Why university-industry partnerships matter

Science Translational Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 51, 2010, Pages

  Boccanfuso, Anthony M ^a  

^a NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; DRUG INDUSTRY; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INVESTMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; TEAMWORK; UNIVERSITY; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; ECONOMICS; INDUSTRY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; INDUSTRY; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77958053910     PISSN: 19466234     EISSN: 19466242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001066     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. "Sparking economic growth: How federally funded university research creates innovation, new companies and jobs." The Science Coalition, April 2010. www.pagegangster. com/p/VlM3O/ (accessed 6 September 2010).
2. H. Ledford, The future of pharma. Nature News 9 October 2008 (10.1038/news.2008.1161).
3. K. Wilgenbus, R. Hill, A. Warrander, S. Kakkar, E. Steiness, R. Wessel, What pharma wants. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 967-969 (2007).
4. University-Private Sector Research Partnerships in the Innovation Ecosystem (President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2008). www.nasa.gov/pdf/404101main-past-research-partnership-report- BOOK.pdf (accessed 6 September 2010).
5. C. W. Wessner, Ed., "An Assessment of the SBIR Program, National Research Council" (2008). www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=11989 (accessed 6 September 2010).
6. "Guiding Principles for University-Industry Endeavors," National Council of University Research Administrators, 2006. www.ncura.edu/content/regions-and-neighborhoods/resources/docs/guidance.pdf (accessed 6 September 2010).
7. Academic R&D Expenditures, FY 2008, NSF 10-311, April 2010. www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10311/pdf/nsf10311.pdf (accessed 6 September 2010).
8. Engineering Research Center Fact Sheet, National Science Foundation, 11 June 2009.
9. B. Butkus, Texas A&M's use of tech commercialization as basis for awarding tenure gains traction. Biotech Transfer Week, 6 August 2007. http://2429-genomeweb. voxcdn.com/biotechtransferweek/texas-am's-use- techcommercialization- basis-awarding-tenure-gainstraction (accessed 6 September 2010).
10. Contract Accords, Georgia Tech University, University-Industry Demonstration Partnership, 2009. www.otl.gtrc. gatech.edu/documents/UIDP- Contract-Accords-Booklet. pdf (accessed 6 September 2010).
11. Responsibility of Applicants for Promoting Objectivity in Research Which Public Health Service Funding Sought and Responsible Prospective Contractors, Proposed Rule, Federal Register 75, No. 98 /21 May, 2010. www. thefederalregister.com/d.p/2010-05-21-2010-11885 (accessed 6 September 2010).
12. B. Lo, M. J. Field, Eds., Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice [Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC, 2009]. www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book= nap12598 (accessed 5 September 2010).
13. Internal Revenue Bulletin, 2007-29, 16 July 2007. www. irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb07-29.pdf (accessed 6 September 2010).
14. www.health.qld.gov.au/ohmr/default.asp (accessed 13 September 2010).
15. See chart in (6).
16. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, National Patterns of R&D Resources. Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/ seind10/figures. htm#c4; see figure 4-3 (accessed 17 September 2010).
17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Main Science and Technology Indicators (2009/1). Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/ figures. htm#c4; see figure 4-19 (accessed 17 September 2010).
18. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Government-University- Industry Research Roundtable or the National Academies. Competing interests: The author declares that he has no competing interests.