Finding feasible systems in the presence of constraints on multiple performance measures

ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Batur, Demet ^a   Kim, Seong Hee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple performance measures; Ranking and selection; Stochastic constraints

Indexed keywords

FINITE NUMBER; GENERIC PROCEDURES; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; RANKING AND SELECTION; SIMULATED SYSTEM; STOCHASTIC CONSTRAINTS;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

EID: 77958059413     PISSN: 10493301     EISSN: 15581195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1842713.1842716     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ANDRADÓTTIR, S., GOLDSMAN, D., AND KIM, S.-H.2005.Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation.In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.M.E.Kuhl, N.M.Steiger, F.B.Armstrong, and J.A.Joine Eds., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 732-738.
2. ANDRADÓTTIR, S.AND KIM, S.-H.2010.Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation.Naval Res.Logistics 57, 403-421.
3. BATUR, D.AND KIM, S.-H.2005.Finding the set of feasible systems when the number of systems or constraints is large.In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.M.E.Kuhl, N.M.Steiger, F.B.Armstrong, and J.A.Joines Eds., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 692-698.
4. BATUR, D.AND KIM, S.-H.2006.Fully sequential selection procedures with parabolic boundary.IIE Trans.38, 749-764.
5. BUTLER, J.,MORRICE, D.J., ANDMULLARKEY, P.W.2001.Amultiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection.Manag.Sci.47, 800-816.
6. GOLDSMAN, D., KIM, S.-H., AND NELSON, B.L.2005.Statistical selection of the best system.In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.M.E.Kuhl, N.M.Steiger, F.B.Armstrong, and J.A.Joines Eds., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 178-187.
7. KIM, S.-H.AND NELSON, B.L.2001.A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation.ACM Trans.Model.Comput.Simul.11, 3, 251-273.
8. KIM, S.-H.AND NELSON, B.L.2006a.On the asymptotic validity of fully sequential selection procedures for steady-state simulation.Oper.Res.54, 475-488.
9. KIM, S.-H.AND NELSON, B.L.2006b.Selecting the best.In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science:Simulation, S.G.Henderson and B.L.Nelson Eds., Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, 501-534.
10. MALONE, G.J., KIM, S.-H., GOLDSMAN, D., AND BATUR, D.2005.Performance of variance updating procedures on various data.In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.M.E.Kuhl, N.M.Steiger, F.B.Armstrong, and J.A.Joines Eds., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, 825-832.
11. NELSON, B.L., SWANN, J., GOLDSMAN, D., AND SONG, W.2001.Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large.Oper.Res.49, 950-963.
12. RINOTT, Y.1978.On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities.Comm.Stat.-Thy.and Meth A7, 799-811.
13. SANTNER, T.AND TAMHANE, A.1984.Designing experiments for selecting a normal population with a large mean and a small variance.In Design of Experiments-Ranking and Selection: Essays in Honor of Robert E.Bechhofer.Marcel-Dekker, New York, 179-198.