Informing family members about a hereditary predisposition to cancer: Attitudes and practices among clinical geneticists

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 391-395

  Stol, Yrrah H ^a   Menko, Fred H ^b   Westerman, Marjan J ^b   Janssens, Rien M J P A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ETHICS; FAMILY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC SERVICE; GENETICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL GENETICS; NEOPLASM; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FAMILY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC SERVICES; GENETIC TESTING; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PILOT PROJECTS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 77958084581     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.033324     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vereniging Klinische Genetica Nederland (VKGN). Commissie kwaliteit: richtlijn voorspellend DNA onderzoek. [Guideline on predictive DNA research. Dutch Society for Clinical Genetics (VKGN), Committee on quality]. 2007.
2. Vereniging Klinische Genetica Nederland (VKGN): Richtlijn erfelijke darmkanker [Guideline on hereditary colorectal cancer. Dutch Society for Clinical Genetics (VKGN)]. 2007. http://www.oncoline.nl/richtlijn/item/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/item/pagina.php&richtlijn_id=545 (accessed 10 Mar 2007).
3. Stichting Opsporing Erfelijke Tumoren (STOET) & Vereniging Klinische Genetica Nederland (VKGN). Richtlijn hereditair mamma en ovariumcarcinoom [Guideline on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours (STOET) & the Dutch Society for Clinical Genetics (VKGN)]. 2007. http://www.oncoline.nl/richtlijn/item/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/item/pagina.php&richtlijn_id=446 (accessed 10 Mar 2007).
4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics 5th edn. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press, 2001.
5. Godard B, Hurlimann T, Letendre M, et al. Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use (review). Fam Cancer 2006;5:103-16.
6. Harris M, Winship I, Spriggs M. Controversies and ethical issues in cancer-genetics clinics (review). Lancet Oncol 2005;6:301-10.
7. Laurie GT. In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know. Eur J Health Law 1999;6:119-32.
8. Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, et al. Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:999-1011.
9. Suthers GK, Armstrong J, McCormack J, et al. Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder. J Med Genet 2006;43:66570.
10. Ropka M, Wenzel J, Philips E, et al. Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:840-55.
11. Evans DGR, Binchy A, Shenton A, et al. Comparison of proactive and usual approaches to offering predictive testing for BRCA1/2 mutations in unaffected relatives. Clin Genet 2009;75:124-32.
12. Aktan-Collan K, Haukkala A, Pylvänäien K, et al. Direct contact in inviting high-risk members of hereditary colon cancer families to genetic counseling and DNA testing. J Med Genet 2007;44:732-8.
13. Kohut K, Manno M, Gallinger S, et al. Should healthcare providers have a duty to warn family members of individuals with an HNPCC-causing mutation? A survey of patients from the Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry. J Med Genet 2007;44:404-7.
14. Falk MJ, Dugan RB, O'Riordan MA, et al. Medical geneticist's duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 2003;120A:374-80.
15. Dugan RB, Wisner GL, Juengst ET, et al. Duty to warn at risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors' clinical experience. Am J Med Genet (Semin Med Genet) 2003;119C:27-34.
16. Gezondheidsraad, commissie WBO. Wet bevolkingsonderzoek: de reikwijdte (2). [Health Council of the Netherlands, WBO committee. Scope of the Population Screening Act (2)] 1996.
17. Wet op het bevolkingsonderzoek. [Population Screening Act (WBO)]. 1992.
18. Parker M, Lucassen A. Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics. J Med Ethics 2003;29:70-3.
19. Knoppers BM. Genetic information and the family: are we our brother's keeper (forum)? Trends Biotechnol 2002;20:85e6.
20. Claes E, Evers Kiebooms G, Boogaerts A, et al. Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 2003;116:11-19.
21. De Wert G. Whose information is it anyway? Eur J Human Genet 2005;13:397-8.
22. Stemerding D, Nelis A. Cancer genetics and its different faces of autonomy. New Genet Soc 2006;25:1-19.
23. Biesecker B. Future direction in genetic counseling: practical and ethical considerations. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1998;8:145-60.
24. Weil J. Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. J Genet Couns 2003;12:199-211.