A framework for rule-based dynamic adaptation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6084 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 284-300

  Lanese, Ivan ^a   Bucchiarone, Antonio ^b   Montesi, Fabrizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b ITC IRST   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION RULES; DYNAMIC ADAPTATIONS; NEW APPROACHES; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; RULE BASED;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 77958076013     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15640-3_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ardagna, D., Comuzzi, M., Mussi, E., Pernici, B., Plebani, P.: PAWS: A framework for executing adaptive web-service processes. IEEE Software 24(6), 39-46 (2007)
2. Baresi, L., Guinea, S., Pasquale, L.: Self-healing BPEL processes with Dynamo and the JBoss rule engine. In: Proc. of ESSPE 2007, pp. 11-20. ACM Press, New York (2007)
3. Brun, Y., et al.: Engineering self-adaptive systems through feedback loops. In: Cheng, B.H.C., de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J. (eds.) SESAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5525, pp. 48-70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
4. Bucchiarone, A., et al.: Design for adaptation ofservice-based applications: Main issues and requirements. In: Proc. of WESOA 2009 (2009) (to appear)
5. Bucchiarone, A., Lluch Lafuente, A., Marconi, A., Pistore, M.: A formalisation of Adaptable Pervasive Flows. In: Proc. of WS-FM 2009 (2009) (to appear)
6. Bultan, T., Fu, X.: Specification of realizable service conversations using collabo-ration diagrams. Service Oriented Computing and Applications 2(1), 27-39 (2008)
7. Colombo, M., Di Nitto, E., Mauri, M.: SCENE: A service composition execution environment supporting dynamic changes disciplined through rules. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 191-202. Springer, Hei-delberg (2006)
8. Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E., Eliassen, F., Lund, K., Gjorven, E.: Using architecture models for runtime adaptability. IEEE Software 23(2), 62-70 (2006)
9. Garlan, D., Schmerl, B.: Model-based adaptation for self-healing systems. In: Proc. of WOSS 2002, pp. 27-32. ACM Press, New York (2002)
10. Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing process variants in the process life cycle. In: Proc. ofICEIS, vol. (3-2), pp. 154-161 (2008)
11. Jolie team. Jolie website, http://www.jolie-lang.org/
12. Jorba v0.1., http://www.jolie-lang.org/examples/tgc10/JoRBAv0.1.zip
13. Karastoyanova, D., Houspanossian, A., Cilia, M., Leymann, F., Buchmann, A.P.: Extending BPEL for run time adaptability. In: Proc. of EDOC 2005, pp. 15-26. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2005)
14. Kongdenfha, W., Saint-Paul, R., Benatallah, B., Casati, F.: An aspect-oriented framework for service adaptation. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 15-26. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
15. Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Self-managed systems: an architectural challenge. In: Proc. of FOSE 2007, pp. 259-268 (2007)
16. Montesi, F., Guidi, C., Zavattaro, G.: Composing services with JOLIE. In: Proc. of ECOWS 2007, pp. 13-22. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2007)
17. Narendra, N.C., Ponnalagu, K., Krishnamurthy, J., Ramkumar, R.: Run-time adaptation of non-functional properties of composite web services using aspect-oriented programming. In: Kr̈amer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 546-557. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
18. OASIS. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0., http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.html
19. Perry, D.E., Wolf, A.L.: Foundations for the study of software architecture. SIG-SOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 17(4), 40-52 (1992)
20. Spanoudakis, G., Zisman, A., Kozlenkov, A.: A service discovery framework for service centric systems. In: Proc. of SCC 2005, pp. 251-259. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2005)
21. Taylor, R.N., van der Hoek, A.: Software design and architecture: The once and future focus of software engineering. In: Proc. of FOSE 2007, pp. 226-243 (2007)
22. van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Mod-els to Software Specifications. Wiley, Chichester (2009)
23. Verma, K., Gomadam, K., Sheth, A.P., Miller, J.A., Wu, Z.: The meteor-s approach for configuring and executing dynamic web processes. Technical report, University of Georgia, Athens (2005)
24. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1., http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl