-
1
-
-
79954551980
-
Fast breeder reactor programs: History and status
-
February
-
Thomas B. Cochran, Harold A. Feiveson, Walt Patterson, Gennadi Pshakin, M.V. Ramana, Mycle Schneider, Tatsujiro Suzuki, and Frank von Hippel, "Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status," International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) Research Report no. 8, February 2010. Available at http://www. ipfmlibrary.org/rr08.pdf.
-
(2010)
International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) Research Report No. 8
-
-
Cochran, T.B.1
Feiveson, H.A.2
Patterson, W.3
Pshakin, G.4
Ramana, M.V.5
Schneider, M.6
Suzuki, T.7
Von Hippel, F.8
-
2
-
-
77958152266
-
2009 world nuclear industry status report
-
November/December
-
These projections were discussed in Mycle Schneider, Steve Thomas, Antony Froggatt, and Doug Koplow, "2009 World Nuclear Industry Status Report," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November/December 2009, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1-19.
-
(2009)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
, vol.65
, Issue.6
, pp. 1-19
-
-
Schneider, M.1
Thomas, S.2
Froggatt, A.3
Koplow, D.4
-
3
-
-
1142269496
-
-
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press app. 5A
-
For a full technical analysis of how much the cost of uranium factors into the cost of electricity generated at a nuclear power plant, see Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Future of Nuclear Power, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), app. 5A.
-
(2003)
The Future of Nuclear Power, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study
-
-
-
4
-
-
79954471292
-
-
This would be a capital cost difference on the order of $1,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity compared to a conventional reactor. With a 10 percent capital charge and a 90 percent average capacity factor (where the reactor operated 90 percent of the time), it would translate to a cost difference of about 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour
-
This would be a capital cost difference on the order of $1,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity compared to a conventional reactor. With a 10 percent capital charge and a 90 percent average capacity factor (where the reactor operated 90 percent of the time), it would translate to a cost difference of about 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
20344396375
-
The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel
-
June
-
Matthew Bunn, Steve Fetter, John Holdren, and Bob van der Zwaan, "The Economics of Reprocessing Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel," Nuclear Technology , vol. 150 (June 2005), p. 209.
-
(2005)
Nuclear Technology
, vol.150
, pp. 209
-
-
Bunn, M.1
Fetter, S.2
Holdren, J.3
Van Der Zwaan, B.4
-
6
-
-
69549096499
-
Dry-cask storage: How germany led the way
-
September/October
-
Klaus Janberg & Frank von Hippel, "Dry-Cask Storage: How Germany Led the Way," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 2009, vol. 65, no. 5, p. 29.
-
(2009)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
, vol.65
, Issue.5
, pp. 29
-
-
Janberg, K.1
Von Hippel, F.2
-
7
-
-
79954487320
-
-
IPFM, The Path to Nuclear Disarmament
-
IPFM, Global Fissile Material Report 2009: The Path to Nuclear Disarmament. Available at www.fissilematerials.org/ipfm/site-down/gfmr09.pdf.
-
(2009)
Global Fissile Material Report
-
-
|