Genetics, phosphorus availability, and herbivore-derived induction as sources of phenotypic variation of leaf volatile terpenes in a pine species

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 61, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 4437-4447

  Sampedro, Luis ^a   Moreira, Xoaquín ^a   Llusia, Joan ^b   Peñuelas, Josep ^b   Zas, Rafael ^a  

^a MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chemical defence; conifer; constitutive defences; genetic variation; induced defences; leaf volatile terpenes; methyl jasmonate; phenotypic plasticity; Pinus pinaster

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALPHA-PINENE; BETA PINENE; BETA-PINENE; BICYCLO COMPOUND; CYCLOPENTANE DERIVATIVE; JASMONIC ACID METHYL ESTER; OXYLIPIN; PHOSPHORUS; PINENE; TERPENE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INHERITANCE; ISOMERISM; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PINE; PLANT LEAF; SEEDLING; VOLATILIZATION;

ACETIC ACIDS; BICYCLO COMPOUNDS; CYCLOPENTANES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETIC VARIATION; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; ISOMERISM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONOTERPENES; OXYLIPINS; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHORUS; PINUS; PLANT LEAVES; SEEDLING; TERPENES; VOLATILIZATION;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 77958037900     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq246     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Johnson MT, Wallsgrove R. 2002. Ecological genetics of induced plant defense against herbivores: additive genetic variation and costs of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 56, 2206-2213.
2. Arrabal C, Cortijo M, Fernández De Simó n B, García Vallejo MC, Cadahía E. 2005. Differentiation among five Spanish Pinus pinaster provenances based on its oleoresin terpenic composition. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 33, 1007-1016.
3. Baradat PH, Bernard-Dagan C, Fillon C, Marpeau A, Pauly G. 1972. Les terpè nes du Pin maritime: aspects biologiques et gé né tiques. Il hé ré dité De la teneur en monoterpè nes. Annals of Forest Science 29, 307-334.
4. Barnola LF, Cedeñ o A. 2000. Inter-population differences in the essential oils of Pinus caribaea needles. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 28, 923-931.
5. Bauce É , Cré pin M, Carisey N. 1994. Spruce budworm growth, development and food utilization on young and old balsam fir trees. Oecologia 97, 499-507.
6. Blanch J-S, Peñ uelas J, Sardans J, Llusia J. 2009. Drought, warming and soil fertilization effects on leaf volatile terpene concentrations in Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 31, 207-218.
7. Bohlmann J. 2008. Insect-induced terpenoid defenses in spruce. In: Schaller A, ed. Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 173-187.
8. Bonneau M. 1995. Fertilisation des fôrets dans les pays tempérés: théorie, bases du diagnostic, conseils pratiques, réalisations expérimentales. Nancy, France: ENGREF.
9. Bryant JP, Chapin III FS, Klein DR. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation with vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40, 357-368.
10. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230, 895-899.
11. Donaldson JR, Lindroth RL. 2007. Genetics, environment, and their interaction determine efficacy of chemical defense in trembling aspen. Ecology 88, 729-739.
12. Erbilgin N, Powell JS, Raffa KF. 2003. Effect of varying monoterpene concentrations on the response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone: implications for pest management and ecology of bark beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5, 269-274.
13. Fady B, Arbez M, Marpeau A. 1992. Geographic variability of terpene composition in Abies cephalonica Loudon and Abies species around the Aegean: hypotheses for their possible phylogeny from the Miocene. Trees\-Structure and Function 6, 162-171.
14. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: Longman Scientific and Technical.
15. Franceschi V, Krekling T, Christiansen E. 2002. Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies (Pinaceae) stems induces defense-related responses in phloem and xylem. American Journal of Botany 89, 578-586.
16. Gijzen M, Lewinsohn E, Savage T, Croteau R. 1993. Conifer monoterpenes. In: Teranishi R, Buttery R, Sugisawa H, eds. Bioactive volatile compounds from plants, Vol. 525. Washington, DC: ACS Symposium Series, 8-22.
17. Heijari J, Nerg A-M, Kainulainen P, Viiri H, Vuorinen M, Holopainen JK. 2005. Application of methyl jasmonate reduces growth but increases chemical defence and resistance against Hylobius abietis in Scots pine seedlings. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115, 117-124.
18. Heil M. 2008. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytologist 178, 41-61.
