Deriving the aquatic predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) of three chlorophenols for the Taihu Lake, China

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

Volumn 45, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1823-1831

  Lei, Bing L ^a,b   Huang, Sheng B ^a   Jin, Xiao W ^a   Wang, Zijian ^a  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

assessment factor; Chlorophenols; eco toxicological model; predicted no effect concentration (PNEC); species sensitivity distribution; Taihu Lake

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT FACTOR; CHLOROPHENOLS; ECO-TOXICOLOGICAL MODEL; PREDICTED NO-EFFECT CONCENTRATIONS; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; TAIHU LAKES;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ECOLOGY; LAKES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

PHENOLS;

2,4 DICHLOROPHENOL; 2,4,6 TRICHLOROPHENOL; CHLOROPHENOL; PENTACHLOROPHENOL;

ANALYTIC METHOD; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; CHINA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; LAKE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; TOXICITY TESTING; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALS; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CHINA; CHLOROPHENOLS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 77958007493     PISSN: 10934529     EISSN: 15324117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2010.520495     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdullah, M. D.; Nainggolan, H. Phenolic water pollutants in a Malaysian river basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1991, 19, 423-431.
2. Stangroom, S. J.; Collins, C. D.; Lester, J. N. Sources of organic micropollutants to lowland rivers. Environ. Technol. 1998, 19, 643-666.
3. Hahn, D.; Cozzolino, A.; Piccolo, A.; Armenante, P. M. Reduction of 2, 4-dichlorophenol toxicity to Pseudomonas putida after oxidative incubation with humic substances and a biomimetic catalyst. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 66, 335-342.
4. Yin, D. Q.; Hu, S. Q.; Jin, H. J.; Yu, L. W. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China. Chemosphere 2003, 52, 67-73.
5. Yin, D. Q.; Jin, H. J.; Yu, L. W.; Hu, S. Q. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2, 4-dichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122, 217-222.
6. Xia, Q.; Chen, Y. Q.; Liu, X. B. Environmental quality standards for Chinese surface water. Water quality criteria and standards. Standard Press in China: Beijing, 2004;1-110.
7. Gao, J. J.; Liu, L. H.; Liu, X. R.; Zhou, H. D.; Huang, S. B.; Wang, Z. J. Levels and spatial distribution of chlorophenols-2, 4-Dichlorophenol, 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol, and pentachlorophenol in surface water of China. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1181-1187.
8. Crane, M.; Sorokin, N.; Wheeler, J.; Grosso, A.; Whitehouse, P.; Morritt, D. European approaches to coastal and estuarine risk assessment. In Coastal and Estuarine Risk Assessment; Newman, M. C.; Roberts, Jr. M. H.; Hale, R. C., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: London, 2001;15-39.
9. De Laender, F.; De Schamphelaere, K. A. C.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Janssen, C. R. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 310-315.
10. European Commission. Final report on the ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Adopted by the scientific steering committee at its meeting of 6-7 March, 2003, 11pp.
11. Aldenberg, T.; Slob, W. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on log-logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1993, 25, 48-63.
12. Pennington, D. W. Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 56, 238-250.
13. Brain, R. A.; Sanderson, H.; Sibley, P. K.; Solomon, K. R. Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment: Evaluating pharmaceutical effects on aquatic higher plants as an example. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2006, 64, 128-135.
14. Solomon, K. R.; Baker, D. B.; Richards, R. P.; Dixon, K. R.; Klaine, S. J.; La Point, T. W.; Kendall, R. J.; Weisskopf, C. P.; Giddings, J. M.; Giesy, J. P.; Hall, Jr. L. W.; Williams, W. M. Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in north American surface waters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 31-76.
15. Giesy, J. P.; Solmon, K. R.; Coates, J. R.; Dixon, K. R.; Giddings, J. M.; Kenaga, E. E. Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1999, 160, 1-129.
16. Campbell, K. R.; Bartell, S. M.; Shaw, J. L. Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquatdibromide case study. II. Approaches using quotients and distributions. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19, 760-774.
17. Forbes, T. L.; Forbes, V. E. A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology. Funct. Ecol. 1993, 7, 249-254.
18. Smith, E. P.; Cairns, Jr. J. Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: Statistical and ecological concerns. Ecotoxicology, 1993, 2, 203-219.
19. Forbes, V. E.; Callow, P. Species sensitivity distributions revisited: A critical appraisal. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2002, 8, 473-492.
20. Selck, H.; Riemann, B.; Christoffersen, K.; Forbes, V. E.; Gustavson, K.; Hansen, B. W.; Jacobsen, J. A.; Kusk, O. K.; Petersen, S. Comparing Sensitivity of Ecotoxicological effect endpoints between laboratory and field. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2002, 52, 97-112.
21. Natio, W.; Miyamoto, K.; Nakanishi, J.; Masunaga, S.; Bartell, S. M. Evaluation of an ecosystem model in ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Chemosphere, 2003, 53, 363-375.
22. De Schamphelaere, K. A. C.; Janssen, C. R. Development and field validation of a biotic ligand model predicting chronic copper toxicity to Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol. 2004, 23, 1365-1375.
