Performance of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in determining surgical resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 732-738

  Kaneko, Osamu F ^a   Lee, Deborah M ^b   Wong, Jimmie ^a   Kadell, Barbara M ^a   Reber, Howard A ^a   Lu, David S K ^a   Raman, Steven S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Adenocarcinoma; MDCTA; Pancreatic; Preoperative evaluation

Indexed keywords

MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; SURGERY;

ACCURACY; ADENOCARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTI-DETECTORS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; PANCREATIC; PANCREATIC HEAD; PERFORMANCE; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVER METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PERITONEUM METASTASIS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77958121742     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e5d6f7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225-249.
2. Lillemoe KD. Current management of pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1995;221:133-148.
3. Balcom JH, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391-398.
4. Pedrazzoli S, Pasquali C, Sperti. General aspects of surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg. 1999;16:265-275. (Pubitemid 29376327)
5. Prokesch RW, Schima W, Chow LC, et al. Multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Diagnostic advances and therapeutic relevance. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2147-2154.
6. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:455-465.
7. Wong JC, Raman S. Surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CTA. Abdom Imaging. 2009; [Epub ahead of print].
8. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;197:381-385.
9. Karmazanovsky G, Federov V, Kubyshkin V, et al. Pancreatic head cancer: Accuracy of CT in determination of resectability. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:488-500.
10. McCarthy MJ, Evans J, Sagar G, et al. Prediction of resectability of pancreatic malignancy by computed tomography. Br J Surg. 1998;85:320-325.
11. Anderson R, Vagianos CE, Williamson RCN. Preoperative staging and evaluation of respectability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2004;6:5-12.
12. Kala Z, Valek V, Hlavsa J, et al. The role of CT and endoscopic ultrasound in pre-operative staging of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62:166-169.
13. Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: Prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:492-501.
14. Yovino S, Darwin P, Daly B, et al. Predicting unresectability in pancreatic cancer patients: The additive effects of CT and endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:36-42.
15. Manak E, Merkel S, Klein P, et al. Resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Assessment using multidetector-row computed tomography with multiplanar reformations. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:75-80.
16. Brennan DD, Zamboni GA, Raptopoulos VD, et al. Comprehensive preoperative assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with 64-section volumetric CT. Radiographics. 2007;27:1654-1667.
17. Smith SL, Basu A, Rae DM, et al. Preoperative staging accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2007;34:180-184.
18. Zamboni GA, Kruskal JB, Vollmer CM, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Value of multidetector CT angiography in preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2007;245:770-778.
19. Valls C, Andiá E, Sanchez A, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Assessment of resectability before surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:821-826.
20. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, et al. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: Criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1439-1443.
21. DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:753-763.
22. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:419-425.
23. Ellsmere J, Mortele K, Sahani D, et al. Does multidetector-row CT eliminate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma? Surg Endosc. 2005;19:369-373.
24. Hough TJ, Raptopoulos V, Siewert B, et al. Teardrop superior mesenteric vein: CT sign for unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1509-1512.