Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 408, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 6108-6116

  Yu, Cheng ^a   Yao, Yingying ^a   Hayes, Gregory ^d   Zhang, Baoxiang ^a,b   Zheng, Chunmiao ^a,c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^d 1120 Science and Engineering Offices   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater vulnerability; Hydrus1D; Transport simulation; Vadose zone

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT; ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT; FIELD DATA; GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY; HYDRUS-1D; INDEX SYSTEMS; INPUT PARAMETER; INPUT VALUES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PHYSICAL PROCESS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SHANDONG PROVINCE; SUB-AREAS; SUBMODELS; TRANSIT TIME; TRANSPORT MODELS; TRANSPORT SIMULATION; VADOSE ZONE; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; VULNERABILITY INDICATORS;

CATCHMENTS; GROUNDWATER;

RUNOFF;

GROUND WATER; RAIN;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VADOSE ZONE; VULNERABILITY;

ARTICLE; CATCHMENT; CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLANT ROOT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER TRANSPORT;

CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SOIL; WATER POLLUTANTS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

CHINA; SHANDONG;

EID: 77958100550     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aller L., Bennet T., Lehr J.H., Petty R.J., Hackett G. DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. EPA/600/2-87/035 1987, US Environmental Protection Agency, USA.
2. Babiker I.S., Mohamed M.A.A., Hiyama T., Kato K. A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Sci Total Environ 2005, 345:127-140.
3. Bazimenyera J.D.D., Tang Z.H. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Hangzhou-Jiaxing-Huzhou Plain, China. Res J Appl Sci 2008, 3(8):550-559.
4. Brouyere S., Jeannin P.Y., Dassargues A., Goldscheider N., Popescu I.C., Sauter M., et al. Evaluation and validation of vulnerability concepts using a physically based approach. 7th conference on limestone, hydrology and fissured media, Besançon, France, 20-22 September; 2001 2001, 67-72.
5. Chen S.Y., Fu G.T. A DRASTIC-based fuzzy pattern recognition methodology for groundwater vulnerability evaluation. Hydrol Sci J 2003, 48(2). April.
6. Civita M., De Maio M. SINTACS. Un sistema parametrico per la valutazione e la cartografia della vulnerabilità degli acquiferi all'inquinamento. Metodologia and Automatizzazione 1997, vol. 60. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna.
7. Connell L.D., Daele G. A quantitative approach to aquifer vulnerability mapping. J Hydrol 2003, 276(1-4):71-88.
8. Crema G., Milli M., Napoleone G., Tiberi P. Vertical vulnerability evaluation of middle-low Esino River valley alluvial aquifer (Marche, Italy). Environ Geol 1998, 34(2-3):88-94.
9. Foster S.D. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. Proceedings and Information 1987, vol. 38:69-86. TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague. W. van Duijvenbooden, H.G. van Waegeningh (Eds.).
10. Frind E.O., Molson J.W., Rudolph D.L. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection. Ground Water 2006, 44(5):732-742.
11. Fritch T.G., McKnight C.L., Joe C., Yelderman J., Arnold J.G. An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy Aquifer, Central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Environ Manage 2000, 25(3):337-345.
12. Gogu R.C., Hallet V., Dassargues A. Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Ne'blon river basin (Belgium). Environ Geol 2003, 44:881-892. 10.1007/s00254-003-0842-x.
13. Goldscheider N., Klute M., Sturm S., Hötzl H. The PI method: a GIS based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 2000, 463:157-166.
14. Gong D.Z., Kang S.Z., 2004. Measuring and Estimating Evaportranspiration of an Apple Orchard (in Chinese), Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2004-10, 35(5-6): 429-431.
15. Hölting B., Haertle T., Hohberger K.H., Nachtigall K.H., Villinger E., Weinzierl W. Conception for the evaluation of the protective function of the unsaturated stratum above the groundwater table. Geol Jahrb 1995, C63:5-24.
