Making communities safer from crime: An undervalued element in impact assessment

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-35

  Glasson, John ^a,b   Cozens, Paul ^b  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crime; Designing out crime; Environmental criminology; Fear of crime; Impact assessment; Improving practice; Safety

Indexed keywords

DESIGNING OUT CRIME; ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY; FEAR OF CRIME; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; IMPROVING PRACTICE; SAFETY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

CRIME;

CRIME; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LAND USE; SAFETY; SOCIAL IMPACT; SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

AUSTRALIA; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77958156089     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adeane M. Personal communication via email 17 February. Drawings produced by Design Design, Perth, Western Australia 2007, Email: Michael@designdesign.com.au.
2. Armitage R., Gamman L. Sustainability via Security: A New Look. Built Environment 2009, 35(3):297-301.
3. Bottoms A.E., Wiles P. Environmental criminology. The Oxford handbook of criminology 1997, Clarendon Press, Oxford. M. Maguire, R. Moran, R. Reiner (Eds.).
4. Bramley G., Power S., Dempsey N. What is "Social Sustainability", and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it?. UK Planning Research Conference, UCL 2006, April.
5. Brand S., Price R. The economic and social costs of crime. Home Office research study number 217 2000, Home Office, London.
6. Brantingham P., Brantingham P. Environmental criminology 1981, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
7. Brantingham P., Brantingham P. Patterns in Crime 1984, Macmillan, New York.
8. Brantingham P.J., Brantingham P.L. Nodes, paths and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J Environ Psychol 1993, 13:3-28.
9. Brantingham P., Brantingham P. Environmental criminology: from theory to urban planning practice. Stud Crime Crime Prev 1998, 7(1):31-60.
10. Brantingham P., Brantingham P., Molumby T. Perceptions of crime in a dreadful enclosure. Ohio J Sci 1977, 77(6):256-261.
11. CAG Consultants Sustainability in development control: a research report 1997, Local Government Association, London.
12. Canter L., Clark R. NEPA effectiveness-a survey of academics. Environ Impact Assess Rev 1997, 71:313-328.
13. Carmona M., Heath T., Oc T., Tiesdell S. Public places urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design 2003, Architectural Press, Oxford.
14. CEGB Social policy statement for Sizewell 1987, CEGB, London.
15. Chadwick A. Socio-economic impacts: are they still the poor relations in UK environmental statements?. J Environ Plann Manag 2002, 45(1):3-24.
16. Clements J. Revealed: the carbon footprint of a murder Website visited 2nd October, 2009. http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/anything-you-say/2009/02/revealed-the-carbon-footprint.html.
17. Cohen L., Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 1979, 44:588-608.
18. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) On the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. Official J 1985, L175. June 1985.
19. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment 2001, CEC, Brussels.
20. Cozens P. Sustainable urban development and crime prevention through environmental design for the British city; towards an effective urban environmentalism for the 21st century. Cities Int J Urban Policy Plann 2002, 19(2):129-137.
21. Cozens P. Planning, crime and urban sustainability. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment 2007, vol. 1:187-196. WIT Press, Southampton. A. Kungolas, C. Brebbia, E. Beriatos (Eds.).
22. Cozens P. Public health and the potential benefits of crime prevention through environmental design. NSW Publ Health Bull 2007, 18(11-12):232-237. Online: http://www.publish.csiro.au/nid/226/issue/4094.htm.
23. Cozens P. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in Western Australia: planning for sustainable urban futures. Int J Sustainable Develop Plann 2008, 3(3):272-292.
24. Cozens P.M. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED); origins, concepts, current status and future directions. Environmental criminology and crime analysis 2008, Willan Publishing, Devon, UK. R. Wortley, L. Mazerolle, S. Rombouts (Eds.).
25. Crowe T. Prevention through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts, 2nd edition 2000, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
26. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) Index of multiple deprivation 2007, HM Government, London.
27. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Securing the future: the UK sustainable development strategy 2005, HM Government, London.
28. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) A better quality of life: a strategy for sustainable development in the UK 1999, DETR, London.
29. Department of the Premier and Cabinet (DPC) Hope for the future: the Western Australian state sustainability strategy 2003, Government of Western Australia, Perth.
30. DETR Monitoring progress - indicators for the strategy for sustainable development in the United Kingdom London. http://environment.detr.gov.uk/sustainable/quality/monitor/index.htm.
31. Dewberry E. Designing out crime: insights from eco-design. Secur J 2003, 16:51-62.
32. DoE (Department of the Environment) Environmental Assessment: a guide to the procedures 1989, HMSO, London.
33. DoEN (Department of Energy) Sizewell B Public Inquiry: Report by Sir Frank Layfield 1986, HMSO, London.
34. Du Plessis C. The links between crime prevention and sustainable development. Open House Int 1999, 24(1):33-40.