23. Ke, R. H.; Luo, J. P.; Sun, L. W.; Wang, Z. J.; Philip, A. S. Predicting bioavailability and accumulation of organochlorine pesticides to Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) in the presence of humic acid and natural organic matter using passive sampling membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6698-6703.
24. Heugens, E. H. W.; Hendriks, A. J.; Dekker, T.; Van Straalen, N. M.; Admiraal, W. A review of the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic organisms and analysis of uncertainty factors for use in risk assessment. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2001, 31, 247-284.
25. Joern, A.; Hoagland, K. D. In defense of whole-community bioassays for risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 407-409.
26. Juttner, I.; Peither, A.; Lay, J. P.; Kettrup, A.; Ormerod, S. J. An outdoor mesocosm study to assess ecotoxicological effects of atrazine on a natural plankton community. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1995, 29, 435-441.
27. Boxall, A. B. A.; Brown, C. D.; Barrett, K. L. Higher-tier laboratory methods for assessing the aquatic toxicity of pesticides. Pest Manage. Sci. 2002, 58, 637-648.
28. Pablo, F.; Krassoi, F. R.; Jones, P. R. F.; Colville, A. E.; Hose, G. C.; Lim, R. P. Comparison of the fate and toxicity of chlorpyrifos-Laboratory versus a coastal mesocosm system. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 71, 219-229.
29. Daam, M. A.; Van den Brink, P.; Nogueira, A. J. A. Comparison of fate and ecological effects of the herbicide linuron in freshwater model ecosystems between tropical and temperate regions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 424-433.
30. Naito, W.; Miyamoto, K.; Nakanishi, J.; Shigeki, M.; Bartell, S. M. Application of an ecosystem model for aquatic ecological risk assessment of chemicals for a Japanese Lake. Water Res. 2002, 36, 1-14.
31. Campbell, K. R.; Bartell, S. M. Ecological models and ecological risk assessment. In Risk Assessment: Logic and Measurement; Newman; M. C.; Strojan, C. L., Eds.; Ann Arbor Press: Chelsea, MI, 1998;69-100.
32. Park, R. A.; Clough, J. S.; Wellman, M. C. AQUATOX: Modeling environmental fate and ecological effects in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 2008, 213, 1-15.
33. Sourisseau, S.; Bassères, A.; Périé, F.; Caquet, T. Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of an ecosystem model applied to artificial streams. Water Res. 2008, 42, 1167-1181.
34. Lei, B. L.; Huang, S. B.; Qiao, M.; Li, T. Y.; Wang, Z. J. Prediction of the environmental fate and aquatic ecological impact of nitrobenzene in the Songhua River using modified AQUATOX model. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 769-777.
35. Maltby, L.; Blake, N.; Brock, T. C. M.; Van den Brink, P. J. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 379-388.
36. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD environment monographs 92, Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment. OECD Environment Directorate, Environmental Health and Safety Division, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. OECD/GD (95) 18, 1995, 34-35.
37. Scheringer, M.; Steinbach, D.; Escher, B.; Hungerbühler, K. Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals what are the benefits and limitations? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2002, 9, 307-314.
38. Hammers-Wirtz, M.; Ratte, H. T. Offspring fitness in Daphnia: Is the Daphnia reproduction test appropriate for extrapolating effects on the population level? Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19, 1856-1866.
39. Wheeler, J. R.; Grist, E. P. M.; Leung, K. M. Y.; Morritt, D.; Crane, M. Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2002, 45, 192-202.
40. Wagner, C.; Lokke, H. Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data. Water Res. 1991, 25, 1237-1242.
41. Park, R. A.; Clough, J. S. AQUATOX for windows: A modular fate and effects model for aquatic ecosystems-volume 2: Technical Documentation. Chapter 4: Biota. Office of Science and Technology: Washington, DC 20460. EPA-823-R-04-002, 2004, 1-44.
42. De Laender, F.; De Schamphelaere, K. A. C.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Janssen, C. R. Is ecosystem structure the target of concern in ecological effect assessments? Water Res. 2008, 42, 2395-2402.
43. Moore, D. R. J.; Caux, P. Y. Estimating low toxic effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16, 794-801.
44. USEPA. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. Risk Assessment Forum: Washington, DC 20460. EPA/630/R-97/001, 1997, 1-39.
45. Sun, H. L. The ecosystem of China. The part IV: The aquatic ecosystem of China, Science Press: Beijing, 2005;798-825.
46. Pesticide Action Network. PAN pesticides database-chemical toxicity studies on aquatic organisms. www.Pesticideinfo.org/Search-Ecotoxicity. Jsp#Chemicals, 2006.
47. Barnthouse, L. W. Quantifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 500-508.
48. Lei, B. L.; Jin, X. W.; Huang, S. B.; Wang, Z. J. Discussion of quality criteria for three chlorophenols in Taihu Lake. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. (in Chinese) 2009, 4, 105-113.
49. Land Recycling Program, Chemical and physical properties database. www.dep. state.pa.us/physicalproperties/CPP-search.htm (2001).
50. Lee, Y. G.; Hwang, S. H.; Kim, S. D. Predicting the toxicity of substituted phenols to aquatic species and its changes in the stream and effluent waters. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 50, 213-219.
51. Qin, B. Q.; Hu, W. P.; Gao, G.; Luo, L. C.; Zhang, J. S. The dynamics of resuspension and conceptual mode of nutrient release from sediments in large shallow lake Taihu, China. Chinese Sci. Bull. 2004, 49, 54-64.
52. Zhang, D. W.; Xie, P.; Liu, Y. Q.; Chen, J.; Wen, Z. R. Spatial and temporal variations of microcystins in hepatopancreas of a freshwater snail from Lake Taihu. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 466-472.
53. Schmitt-Jansen, M.; Veit, U.; Dudel, G.; Altenburger, R. An ecological perspective in aquatic ecotoxicology: Approaches and challenges. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2008, 9, 337-345.