19. Heyworth CJ, Iason GR, Temperton V, Jarvis PG, Duncan AJ. 1998. The effect of elevated CO2 concentration and nutrient supply on carbon-based plant secondary metabolites in Pinus sylvestris L. Oecologia 115, 344-350.
20. Hilker M, Kobs C, Varama M, Schrank K. 2002. Insect egg deposition induces Pinus to attract egg parasitoids. Journal of Experimental Biology 205, 455-461.
21. Holopainen JK, Heijari J, Nerg A-M, Vuorinen M, Kainulainen P. 2009. Potential for the use of exogenous chemical elicitors in disease and insect pest management of conifer seedling production. The Open Forest Science Journal 2, 17-24.
22. Huber DP, Ralph S, Bohlmann J. 2004. Genomic hardwiring and phenotypic plasticity of terpenoid-based defenses in conifers. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30, 2399-2418.
23. Huber DPW, Philippe RN, Madilao LL, Sturrock RN, Bohlmann J. 2005. Changes in anatomy and terpene chemistry in roots of Douglas-fir seedlings following treatment with methyl jasmonate. Tree Physiology 25, 1075-1083.
24. Jactel H, Kleinhentz M, Marpeau-Bezard A, Marion-Poll F, Menassieu P, Burban C. 1996. Terpene variations in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection by Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 1037-1050.
25. Kainulainen P, Holopainen J, Palomäki V, Holopainen T. 1996. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on secondary chemistry and ectomycorrhizal state of Scots pine seedlings and on growth of grey pine aphid. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 617-636.
26. Kainulainen P, Utriainen J, Holopainen JK, Oksanen J, Holopainen T. 2000. Influence of elevated ozone and limited nitrogen availability on conifer seedlings in an open-air fumigation system: effects on growth, nutrient content, mycorrhiza, needle ultrastructure, starch and secondary compounds. Global Change Biology 6, 345-355.
27. Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E, Keinanen M. 1998. Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta-analysis. Oikos 83, 212-226.
28. Krokene P, Nagy NE, Solheim H. 2008. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiology 28, 29-35.
29. Lindgren BS, Nordlander G, Birgersson G. 1996. Feeding deterrence of verbenone to the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (L.) (Col., Curculionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 120, 397-403.
30. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger R, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
31. Litvak ME, Monson RK. 1998. Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory. Oecologia 114, 531-540.
32. Lombardero MJ, Ayres MP, Lorio PL, Ruel JJ. 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecology Letters 3, 329-339.
33. Llusia J, Peñuelas J. 2001. Emission of volatile organic compounds by apple trees under spider mite attack and attraction of predatory mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25, 65-77.
34. Martin D, Tholl D, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J. 2002. Methyl jasmonate induces traumatic resin ducts, terpenoid resin biosynthesis, and terpenoid accumulation in developing xylem of Norway spruce stems. Plant Physiology 129, 1003-1018.
35. Martin DM, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J. 2003. Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce. Plant Physiology 132, 1586-1599.
36. Martíns P, Sampedro L, Moreira X, Zas R. 2009. Nutritional status and genetic control of phenotypic plasticity to nutrient availability in Pinus pinaster. A multisite field study in NW Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1429-1436.
37. Moreira X, Sampedro L, Zas R. 2009. Defensive responses of Pinus pinaster seedlings to exogenous application of methyl-jasmonate: concentration effect and systemic response. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67, 94-100.
38. Moreira X, Sampedro L, Zas R, Solla A. 2008. Alterations of the resin canal system of Pinus pinaster seedlings after fertilization of a healthy and of a Hylobius abietis attacked stand. Trees 22, 771-777.
39. Mumm R, Hilker M. 2006. Direct and indirect chemical defence of pine against folivorous insects. Trends in Plant Science 11, 351-358.
40. Mumm R, Tiemann T, Schulz S, Hilker M. 2004. Analysis of volatiles from black pine (Pinus nigra): significance of wounding and egg deposition by a herbivorous sawfly. Phytochemistry 65, 3221-3230.
41. Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ovaska J, Keinanen M, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vapaavuori E. 2000. Herbivore resistance in Betula pendula: effect of fertilization, defoliation, and plant genotype. Ecology 81, 49-65.
42. Nault JR, Manville JF, Sahota TS. 1999. Spruce terpenes: expression and weevil resistance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29, 761-767.
43. O'Reilly-Wapstra JM, Iason GR, Thoss V. 2006. The role of genetic and chemical variation of Pinus sylvestris seedlings in influencing slug herbivory. Oecologia 152, 82-91.
