First evidences of sexual selection by mate choice in marine zooplankton

Oecologia

Volumn 164, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 627-635

  Ceballos, Sara ^a   Kiorboe, Thomas ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Copepods; Mate quality; Plankton; Size; Spermatophore production

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; CRUSTACEAN; EGG PRODUCTION; HERITABILITY; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MATE CHOICE; NEW RECORD; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COPEPOD; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERMATOGONIUM;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; COPEPODA; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SPERMATOGONIA;

ACARTIA TONSA; COPEPODA; METAZOA;

EID: 77958016879     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1755-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ali AK, Primicerio R, Folstad I, Liljedal S, Berge J (2009) Morphological correlates of mating frequency and clutch size in wild caught female Eudiaptomus graciloides (Copepoda: Calanoida). J Plankton Res 31: 389-397. doi: 10. 1093/plankt/fbn130.
2. Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University press, Princeton.
3. Aquiloni L, Gherardi F (2008) Mutual mate choice in crayfish: large body size is selected by both sexes, virginity by males only. J Zool 274: 171-179. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-7998. 2007. 00370. x.
4. Arendt KE, Jónasdóttir SH, Hasen PJ, Gartner S (2005) Effects of dietary fatty acids on the reproductive success of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornis. Mar Biol 146: 513-530. doi: 10. 1007/s00227-004-1457-9.
5. Bagøien E, Kiørboe T (2005) Blind dating-mate finding in planktonic copepods. III. Hydromechamical communication in Acartia tonsa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300: 129-133. doi: 10. 3354/meps300129.
6. Berggreen U, Hansen B, Kiørboe T (1988) Food size spectra, ingestion and growth of the copepod Acartia tonsa during development: implications for determination of copepod production. Mar Biol 99: 341-352. doi: 10. 1007/BF02112126.
7. Blades PI (1977) Mating behavior of Centropages typicus (Copepoda: Calanoida). Mar Biol 40: 57-64. doi: 10. 1007/BF00390628.
8. Boggs CL (1995) Male nuptial gifts: phenotypic consequences and evolutionary implications. In: Leather SR, Hardie J (eds) Insect reproduction. CRC, New York, pp 214-242.
9. Choi KH, Kimmerer WJ (2008) Mate limitation in an estuarine population of copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 53: 1656-1664.
10. Choi KH, Kimmerer WJ (2009) Mating success and its consequences for population growth in an estuarine copepod. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 377: 183-191. doi: 10. 3354/meps07819.
11. Doall MH, Colin SP, Stricker JR, Yen J (1998) Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 681-689.
12. Dutz J (1998) Repression of fecundity in the neritic copepod Acartia clausi exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium lusitanicum: relationship between feeding and egg production. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 175: 97-107. doi: 10. 3354/meps175097.
13. Gauld DT (1957) Copulation in calanoid copepods. Nature 180: 510. doi: 10. 1038/180510a0.
14. Heuch PA, Schram TA (1996) Male mate choice in a natural population of the parasitic copepod Lernaeocera branchialis (Copepoda: Pennellidae). Behaviour 133: 221-239.
15. Ianora A, Miralto A, Buttino I, Romano G, Poulet SA (1999) First evidence of some dinoflagellates reducing male copepod fertilization capacity. Limnol Oceanogr 44: 147-153.
16. Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Soc 7: 107-112.
17. Jersabek CD, Luger MS, Schabetsberger R, Grill S, Stricker JR (2007) Hang on or run? Copepod mating versus predation risk in contrasting environments. Oecologia 153: 761-773. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-007-0768-1.
18. Katajisto T, Viitasalo M, Koski M (1998) Seasonal occurrence and hatching of calanoid eggs in sediments of the northern Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163: 133-143. doi: 10. 3354/meps163133.
19. Kelly LS, Snell TW, Lonsdale DJ (1998) Chemical communication during mating of the harpacticoid Trigriopus japonicus. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 737-744. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 1998. 0239.
20. Kiørboe T (2006) Sex, sex-ratio, and the dynamics of pelagic copepod populations. Oecologia 148: 40-50. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-005-0346-3.
21. Kiørboe T (2007) Mate finding, mating, and population dynamics in a planktonic copepod Oithona davisae: there are too few males. Limnol Oceanogr 52: 1511-1522.
22. Kiørboe T (2008) A mechanistic approach to plankton ecology. Princeton University press, Princeton.
23. Kiørboe T, Bagøien E (2005) Motility patters and mate encounters rates in planktonic copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 50: 1999-2007.
