Opportunities for CAT applications in medical rehabilitation: Development of targeted item banks

Journal of Applied Measurement

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 315-330

  Kisala, Pamela A ^a   Tulsky, David S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPBELL; CLINICAL PRACTICES; DATA ANALYSIS; FREE FLOWING; ITEM BANK; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS; PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE DATA; QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SYSTEMATIC METHOD;

DATA REDUCTION; METADATA; PATIENT REHABILITATION; POPULATION STATISTICS; RESEARCH;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; BIOSTATISTICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOSTATISTICS; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77958143703     PISSN: 15297713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andresen, E. M., and Meyers, A. R. (2000). Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. Archives of Physical Mededicine and Rehabilitation, 5/(12 Suppl. 2), S30-S45.
2. Bode, R. K., Lai, J. S., Cella, D., and Heinemann, A. W. (2003). Issues in the development of an item bank. Archives of Physical Mededicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4 Suppl. 2), S52-S60. (Pubitemid 36417643)
3. Brennan, R. J. (2006). Linking and equating. Educational Measurement, 6, 187-220.
4. Carey, J. W., Morgan, M., and Oxtoby, M. J. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 8(3), 1-5.
5. Celia, D. (1995). Measuring quality of life in palliative care. Seminars in Oncology, 22(2 Suppl 3), 73-81.
6. Cella, D., and the Neuro-QOL Project Team. (2006). Neuro-QOL qualitative item review protocol. Unpublished Manuscript.
7. Cella, D., Gershon, R., Lai, J. S., and Choi, S. (2007). The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research, 16, 133-141. (Pubitemid 47036925)
8. Cella, D., Lai, J., and Item Banking Investigators (2004). CORE item banking program: Past, present and future, Quality of Life, 2, 5-8.
9. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl. 1), S3-S11.
10. Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. Smith, R. Harre and L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27-49). London: Sage.
11. Choppin, B. (1968). Item bank using sample-free calibration. Nature, 219, 870-72.
12. Choppin, B. (1976). Recent developments in item banking: Advances in psychological and education measurement. New York: John Wiley.
13. Choppin B. (1978). Item Banking and the monitoring of achievement. [Research in progress, Series No. 1]. Slough, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.
14. Choppin, B. (1979). Testing the questions: The Rasch model and item banking. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Education, MESA Psychometric Laboratory.
15. Choppin, B. (1981). Educational measurement and the item bank model. In C. Lacey and D. Lawton (Eds.) Issues in evaluation and accountability (pp. 87-113). London: Methuen.
16. de Bruin, A. F. (1997). The Sickness Impact Profile: SIP68, a short generic version. First evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(5), 529-540.
17. DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., and Stone, A. A., on behalf of the PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S12-S21.
18. Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives. (2009). NIH roadmap for medical research. Retrieved September 22, 2009, from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/
19. Flaugher, R. (1990). Item pools. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing (pp. 41 - 63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
21. Gorden, R. (1992). Basic interviewing skills. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
22. Hall B. (1981). Participatory research, popular knowledge, and power: A personal reflection. Convergence, 14, 6-19.
23. rd ed., pp. 147-200). New York: Macmillan.
24. Hays, R. D., Liu, H., Spritzer, K., and Cella, D. (2007). Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Medical Care, 45(Suppl. 1), S32-S38.
25. st century. Medical Care, 9(Suppl). 2), II-28-II-42.
26. Hill, C. D., Edwards, M. C., Thissen, D., Langer, M. M., Wirth, R. J., Burwinkle, T. M., et al. (2009). Practical issues in the application of item response theory: A demonstration using items from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales. Medical Care, 45(Suppl. 1), S39-S47.
27. Hoffman R. R., Neville, K., and Fowlkes J. (2006). Using concept maps to integrate results from a cognitive task analysis of system development. In A. J. Canas and J. D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (p. 25). San José, Costa Rica.
28. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., and Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of communitybased research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202. (Pubitemid 28279929)
29. Kennedy, P., Smithson, E., McClelland, M., Short, D., Royle, J., and Wilson, C. (2009). Life satisfaction, appraisals and functional outcomes in spinal cord-injured people living in the community. Spinal Cord [Epub ahead of print].
30. Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
31. Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., and Hamilton, B. B. (1994). The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Mededicine and Rehabilitation, 75(2), 127-132. (Pubitemid 24061483)
32. MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay K., and Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Journal of Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10(2), 31-36.
33. MetaMetrics. (1995). The LEXILE framework for reading. Durham, NC: Author.
34. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2007). The 2007 annual statistical report for the spinal cord injury model systems. Birmingham, AL: National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center.
35. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2009). National spinal cord injury database. Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.spinalcord.uab. edu
36. Niemeier, J., Kennedy, R., McKinley W., and Cifu, D. (2004). The loss inventory: Preliminary reliability and validity data for a new measure of emotional and cognitive responses to disability. Disability Rehabilitation, 26(10), 614-623. (Pubitemid 38771878)
37. NIH Toolbox for the assessment of behavioral and neurological function. (2009). Retrieved September 22, 2009, from http://www.nih-toolbox.org
38. QSR International. (2008). NVivo Qualitative data analysis software (Ver. 8) [Computer program]. (2008). Doncaster, VIC, Australia: Author.
39. Quality of life in neurological disorders. (2009). Retrieved September 22, 2009, from http://www.neuroqol.org
40. Reeve, B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K., Crane, P., Teresi, J., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl. 1), S22-S31.
41. Revicki, D. A., and Cella, D. F. (1997). Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing. Quality of Life Research, 6, 595-600. (Pubitemid 27431713)
42. Slavin, M. D., Kisala, P., Jette, A., and Tulsky, D. S. (in press). Developing a contemporary outcome measure for spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord.
43. Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. B. Jabine (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73-100). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Tulsky, D. S., Victorson, D., and Kisala, P. A. Developing a contemporary patient reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury research (manuscript under review).
47. Ware, J. E., Jr. (2004). Item banking and the improvement of health status measures. Quality of Life, 2, 2-5.
48. Ware, J. E., Jr., and Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 306, 473-483.
49. White, G. W., Suchowierska, M., and Campbell, M. (2004). Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Archives of Physical Mededicine and Rehabilitation, 85(4 Suppl. 2), S3-S12. (Pubitemid 38857930)
50. Willis, G. B. (1999) Cognitive interviewing: A "how to "guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Instititute.