메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 50-56

It's time to give up on breeder reactors

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 77958151196     PISSN: 00963402     EISSN: 19383282     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2968/066003007     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (15)

References (7)
  • 2
    • 77958152266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2009 world nuclear industry status report
    • November/December
    • These projections were discussed in Mycle Schneider, Steve Thomas, Antony Froggatt, and Doug Koplow, "2009 World Nuclear Industry Status Report," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November/December 2009, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1-19.
    • (2009) Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , vol.65 , Issue.6 , pp. 1-19
    • Schneider, M.1    Thomas, S.2    Froggatt, A.3    Koplow, D.4
  • 3
    • 1142269496 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press app. 5A
    • For a full technical analysis of how much the cost of uranium factors into the cost of electricity generated at a nuclear power plant, see Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Future of Nuclear Power, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), app. 5A.
    • (2003) The Future of Nuclear Power, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study
  • 4
    • 79954471292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This would be a capital cost difference on the order of $1,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity compared to a conventional reactor. With a 10 percent capital charge and a 90 percent average capacity factor (where the reactor operated 90 percent of the time), it would translate to a cost difference of about 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour
    • This would be a capital cost difference on the order of $1,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity compared to a conventional reactor. With a 10 percent capital charge and a 90 percent average capacity factor (where the reactor operated 90 percent of the time), it would translate to a cost difference of about 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour.
  • 5
    • 20344396375 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel
    • June
    • Matthew Bunn, Steve Fetter, John Holdren, and Bob van der Zwaan, "The Economics of Reprocessing Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel," Nuclear Technology , vol. 150 (June 2005), p. 209.
    • (2005) Nuclear Technology , vol.150 , pp. 209
    • Bunn, M.1    Fetter, S.2    Holdren, J.3    Van Der Zwaan, B.4
  • 6
    • 69549096499 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dry-cask storage: How germany led the way
    • September/October
    • Klaus Janberg & Frank von Hippel, "Dry-Cask Storage: How Germany Led the Way," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, September/October 2009, vol. 65, no. 5, p. 29.
    • (2009) Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , vol.65 , Issue.5 , pp. 29
    • Janberg, K.1    Von Hippel, F.2
  • 7
    • 79954487320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • IPFM, The Path to Nuclear Disarmament
    • IPFM, Global Fissile Material Report 2009: The Path to Nuclear Disarmament. Available at www.fissilematerials.org/ipfm/site-down/gfmr09.pdf.
    • (2009) Global Fissile Material Report


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.