24. Kiørboe T, Bagøien E, Thygesen U (2005) Blind dating-mate finding in planktonic copepods. II. The pheromone cloud of Pseudocalanus elongatus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300: 117-128. doi: 10. 3354/meps300117.
25. Kokko H, Mappes J (2005) Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59: 1976-1985.
26. Kokko H, Monaghan P (2001) Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol Lett 4: 159-165. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1461-0248. 2001. 00212. x.
27. Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Phil Trans R Soc B 361: 319-334. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2005. 1784.
28. Litchman E, Klausmeier CA, Schofield OM, Falkowski PG (2007) The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level. Ecol Lett 10: 1170-1181. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2007. 01117. x.
29. MacDiarmid AB, Butler MJ (1999) Sperm economy and limitation in spiny lobsters. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46: 14-24. doi: 10. 1007/s002650050587.
30. Maier G, Berger I, Burghard W, Nassal B (2000) Is mating of copepods associated with increased risk of predation? J Plankon Res 22: 1977-1987. doi: 10. 1093/plankt/22. 10. 1977.
31. Mauchline J (1998) The biology of calanoid copepods. Academic Press, London.
32. McLaren IA (1976) Inheritance of demographic and production parameters in marine copepod Eurytemora herdmani. Biol Bull 151: 200-213.
33. McLaren IA, Corkett CJ (1978) Unusual genetic variation in body size, developmental times, oil storage, and survivorship in marine copepod Pseudocalanus. Biol Bull 155: 347-359.
34. Ohtsuka S, Huys R (2001) Sexual dimorphism in calanoid copepods: morphology and function. Hydrobiologia 453/454: 441-466. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1013162605809.
35. Reading KL, Backweel PRY (2007) Can beggars be choosers? Male mate choice in a fiddler crab. Animal Behav 74: 867-872. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2006. 09. 025.
36. Sato T, Goshima S (2007) Female choice in response to risk of sperm limitation by the stone crab, Hapalogaster dentate. Animal Behav 73: 331-338. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2006. 05. 016.
37. Sato T, Ashidate M, Wada S, Goshima S (2005) Effects of male mating frequency and male size on ejaculate size and reproductive success of female spiny king crab Paralithodes brevipes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296: 251-262. doi: 10. 3354/meps296251.
38. Sato T, Yoseda K, Abe O, Shibuno T (2008) Male maturity, number of sperm, and spermatophore size relationships in the coconut crab Birgus latro on Hatoma Island, southern Japan. J Crustacean Biol 28: 663-668. doi: 10. 1651/07-2966. 1.
39. Savelli UD, Fox CW (1998) Sexual selection and the fitness consequences of male body size in the seed beetle Stator limbatus. Animal Behav 55: 473-483.
40. Schnack SB (1978) Seasonal change of zooplankton in Kiel Bay. III. Calanoid copepods. Kiel Meeresforsch 4: 201-209.
41. Shuster SM (2007) The evolution of crustacean mating systems. In: evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Strickler JR (1998) Observing free-swimming copepods mating. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 671-680. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 1998. 0233.
43. Strickler JR, Balászi G (2007) Planktonic copepods reacting selectively to hydrodynamic disturbances. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 1947-1950. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2007. 2080.
44. Titelman J, Varpe Ø, Eliassen S, Fiksen Ø (2007) Copepod mating: chance or choice? J Plankton Res 29: 1023-1030. doi: 10. 1093/plankt/fbm076.
45. Tsuda A, Miller CB (1998) Mate-finding behaviour in Calanus marshallae. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 713-720. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 1998. 0237.
46. Uchima M (1985) Copulation in the marine copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi. 1. Mate discrimination. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn 32: 23-30.
47. Uye S-I (1985) Resting egg production as a life history strategy of marine planktonic copepods. Bull Mar Sci 37: 440-449.
48. Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73: 43-78. doi: 10. 1017/S0006323197005112.
49. van der Veen IT (2003) Is body size or activity of copepods related to ingestion of parasite larvae? Parasitology 126: 173-178. doi: 10. 1017/S0031182002002652.
50. Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold: "the sexy son hypothesis". Am Nat 113: 201. doi: 10. 1086/283379.
51. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 313-318. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(02)02533-8.
52. Wilson DF, Parrish KK (1971) Remating in a planktonic copepod. Mar Biol 9: 202-204. doi: 10. 1007/BF00351379.
53. Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435-447.