16. Jeannin P.Y., Grainaton F., Zwahlen F., Perrochet P. VULK: a tool for intrinsic vulnerability assessment and validation. 7th conference on limestone, hydrology and fissured media, Besançon, France, 20-22 September 2001, 185-190.
17. Kim Y.J., Hamm S. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeol J 1999, 7(2):227-235. 10.1007/s100400050195.
18. Lee S., Choi S. Groundwater pollution susceptibility assessment of Younggwang area using GIS technique (in Korean). J Korean Soc Groundw Environ 1997, 4:223-230.
19. Lynch S.D., Reynders A.G., Schulze R.E. A DRASTIC approach to groundwater vulnerability in South Africa. South African J Sci 1997, 93:59-60.
20. Martino F., Sessa S., Loia V. A fuzzy-based tool for modelization and analysis of the vulnerability of aquifers: a case study. Int J Approx Reason 2004, 38:99-111.
21. Merchant J.W. GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 1994, 60:1117-1127.
22. Mohammadi K., Niknam R., Majd V.J. Aquifer vulnerability assessment using GIS and fuzzy system: a case study in Tehran-Karaj aquifer, Iran. Environ Geol 2009, 58:437-446. 10.1007/s00254-008-1514-7.
23. Neukum C., Azzam R. Quantitative assessment of intrinsic groundwater vulnerability to contamination using numerical simulations. Sci Total Environ 2009, 408(2):245-254. 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2009.09.046.
24. Panagopoulos G.P., Antonakos A.K., Lambrakis N.J. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 2006, 1431-2174:894-911.
25. Pathak D.R., Hiratsuka A., Awata I., Chen L.N. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Environ Geol 2009, 57:1569-1578.
26. Plymale C.L., Angle M.P. Groundwater pollution potential of Fulton County, Ohio. Report No. 45. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Section 2002.
27. Simunek J., van Genuchten M.T., Sejna M. Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes. Vadose Zone J 2008, 7:587-600. 10.2136/vzj2007.0077.
28. Šimůnek J., Šejna M., Saito H., Sakai M., van Genuchten M.Th. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media 2009, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California Riverside, California.
29. Stempvoort V.D., Evert L., Wassenaar L. Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour J 1993, 18:25-37.
30. Stewart I.T., Loague K. Assessing ground water vulnerability with the type transfer function model in the Joaquin Valley, California. J Environ Qual 2004, 33:1487-1498.
31. Van Genuchten M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1980, 44:892-898.
32. Villa F., McLeod H. Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environ Manage 2002, 29(3):335-348.
33. Voigt H.J., Heinkele T., Wolter R. Characterisation of groundwater vulnerability in Germany. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. International conference, Ustron, Poland, 15-18 June; 2004 2004, 141.
34. Wang Y.R., Liu Y.Y., Zhao L.Q. A study on characteristics of photosynthesis and transpiration of Poa pratensis, Grassland of China (in Chinese), Jul 2003 2003.
35. Wang Y.X., Broder J.M., Li Y.L., Ye H., Fu S.R., Dana I. Vulnerability of groundwater in Quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuhan City, China. Environ Geol 2006, 0943-0105:479-484. 10.1007/s00254-007-0669-y.
36. Witkowski A.J., Kowalczk A. A simplified method of regional groundwater vulnerability assessment. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping, international conference, Ustron, Poland, 15-18 June; 2004 2004, 150-151.
37. Zhang Z.X., Zhou X.Y., Chen L.P. The characteristics of photosynthesis and transpiration in major vegetable crops. J Hortic (in Chinese) 1997, 1997(24):2.
38. Zhang H.W., Shen H., Chen H.L. Modified coefficients of transpiration rates responding to different soil moisture treatments. Meteorol Sci Technol (in Chinese) 2008, 36(4). Aug.
39. Zhang B.X., Yu C., Meng F.H. Fuzzy optimization assessment of drastic groundwater vulnerability based on entropy weight and GIS. Calibration and reliability in groundwater modeling "Managing groundwater and the environment". ModelCARE. Wuhan, China 2009.
40. Zheng C., Wang P.P. MT3DMS documentation and user's guide 1998, Departments of Geology and Mathematics. University of Alabama.
41. Zwahlen F. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, final report (COST action 620). European Commission, Directorate XII Science, Research and Development, Report EUR 20912, Brussels, 2004 2004, 297 pp.