Ability-training-oriented automated assessment in introductory programming course

Computers and Education

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 220-226

  Wang, Tiantian ^a   Su, Xiaohong ^a   Ma, Peijun ^a   Wang, Yuying ^a   Wang, Kuanquan ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Intelligent tutoring systems; Interactive learning environments; Programming and programming languages

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT MECHANISM; ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATED LEARNING; C PROGRAMMING; DYNAMIC TESTING; HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING COURSE; NOVICE PROGRAMMER; PROGRAMMING AND PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PROGRAMMING SKILLS; STUDENTS' LEARNING EXPERIENCES; TEACHING STAFF;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; TESTING;

TEACHING;

EID: 77957994723     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. K. Ala-Mutka A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments Computer Science Education 16 2 2005 83 102
2. M. Blumenstein, S. Green, S. Fogelman, A. Nguyen, and V. Muthukkumarasamy Performance analysis of GAME: a generic automated marking environment Computers & Education 50 2008 1203 1216
3. C. Brenda, K. Andy, L. Andrew, and O.W. Chong On automated grading of programming assignments in an academic institution Computers and Education 41 2003 121 131
4. C. Daly, and J.M. Horgan An automated learning system for Java programming IEEE Transactions on Education 47 2004 10 17
5. Ellsworth, C. E., Fenwick, J. B., & Kurtz, B. L. (2004). The Quiver system. In: Proc. 35th SIGCSE Technical Symp. on Computer Science Education, (Virginia, 2004) pp. 205-209.
6. C.A. Higgins, G. Gray, P. Symeonidis, and A. Tsintsifas Automated assessment and experiences of teaching programming ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 5 5 2005 1 21
7. M. Joy, N. Griffiths, and R. Boyatt The boss online submission and assessment system ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing 5 2 2005 1 28
8. Khirulnizam, A. R., & Md, J. N. (2007). A review on the static analysis approach in the automated programming assessment systems. In: National Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, (Pahang, Malaysia, 2007).
9. Khirulnizam, A. R., Syarbaini, A., & Md, J. N. (2007). The design of an automated C programming assessment using pseudo-code comparison technique. In: National Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, (Pahang, Malaysia, 2007).
10. Morris, D. S. (2003). Automatic grading of student's programming assignments: an interactive process and suit of programs. In: Conf. 33rd Annu. Frontiers in Education, (Boulder, 2003), pp. 1-6.
11. Norshuhani, Z., Emy, E. M., Savita, K. S., Mazlina, M., Ellia, A. (2006). Development of a web-based automated grading system for programming assignments using static analysis approach. In: International Conference on Electrical and Informatics, (Bandung, Indonesia, 2006).
12. K.A. Reek The TRY system -or- how to avoid testing student programs SIGCSE Bulletin 21 1 1989 112 116
13. Saikkonen R., Malmi L., & Korhonen, A. (2001). Fully automatic assessment of programming exercises. In: Proc. 6th Annu. Conf. on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, (Canterbury, 2001) pp. 133-136.
14. Truong, N., Roe, P., & Bancroft, P. (2005). Automated feedback for "fill in the gap" programming exercises. In: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Computing Education Conference, (Newcastle, Australia, 2005) pp. 117-126.
15. T.T. Wang, X.H. Su, Y.Y. Wang, and P.J. Ma Semantic similarity-based grading of student programs Information and Software Technology 49 2007 99 107