Water quality criteria at home and abroad: Development trend and existed problems

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2049-2056

  Zhang, Rui Qing ^a,b   Wu, Feng Chang ^c   Li, Hui Xian ^c   Cao, Yu Jing ^c   Su, Hai Lei ^c   Lin, Ying ^c   Zhao, Xiao Li ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOCHEMISTRY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Water environment; Water quality criteria; Water quality management

Indexed keywords

POLLUTION CONTROL; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD (REGULATION); TREND ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

CHINA;

EID: 77958024038     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aldenberg T, Slob W. 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on log-logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 25:
2. ANZECC 6 and ARMCANZ (Austrian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand). 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australia: ANZECC and ARMCANZ.
3. California State Water Pollution Control Board. 1952. Water quality criteria. Sacramento: California State Water Pollution Control Board.
4. CCME. 1998. Recreational Water Quality Guidelines and Aesthetics. Winnipeg: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
5. CCME. 1999a. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Introduction. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
6. CCME. 1999b. A Protocol for the Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
7. CCME. 1999c. Protocols for Deriving Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Agricultural Water Uses. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
8. CCME. 2007. A Protocol for the Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
9. Crump KS. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 4:854-871.
10. Crump KS, Landingham CV, Shamlay C, et al. 2000. Benchmark concentrations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles child developmental study. Environmental Health Perspectives 108:257-263
11. Daniel JF, Dennis TB,, Lance TY, et al. 2003. Derivation of acute ecological risk criteria for chlorite in freshwater ecosystems. Water Research, 37:4359-4368.
12. ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment. Part II. Environmental Risk Assessment. Italy: European Chemicals Bureau, European Commission Joint Research Center.
13. Government of British Columbia, Environmental Quality Branch. 2001. Policy statements regarding water quality guidelines and objectives [EB/OL]. [2001-08-08]. http://www.env. gov. bc. ca/wat/wq/homesubs/policy.html
14. 50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. Water Research, 21:269-276.
15. Maltby L, Blake N, Brack TCM, et al. 2003. Using the species sensitivity approach for assessing the risk of pesticides: Implications of data selection and model choice. Solutions to Pollution: Program Abstract Book, Christchurch, New Zealand, September-October 2003. Christchurch, New Zealand: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Asia/Pacific-The Australasian Society of Ecotoxicology, 148.
16. Marsh MC. 1907. The effect of some industrial wastes on fishes//Water Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 192. US Geological Survey: 337-348.
17. NAS (National Academy of Science and National Academy of Engineering). 1974. Water Quality Criteria. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
18. NTAC (National Technical Advisory Committee to the Secretary of the Interior). 1968. Water Quality Criteria. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
19. Posthuma L, Suter II GW, Traas TP. 2002. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press LLC.
20. Powers EB. 1917. The goldfish (Carassius carassius) as a test animal in the study of toxicity. Illinois Biological Monographs, 4:1-73.
21. Schroeder HA, Mitchner M, Nasor AP. 1970. Zirconium, niobium, antimony, vanadium and lead in rats: Life term studies. Journal of Nutrition, 100:59-66.
22. Shao Q. 2000. Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC data: An alternative approach. Envirometrics, 11:583-595.
23. Shelford VE. 1917. An experimental study of the effects of gas wastes upon fishes, with especial reference to stream pollution. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History, 11:381-412.
24. USEPA. 1976. Quality Criteria for Water. Washington DC: National Technical Information Service.
25. USEPA. 1980a. Ambient Water Quality Criteria (series). Washington DC: Office of Regulation and Standard.
26. USEPA. 1980b. Guidelines and Methodology Used in the Preparation of Health Effect Assessment Chapters of the Consent Decree Water Criteria Documents. Washington DC: USE-PA.
27. USEPA. 1985. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Aquatic Life Criteria for Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. Washington DC: Office of Research and Development.
28. USEPA. 1986. Quality Criteria for Water. Washington DC: Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
29. USEPA. 1987. Integrated Risk Information System: Antimony (CASRN 7440-36-0) [EB/OL]. Washington DC: USE-PA, [(2002-12-03]). http://www.epa. gov/iris/subst/0006.htm.
30. USEPA. 1997. Terms of Environment: Glossary, Abbreviations and Acronyms [EB/OL]. [2006-10-02]. http://www.epa. gov/OCEPAterms/. USEPA. 1998a. Water Quality Criteria and Standards Plan: Priorities for Future. Washington DC: Office of Water.
31. USEPA. 1998b. Draft Water Quality Criteria Methodology: Human Health. Federal Register Notice. Washington DC: Office of water.
32. USEPA. 1999. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria: Correction. Washington DC: Office of Water.
33. USEPA. 2000. Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health. Washington DC: Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.
34. USEPA. 2001. Nutrient criteria development; Notice of ecoregional nutrient criteria [EB/OL]. Washington DC: USE-PA. [2009-01-14]. http://www.epa. gov/EPA-WATER/2001/January/Day-09/w569.htm.
35. USEPA. 2003a. National recommended water quality criteria for the protection of human health [EB/OL]. [2009-01-14]. http://www.epa. gov/EPA-WATER/2003/December/Day-31/w32211.htm
36. USEPA. 2003b. Strategy for Water Quality Standards and Criteria. Washington DC: Office of Water.
37. USEPA. 2003c. Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health. Technical Support Document Volume 2: Development of National Bioaccumulation Factors. Washington DC: Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.
38. USEPA. 2006. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology.
39. USEPA. 2008. Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health. Technical Support Document Volume 3: Development of Site-Specific Bioaccumulation Factors. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.
40. USEPA. 2009. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology.
41. van der Hoeven N. 2004. Current issues in statistics and models for ecotoxicological risk assessment. Acta Biotheor, 52:201-217.
42. van Straalen NM, van Rijn JP. 1998. Ecotoxicological risk assessment of soil fauna recovery from pesticide application. Review of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 154:85-141.
43. van Vlaardingen PLA, Verbruggen EMJ. 2007. Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the framework of 'International and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands' (INS). Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
44. Wagner C, Lokke H. 1991. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Research, 25:1237-1242.
45. WHO. 2008. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Incorporating 1st and 2nd Addenda, Vol. 1, Recommendations, 3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization.
46. Yin DQ, Hu SQ, Jin HJ, et al. 2003a. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China. Chemosphere, 52:67-73.
47. Yin DQ, Jin HJ, Yu LW, et al. 2003b. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2, 4-dichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China. Environmental Pollution, 122:217-222.