44. Ohnmeiss TE, Baldwin IT. 2000. Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. Ecology 81, 1765-1783.
45. Ormeño E, Baldy V, Ballini C, Fernandez C. 2008. Production and diversity of volatile terpenes from plants on calcareous and siliceous soils: effect of soil nutrients. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34, 1219-1229.
46. 2 affect secondary metabolism and ecosystem function? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 20-24.
47. Peñ uelas J, Llusia J. 2001. The complexity of factors driving volatile organic compound emissions by plants. Biologia Plantarum 44, 481-487.
48. Peñ uelas J, Llusia J. 2003. BVOCs: plant defense against climate warming? Trends in Plant Science 8, 105-109.
49. Peñ uelas J, Llusia J. 2004. Plant VOC emissions: making use of the unavoidable. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 402-404.
50. Peñ uelas J, Llusia J, Estiarte M. 1995. Terpenoids: a plant language. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 289.
51. Peñ uelas J. Staudt M. 2010. BVOCs and global change. Trends in Plant Science 15, 133-144.
52. Phillips MA, Croteau RB. 1999. Resin-based defenses in conifers. Trends in Plant Science 4, 184-190.
53. Pureswaran DS, Gries R, Borden JH. 2004. Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32, 1109-1136.
54. Raffa KF. 2001. Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11, 49-65.
55. Schurgers G, Arneth A, Holzinger R, Goldstein A. 2009. Process-based modelling of biogenic monoterpene emissions combining production and release from storage. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 9, 271-307.
56. Stamp N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78, 23-55.
57. Thoss V, Byers JA. 2006. Monoterpene chemodiversity of ponderosa pine in relation to herbivory and bark beetle colonization. Chemoecology 16, 51-58.
58. Tomlin ES, Borden JH, Pierce HD. 1997. Relationship between volatile foliar terpenes and resistance of Sitka spruce to the white pine weevil. Forest Science 43, 501-508.
59. Trapp S, Croteau R. 2001. Defensive resin biosynthesis in conifers. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 689-724. (Pubitemid 33720052)
60. Turtola S, Manninen AM, Holopainen JK, Levula T, Raitio H, Kainulainen P. 2002. Secondary metabolite concentrations and terpene emissions of Scots pine xylem after long-term forest fertilization. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1694-1701.
61. Van Dam NM, De Jong TJ, Iwasa Y, Kubo T. 1996. Optimal distribution of defences: are plants smart investors? Functional Ecology 10, 128-136.
62. Viiri H, Annila E, Kitunen V, Niemela P. 2001. Induced responses in stilbenes and terpenes in fertilized Norway spruce after inoculation with blue-stain fungus. Ceratocystis polonica. Trees\-Structure and Function 15, 112-122.
63. Wainhouse D, Ashburner R, Ward E, Rose J. 1998. The effect of variation in light and nitrogen on growth and defence in young Sitka Spruce. Functional Ecology 12, 561-572.
64. Wainhouse D, Staley JT, Jinks R, Morgan G. 2008. Growth and defence in young pine and spruce and the expression of resistance to a stem-feeding weevil. Oecologia 158, 641-650.
65. Walinga I, Van Der Lee J, Houba VJG. 1995. Plant analysis manual. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
66. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA. 1992. Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz R, Simms E, eds. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens, ecology, evolution and genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 363-391.
67. Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR. 1987. Furanocoumarins in wild parsnip: effects of photosynthetically active radiation, ultraviolet radiation, and nutrients. Ecology 68, 516-520.
68. Zangerl AR, Rutledge CE. 1996. Probability of attack and patterns of constitutive and induced defense: a test of optimal defense theory. American Naturalist 147, 599-608.
69. Zas R, Sampedro L, Moreira X, Martíns P. 2008. Effect of fertilization and genetic variation on susceptibility of Pinus radiata seedlings to Hylobius abietis damage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 63-72.
70. Zas R, Sampedro L, Prada E, Lombardero MJ, Fernández-Ló pez J. 2006. Fertilization increases Hylobius abietis L. damage in Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 222, 137-144.
71. Zeneli G, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T, Gershenzon J. 2006. Methyl jasmonate treatment of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees increases the accumulation of terpenoid resin components and protects against infection by Ceratocystis polonica, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiology 26, 977-988.
72. Zou J, Cate RG. 1995. Foliage constituents of douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco): Their seasonal variation and potential role in douglas fir resistance and silviculture management. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 387-402.