Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 499-511

  Arza, Valeria ^a   Vazquez, Claudia ^a  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;

ARGENTINA;

EID: 77958041274     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234210X512728     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agrawal, A and R Henderson 2002. Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Arza, V 2010. Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 473-484.
3. Arza, V and A López 2009. Firms' linkages with public research organisations in Argentina: drivers and effects of interacting from a firm perspective, No. DT 38, pp 1-38. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Documentos de Trabajo de CENIT.
4. Bercovitz, J and M Feldman 2003. Technology transfer and the academic department: who participates and why? Paper presented at DRUID Summer Conference on Creating, sharing and transferring knowledge. The role of geography, institutions and organizations, held 12-14 June 2003, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5. Blumenthal, D 1996. Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships in the life sciences: the continuing debate. Academic Medicine, 71(12), 1291-1296.
6. Blumenthal, D, E G Campbell, M S Anderson, N Causino and K S Louis 1997. Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1224-1228.
7. Blumenthal, D, E G Campbell, N Causino and K S Louis 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
8. Blumenthal, D, E G Campbell, M Gokhale, R Yucel, B Clarridge, S Hilgartner and N A Holtzman 2006. Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: prevalences and predictors. Academic Medicine, 81(2), 137-145.
9. Campbell, E G and D Blumenthal 1999. Perils of university- industry collaboration. Issues in Science and Technology, 16(1), 15-15.
10. Campbell, T I D and S Slaughter 1999. Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. Journal of Higher Education, 70(3), 309-352.
11. Cohen, W, R Florida, L Randazzese and J Walsh 1998. Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In Challenge to the Research University, R Noll ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
12. Cohen, W M, R R Nelson and J P Walsh 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
13. D'Este, P and P Patel 2007. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
14. Dasgupta, P and P David 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
15. Dávila, M 2006. Vinculación Universidad-Sector Productivo-Estado En La Facultad De Agronomía De La Universidad De Buenos Aires: La Apertura Al Medio Como Eje De Transformación Institucional. In La Vinculación Universidad- Empresa: Miradas Críticas Desde La Universidad Pública,S Llomovatte, F Juarros, J Naidorf and A Guelman eds., pp 117-169. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Miño y Dávila editores.
16. Defazio, D, A Lockett and M Wright 2009. Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: evidence from the EU Framework Program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293-305.
17. Florida, R 1999. The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 67-73.
18. Fontana, R, A Geuna and M Matt 2006. Factors affecting university- industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.
19. Gelijns, A C and S O Thier 2002. Medical innovation and institutional interdependence - rethinking university-industry connections. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(1), 72-77.
20. Geuna, A 2001. The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607-632.
21. Godfrey, S 2005. Power and knowledge: the role of industry partners in knowledge-intensive networks in new materials technology. Industry and Higher Education, 19(2), 189-197.
22. Juarros, F 2006. Vinculación Universidad-Estado-Sector De La Producción De Bienes Y Servicios, Vista Por Los Docentes Investigadores. El Caso De La Facultad De Farmacia Y Bioquímica De La Universidad De Buenos Aires. In S Llomovatte, F Juarros, J Naidorf and A Guelman (eds.), La Vinculación Universidad- Empresa: Miradas Críticas Desde La Universidad Pública,S Llomovatte, F Juarros, J Naidorf and A Guelman eds., pp 171-210. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Miño y Dávila editores.
23. Landry, R, N Amara and M Ouimet 2007. Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 561-592.
24. Laursen, K and A Salter 2004. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215.
25. Lee, Y S 1996. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843-863.
26. Link, A N and J Rees 1990. Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small business economics, 2(1), 25-31.
27. Lugones, G and M Lugones 2004. Bariloche Y Su Grupo De Empresas Intensivas En Conocimiento: Realidades Y Perspectivas. Documentos de trabajo Centro Redes, No. 17. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
28. Mansfield, E 1991. Academic research and industrial-innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), 1-12.
29. Mansfield, E 1998. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26(7/8), 773-776.
30. Meyer-Krahmer, F and U Schmoch 1998. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
31. Mollis, M and S Marginson 2002. The assessment of universities in Argentina and Australia: between autonomy and heteronomy. Higher Education, 43(3), 311-330.
32. Moori-Koenig, V and G Yoguel 1998. El Desarrollo De Capacidades Innovativas De Las Firmas En Un Medio De Escaso Desarrollo Del Sistema Local De Innovación. Río de Janeiro: Nota Técnica 20/98, pp. 1-36.
33. Nelson, R R 2004. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
34. Parkinson, S and C Langley 2009. Stop the Sell-Out! New Scientist, 204(2733), 32-33.
35. Patel, P and K Pavitt 1995. The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. STI Review No. 14, pp 9-32. Paris: OECD.
36. Riquelme, G ed. 2008. Las Universidades Frente a Las Demandas Sociales Y Productivas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Miño y Dávila.
37. Rosenberg, N 1992. Scientific instrumentation and university research. Research Policy, 21(4), 381-90.
38. Rosenberg, N 1996. Uncertainty and technological change. In The Mosaic of Economic Growth,R Landau, T Taylor and M Wright eds. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Rosenberg, N and R R Nelson 1994. American universities and technical advance, Research Policy, 23(3), 323-348.
40. Salter, A J and B R Martin 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532.
41. Slaughter, S and L Leslie 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42. Slaughter, S, T Campbell, M Holleman and E Morgan 2002. The 'traffic' in graduate students: graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(2), 282-313.
43. Stokes, D E 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
44. Thorn, K 2005. Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación en Argentina - Un Perfil sobre temas yprácticas. Washington DC: World Bank.
45. Yoguel, G and M Lopez 2000. Sistemas Locales De Innovación Y El Desarrollo De La Capacidad Innovativa De Las Firmas: Las Evidencias Del Cuasi-Distrito Industrial De Rafaela. Redes, 7(15) 45-94.