Effect of cataract on electroretinographic response

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 93, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1196-1199

  Ratanapakorn, Tanapat ^a   Patarakittam, Tanikarn ^a   Sinawat, Suthasinee ^a   Sanguansak, Thuss ^a   Bhoomibunchoo, Chavakij ^a   Kaewpanna, Supat ^a   Yospaiboon, Yosanan ^a  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cataract surgery; Electroretinogram; ERG

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; B WAVE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77958084751     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cruz RD, Adachi-Usami E. Quantitative evaluation of electroretinogram before cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1989; 33: 451-7.
2. Hurst MA, Douthwaite WA. Assessing vision behind cataract-a review of methods. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 903-13.
3. Galloway NR. Electrophysiological testing of eyes with opaque media. Eye (Lond) 1988; 2(Pt 6): 615-24.
4. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831-6.
5. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S. Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 107-14.
6. Seiple W, Vajaranant TS, Szlyk JP, Clemens C, Holopigian K, Paliga J, et al. Multifocal electroretinography as a function of age: the importance of normative values for older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1783-92.
7. Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, et al. A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 122-7.
8. Arai M, Lopes de Faria JM, Hirose T. Effects of stimulus blocking, light scattering, and distortion on multifocal electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999; 43: 481-9.
9. Fishman GA. The electroretinogram. In: Fishman GA, Brich DG, Holder CE, Brigell MG, editors. Electrophysiology testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2001: 1-155.
10. Tam WK, Chan H, Brown B, Yap M. Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram. Eye (Lond) 2004; 18: 691-6.
11. Wordehoff UV, Palmowski AM, Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Allgayer R, Ruprecht KW. Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording-a pre-and postoperative comparison. Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 67-75.
12. Chan HL, Siu AW, Yap MK, Brown B. The effect of light scattering on multifocal electroretinography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 482-90.
13. Burian HM, Burns CA. A note on senile cataracts and the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1966; 20: 141-9.