Intentionality to learn in an academic domain

Early Education and Development

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 724-743

  Kulikowich, Jonna M ^a   Alexander, Patricia A ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958093412     PISSN: 10409289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2010.508210     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 213-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10-14.
3. Alexander, P. A., & the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2010). The challenges of developing competent literacy in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/Researchon21stCenturyCompetenciesPapersandPresentations.html
4. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575.
5. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). What responses to domain-specific analogy problems reveal about emerging competence: A new perspective on an old acquaintance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 397-406.
6. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students' knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
7. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topological perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176-192.
8. Allenby, B. (2005). Technology at the global scale: Integrative cognitivism and earth systems engineering and management. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding, & A. P. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 303-343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
10. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
11. Barab, S. A., Fajen, B. R., Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (1996). Assessing navigation through Pathfinder: Learning from dribble files. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 175-195.
12. Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945.
13. Bjornebekk, G. (2008). Positive affect and negative affect as modulators of cognition and motivation: The rediscovery of affect in achievement goal theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 153-170.
14. Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.
15. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain general or domain specific? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415-449.
16. Chulef, A. S., Read, S. J., & Walsh, D. A. (2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation and Emotion, 25(3), 191-232.
17. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. Gauvain, M., & Rogoff, B. (1989). Collaborative problem solving and children's planning skills. Developmental Psychology, 25, 139-151.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1986). An ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)
22. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 141-185). Chichester, England: Wiley.
23. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 287-312). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
25. Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., & Klein, G. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 129-158.
26. Iberall, A. S. (1992). Does intention have a characteristic fast time scale? Ecological Psychology, 4, 39-61.
27. Ippolito, M. F. (2005). Problem representation in Virginia Woolf's invention of a novelistic form. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding, & A. P. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 119-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Juarrero, A. (2002). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Kopp, B., Tabeling, S., Moschner, C., & Wessel, K. (2006). Fractionating the neural mechanisms of cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 949-965.
30. Kulikowich, J. M. (2007). Toward developmental trajectories: A commentary on Assessing Measures of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5(2-3), 187-194.
31. Kulikowich, J. M., & Alexander, P. A. (1994). Evaluating students' errors on cognitive tasks: Applications of polytomous item response theory and log-linear modeling. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Cognitive assessment: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 137-154). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
32. Kulikowich, J. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2003). Cognitive assessment. In L. Nadel (Ed.), The encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 526-532). London: Nature Publishing Group.
33. Kulikowich, J. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2010). Intentionality and the model of domain learning: Movement between phases and stages of academic development. Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Kulikowich, J. M., & Sedransk, N. (2010). Current and emerging design and data analysis approaches. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (2001). Locating an ecological psychology methodology for situated action. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 165-202.
36. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385-399.
37. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest, and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(1), 51-70.
38. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2006). Domain knowledge and individual interest: The effects of academic level and specialization in statistics and psychology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 30-43.
39. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K-T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodological-substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151-171.
40. Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and pattern of adaptive learning. London: Erlbaum.
41. Reynolds, R. E. (2000). Attentional resource emancipation: Toward understanding the interaction of word identification and comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 169-195.
42. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Situating cognition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 27-61.
43. Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shalin, V. L. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, brains, and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Shaw, R. E., Effken, J. A., Fajen, B. R., Garrett, S. R., & Morris, A. (1997). An ecological approach to the online assessment of problem-solving paths. Instructional Science, 25, 151-166.
47. Shaw, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1999). Ecological foundations of cognition: Volume 2. Degrees of freedom and conserved quantities in animal environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11-12), 111-123.
48. Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142-166.
49. Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Winne, P. H. (1995). Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 223-228.
51. Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 43-58.
52. Young, M. F., & Barab, S. A. (1999). Perception of the raison d'être in anchored instruction: An ecological psychology perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 119-141.