35. Eck J. Preventing crime at places. Evidence-based crime prevention 2002, Routledge, a24194, London. L. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, D. Mackenzie (Eds.).
36. Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) Review of the EIA Process in Western Australia 2009, EPA, Perth.
37. European Council Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000: Presidency Conclusions 2000, Council of the EU, Brussels.
38. Faber N., Jorna R., van Engelen J. A study into the conceptual foundations of the notion of sustainability. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 2005, 7(1).
39. Fattah E.A. Understanding criminal victimization: an introduction to theoretical victimology 1991, Prentice-Hall, Scarborough, Ontario.
40. Felson M. Routine activities and crime prevention in the developing metropolis. Criminology 1987, 25:911-931.
41. Glasson J. Better monitoring for better impact management: the local socio-economic effects of constructing Sizewell B nuclear power station. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 2005, 23(3). pp.
42. Glasson J. Development of a statewide sustainability checklist for the Western Australian planning system: keeping it simply sustainable. J Built Environ Res 2008, 1(1):35-103.
43. Glasson J. Socio-economic impacts. Methods in EIA: 3rd Edition 2009, Routledge, London, Chapter 2. P. Morris, R. Therivel (Eds.).
44. Glasson J., Chadwick A. The local socio-economic impacts of the Sizewell B PWR power station construction project, 1987-1995: summary report. Impacts assessment unit: Oxford Brookes University 1995, September.
45. Glasson J., Heaney D. Socio-economic impacts: the poor relations in British EISs. J Environ Plann Manag 1993, 36(3):335-343.
46. Glasson J., Wood G. Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 2009, 27(4):283-290.
47. Glasson J., Therivel R., Chadwick A. Introduction to environmental impact assessment: 2005, Routledge, London. 3rd Edition.
48. Goodchild B. Housing design, urban form and sustainable development. Town Plann Rev 1994, 65(2):143-158.
49. Herbert D. Crime delinquency and the urban environment. Prog Human Geogr 1977, 1:208-239.
50. IOCGP Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 2003, 21(3):231-250.
51. Jeffery C. Crime prevention through environmental design 1971, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
52. Johnson H. Crime victimisation in Australia: key results of the 2004 international crime victimisation survey. Research and Public Policy Series 2005, No. 64.
53. Kinney J.B., Brantingham P.L., Wuschke K., Kirk M.G., Brantingham P.J. Crime attractors, generators and detractors: land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environ 2008, 34(1):62-74.
54. Knights B., Pascoe T., Henchley A. Sustainability and crime: managing and recognising the drivers of crime and security 2002, Building Research Establishment, Garston, Watford.
55. Koppelaar P. The "Sociale Index" Rotterdam Statistics Office (see OISD: EIBURS website, paper presented at Feb 2009 conference) 2008.
56. Kraut D. Hanging out the no vacancy sign: eliminating the blight of vacant buildings from urban areas. New York University Law Review 1999, 74:412-432.
57. Lynch K. The Image of the City 1960, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
58. Maguire M. Burglary in a Dwelling 1982, Heinemann, London.
59. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality 1943, Harper, New York.
60. Mayhew P. Counting the costs of crime in Australia. Trends and Issues 2003, No. 247. AIC, Canberra.
61. Newman O. Defensible space people and design in the violent cities 1973, Architectural Press, London.
62. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) Sustainability appraisal of regional spatial strategies and local development document 2005, ODPM, London.
63. Perlgut D. Vandalism: the environmental crime. Australian Journal of Social Issues 1983, 18:20916.
64. Roman J., Farrell G. Cost-benefit analysis for crime prevention: opportunity costs, routine savings, and crime externalities. Crime prevention studies 2002, 14:53-92. N. Tilley (Ed.).
65. Ross C., Mirowsky J. Disorder and decay: the concept and measurement of perceived neighbourhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review 1999, 34(3):412-432.
66. Ross C., Jang S. Neighbourhood Disorder, Fear and Mistrust: The Buffering Role of Social Ties with Neighbours. American Journal of Community Psychology 2000, 28(4):401-420.
67. Schneider R., Kitchen T. Planning for Crime prevention: A Transatlantic Perspective 2001, Routledge, London and New York.
68. Scott J. A Matter of record 1990, Polity Press and Basil Blackwell Inc.
69. South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA) A better quality of life in the South East-the regional sustainable development framework 2001, SEERA, Guildford.
70. South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA) South East England integrated regional framework 2004, SEERA, Guildford.
71. UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Policies and systems of environmental impact assessment 1991, UNECE, Geneva.
72. Vanclay F. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2002, 22(3):183-211.
73. Vanclay F. The triple bottom line and impact assessment: how do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other?. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 2004, 6(3):265-288.
74. Vrij A., Winkel W. Characteristics of the built environment and fear of crime: a research note on interventions in unsafe locations. Deviant Behav 1991, 12:203-215.
75. Wilson J., Kelling G. The Police and Neighbourhood Safety. Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly 1982, 3:29-38.
76. Wood C. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review-2nd edition 2003, Prentice-Hall, Harlow.