Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound

Cornea

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1091-1095

  Jahadi Hosseini, Hamid Reza ^a   Katbab, Asadollah ^a   Khalili, Mohammad Reza ^a   Abtahi, Mohammad Bagher ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Central corneal thickness; Galilei; Pentacam; thinnest pachymetry; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CAMERA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MYOPIA; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHEIMPFLUG CAMERA;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958152090     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cf98e5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, et al. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1272-1277. (Pubitemid 38748442)
2. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767-772.
3. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, et al. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1137-1141. (Pubitemid 27387949)
4. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44:367-408.
5. Kawana K, Tokunaga T, Miyata K, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:466-468. (Pubitemid 38437860)
6. Marsich MW, Bullimore MA. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea. 2000;19:792-795.
7. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:174-177. (Pubitemid 38142079)
8. Christensen A, Narváez J, Zimmerman G. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and orbscan pachymetry. Cornea. 2008;27:862-865.
9. Modis L Jr, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Scanning-slit and specular microscopic pachymetry in comparison with ultrasonic determination of corneal thickness. Cornea. 2001;20:711-714. (Pubitemid 34506468)
10. Li EY, Mohamed S, Leung CK, et al. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1842-1847. (Pubitemid 47483909)
11. Cheng AC, Tang E, Mohamed S, et al. Correction factor in Orbscan II in the assessment of corneal pachymetry. Cornea. 2006;25:1158-1161. (Pubitemid 46005852)
12. Thomas J, Wang J, Rollins AM, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, ultrasonic pachymetry, and a scanning slit method. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:671-678. (Pubitemid 44379997)
13. O'Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C. Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the Oculus Pentacam. Cornea. 2005;24:920-924. (Pubitemid 41688522)
14. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:892-899. (Pubitemid 41566871)
15. Rosa N, LanzaM, Borrelli M, et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with Orbscan and Pentacam. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:895-899. (Pubitemid 350175114)
16. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, et al. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28:333-338.
17. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1729-1735. (Pubitemid 41503429)
18. Kim SW, Byun YJ, Kim EK, et al. Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:888-894. (Pubitemid 350175113)
19. Ucxakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:970-977. (Pubitemid 44202394)
20. Fujioka M, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, et al. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness. Curr Eye Res. 2007; 32:89-94. (Pubitemid 46328423)
21. Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33: 1701-1707. (Pubitemid 47432834)
22. Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, et al. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:7-12. (Pubitemid 43016167)
23. Menassa N, Kaufmann C, Goggin M, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1742-1747.
24. Bechmann M, Thiel MJ, Neubauer AS, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with a retinal optical coherence tomography device versus standard ultrasonic pachymetry. Cornea. 2001;20:50-54. (Pubitemid 32038155)
25. Brugin E, Ghirlando A, Gambato C, et al. Central corneal thickness: zring corneal confocal microscopy versus ultrasound pachymetry. Cornea. 2007;26:303-307. (Pubitemid 46568830)
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160. (Pubitemid 29425900)
28. de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B, et al. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:712-718. (Pubitemid 47126588)
29. Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:75-80.
30. Tam ES, Rootman DS. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1179-1184.
31. Nissen J, Hjortdal JO, Ehlers N, et al. A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69:659-663.