council on Disability, Washington, DC, Accessed December 20, 2009. http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2009/pdf/HealthCare.pdf.
5. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research 2009, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC.
6. Jette A.M., Haley S.M. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37:339-345.