An economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) power plants: A case study for the City of Kiel

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1069-1088

  Lindner, Sören ^a   Peterson, Sonja ^b,c   Windhorst, Wilhelm ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b KIEL INSTITUTE FOR THE WORLD ECONOMY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Cash flow analysis; Coal fired power plants; Life cycle analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ENERGY MARKET; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS;

GERMANY; KIEL; SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN;

EID: 77958024788     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.505783     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bohm, M., 2006. Capture-ready power plants options, technologies and economics. Thesis (Masters). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bohm, M., et al., 2007. Capture-ready coal plants options, technologies and economics. International journal of greenhousegas control, 1, 113-120.
3. Chandler, H. ed., 2000. Heavy construction cost data. 14th annual edition. Kingston, MA: R.S. Mean Company.
4. Dahmke, 2008. Projekt MoPa: Hydrochemische Szenarienmodellierung und Gefährdungs abschätzung für potentielle CO2-Einträge in oberflächennahe Grundwasserleiter [online]. Available from: http://www.planeterde.de/Members/huenken/BMBF%20Projekte/co2mopa [Accessed 2 July 2009].
5. Eco Institute, 2008. Global Emission Model for Integrated Systems (GEMIS), version 4.5. [online]. Available from: http://www.gemis.de/en/index.htm [Accessed 2 July 2009].
6. European Commission, 2008. Proposal for a directive on the geological storage of carbon dioxide [online]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/ccs/eccp1_en. htm [Accessed 2 July 2009].
7. Freischlad, H., et al., 2008. Vergleich von Heizkraftwerksvarianten für die Stadtwerke Kiel. Technische, wirtschaftliche und ökologische Bewertung. Endbericht [online]. Available from: http://www.stadtwerke-kiel.de/pdf/unternehmen/endbericht_gkk.pdf [Accessed 2 July 2009]
8. Gerlagh, R. and van der Zwaan, B., 2006. Options and instruments for a deep cut in CO2 emissions: carbon dioxide capture or renewables, taxes or subsidies. The energy journal, 27 (3),25-48.
9. Gray, D. and Tomlinson, G., 2002. Hydrogen from coal. Mitretek Technical Paper. MTR 2003-31.
10. Guinee, J.B. ed., 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Boston.
11. Hendricks, C., Graus, W., and van Bergen, F., 2004. Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Report Ecofys and TNO, Ecofys Report EEP02001.
12. Hendricks, C., Wildenborg, T., Feron, P., Graus, W. and Brandsma, R., 2003. EC-Case. Carbondioxide sequestration M70066, Dec 2003. Utrecht: Ecofgs/TNO.
13. IEA GHG, 2002. Transmission of CO2 and energy. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report PH4/6, IEA GHG.
14. IEA GHG, 2004. Improvements in power generation with post-combustion capture of CO2. Report PH4/33. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
15. IEA, 2008. World energy outlook 2008. Paris: International Energy Agency.
16. IFEU, 2007. Life Cycle Assessment, Software Umberto [online]. Available from: http:// www.ifeu.de/english/index.php?bereich1/4oek&seite1/4umberto [Accessed 2 July 2009].
17. IPCC, 2005. IPCC Special report on carbon capture and sequestration. IPCC, 2007. IPCC fourth assessment report.
18. Lackner, K.S. and Sachs, J.D., 2005. A robust strategy for sustainable energy use. Brookings papers on economic activity, 2, 215-284.
19. Lecoq, F. and Chomitz, K., 2001. Optimal use of carbon sequestration in a global climate change strategy: is there a wooden bridge to a clean energy future? Policy Research Working Paper 2635. World Bank Development Economic Research Group, Infrastructure and Environment.
20. May, F., Muller, C., and Bernstone, C., 2005. How much CO2 can be stored in deep saline aquifers in Germany? VGB power tech, 6/2005, 32-37.
21. Narita, D., 2008. The use of CCS in global carbon management: simulation with the DICE model. Kiel working paper, 1440. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
22. 2removal. Report by US DOE/NETL, Pittsburgh, PA.
23. Praetorius, B. and Schumacher, K., 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: the role of carbon capture and storage. DIW discussion papers, 820. Berlin: Deutsche Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW).
24. Rubin, E., Rao, A., and Chen, C., 2005. Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Volume 1.
25. Sekar, R.C., et al., 2007. Future carbon regulations and current investments in alternative coal-fired power plants design. Energy policy, 35, 1064-1074.
26. Stern, N., 2007. The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press.
27. van der Zwaan, B. and Gerlagh, R., 2008. Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage. Amsterdam: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands.
28. Viebahn, P. and Nitsch, J., 2007. Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic and ecological aspects in Germany. International journal of greenhouse gas control, 1, 121-133.
29. Wildenborg, T., et al., 2005. Cost curve for CO2 storage, European sector. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (2004), Vancouver, Canada.
30. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2006. Facts and trends of carbon capture and storage [online]. Available from: http://www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/facts&trends-ccs.pdf [Accessed 2 July 2009].
31. Wuppertal Institute, 2008. Ecological, economic and structural comparison of renewable energy technology with carbon capture and storage an integrated approach. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU).