The Metrô Rio ATP case study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6371 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-16

  Ferrari, Alessio ^a   Grasso, Daniele ^b   Magnani, Gianluca ^b   Fantechi, Alessandro ^b   Tempestini, Matteo ^a  

^a General Electric Transportation Systems (GETS)   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT INTERPRETATIONS; AUTOMATIC CODE GENERATIONS; AUTOMATIC TRAIN PROTECTION SYSTEMS; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN PRACTICE; FORMAL MODEL; MODEL BASED DEVELOPMENT; MODEL BASED TESTING; ON-BOARD EQUIPMENT; QUANTITATIVE RESULT; RUN-TIME ERRORS; VERIFICATION TASK;

ABSTRACTING; AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMING;

FORMAL METHODS;

EID: 77958063765     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15898-8_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization: CENELEC EN 50128, Railway Applications-Software for Railway Control and Protection Systems (1997)
2. Ferrari, A., Fantechi, A., Bacherini, S., Zingoni, N.: Modeling Guidelines for Code Generation in the Railway Signaling Context. In: 1st NASA Formal Methods Sym-phosium (NFM), Moffet Field, California, U.S.A. (2009)
3. Harel, D.: Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems. Science of Computer Programming 8(3), 231-274 (1987)
4. Hamon, G., Rushby, J.: An operational semantics for stateflow. In: Wermelinger, M., Margaria-Steffen, T. (eds.) FASE 2004. LNCS, vol. 2984, pp. 229-243. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
5. Hamon, G.: A denotational semantics for stateflow. In: 5th ACM Int. Conf. on Embedded Software, Jersey City, NJ, USA, pp. 164-172 (2005)
6. Mathworks Automotive Advisory Board (MAAB): Control Algorithm Modeling Guidelines Using Matlab, Simulink and Stateflow, Version 2.0 (2007), http://www.mathworks.com/industries/auto/maab.html
7. Sahbani, A., Pascal, J.C.: Simulation of hybrid systems using stateflow. In: Pro-ceedings of the 14th European Simulation Multiconference on Simulation and Mod-elling: Enablers for a Better Quality of Life, pp. 271-275 (2000)
8. Scaife, N., et al.: Defining and translating a safe subset of simulink/stateflow into lustre. In: 4th ACM Int. Conf. on Embedded Software, Pisa, Italy, pp. 259-268 (2004)
9. Bacherini, S., Fantechi, A., Tempestini, M., Zingoni, N.: A Story about Formal Methods Adoption by a Railway Signaling Manufacturer. In: Misra, J., Nipkow, T., Sekerinski, E. (eds.) FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4085, pp. 179-189. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Conrad, M.: Testing-based translation validation of generated code in the con-text of IEC 61508. In: Formal Methods in System Design, pp. 389-401. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Baresel, A., Conrad, M., Sadeghipour, S., Wegener, J.: The interplay between model coverage and code coverage. In: Proceedings of the 11th Eur. int. Conf. on Software Testing, Analysis and Review EuroSTAR'03, Amsterdam, Netherlands (2003)
12. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: 4th ACM Symp. on Principles ofProgramming Languages (POPL), Los Angeles, California, pp. 238-252 (1977)
13. Grasso, D., Fantechi, A., Ferrari, A.: Model Based Testing and Abstract Inter-pretation in the Railway Signaling Context. In: 3rd International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Paris, France, pp. 103-106 (2010)
14. Deutsch, A.: Static verification of dynamic properties. PolySpace White Paper (2004)
15. Ferrari, A., Fantechi, A., Papini, M., Grasso, D.: An industrial application offor-mal model based development: the Metr̂o Rio ATP case. In: 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering for Resilient Systems, SERENE 2010 (2010)
16. Faivre, A., Benoit, P.: Safety critical software of meteor developed with the B formal method and vital coded processor. In: Proc. ofWCRR'99, pp. 84-89 (1999)
17. Guiho, G., Hennebert, A.: SACEM Software Validation. In: 12th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 186-191 (1990)
18. Leuschel, M., et al.: Automated property verification for large scale B models. In: Cavalcanti, A., Dams, D.R. (eds.) FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5850, pp. 810-814. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)