Cutting the research budget

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 341, Issue 7777, 2010, Pages 804-805

  Dillner, Luisa ^a  

^a British Medical Journal Technology Assessment Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; BUDGET; CHINA; DNA SEQUENCE; DRUG INDUSTRY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EDITORIAL; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH PRIORITY; UNITED KINGDOM;

BUDGETS; GREAT BRITAIN; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77958121947     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c5128     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Watts G. Scientists respond to UK business secretary's warning of cuts in research funding. BMJ 2010;341:c4983. [FREE Full text]
2. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. International comparative performance of the UK research base. July 2008. http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/+/http://www.dius.gov.uk/publications/ IntComparativePerformanceUKResearch.pdf/
3. The Academy of Medical Sciences. Biomedical research - a platform for increasing health and wealth in the UK. 2010. www.acmedsci.ac.uk/p47.html
4. Wilsdon J. Damned statistics. September 2010. http://blogs.royalsociety. org/in-verba/2010/09/09/damned-statistics/.
5. Medical Research Council. MRC demonstrates excellence at world-class level. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC007211
6. Brunel University, Office of Health Economics (OHE), RAND Europe. Medical research: what's it worth? November 2008. www.brunel.ac.uk/385/other/ TAP825EconomicBenefitsReportFULLWeb.pdf.
7. Haskel J, Wallis G. Public support for innovation, intangible investment and productivity growth in the UK market sector. Imperial College Business School. February 2010. http://eprints.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/5280/1/ Haskel%202010-01.pdf.