Discrepancies between research advertisements and disclosure of study locations in trial registrations for USA-sponsored research in Russia

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 431-434

  Patrone, D ^a  

^a UNION COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; REGISTER; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; STANDARD;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DISCLOSURE; HUMANS; REGISTRIES; RUSSIA;

EID: 77958084930     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.035378     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html (accessed Oct 2009).
2. Food and Drug Administration. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, Pub L No. 105e115,113, 1997.
3. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004;292:1363e4.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, Pub L 110e85. Title VIII, 801, 2007.
5. Rennie D. Trial registration: a great idea switches from ignored to irresistible. JAMA 2004;292:1359e62.
6. Krleza-Jerić K, Chan AW, Dickersin K, et al. Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement. BMJ 2005;330:956e8.
7. McCray AT. Better access to information about clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:609e14.
8. Food and Drug Administration. FDAMA section 113: status report on implementation, appendix p: trial site location letter. http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/ParticipatinginClinicalTrials/ucm148723.htm (accessed Oct 2009).
9. Emanuel E, Wendler D, Killen J, et al. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? Benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis 2004;189:930-7.
10. The Belmont Report: Ethical guidelines for the protection of human subjects. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1979.
11. London A, Kimmelman J. Justice in translation: from bench to bedside in the developing world. Lancet 2009;372:82e5.
12. Glickman S, McHutchison J, Peterson E, et al. Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. N Engl J Med 2009;360:816e23.
13. Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, et al. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials 1998;19:159e66.
14. Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC. Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2779e87.
15. Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, et al. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000144.
16. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457e6.
17. Rising K, Bacchetti P, Bero L. Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the food and drug administration: review of publication and presentation. PloS Med 2008;5:217.
18. Lee K, Bacchetti P, Sim I. Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PloS Med 2008;5:e191.
19. Ewart R, Lausen H, Millian N. Undisclosed changes in outcomes in randomized controlled trials: an observational study. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:542e6.
20. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, et al. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009;302:977e84.