Modeling the Protagonist: The Strategic Use of Discourse Voices

Argumentation

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 475-487

  Van den Hoven, Paul ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Causality; Dialectical discussion; Protagonist; Rhetorical strategy; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957991796     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-010-9189-0     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Houtlosser, P. 1995. Standpunten in een kritische discussie. Dissertation UvA. IFOTT Studies in language use 22.
2. Pit, M. 2006. Determining subjectivity in text: The case of backward causal connectives in Dutch. In: Discourse Processes 41: 151-174.
3. Spooren, W., and J. Jaspers. 1990. Tekstoperaties en tekstperspectieven. Gramma/TTT 14: 195-220.
4. Stukker, N. 2005. Causal marking across levels of language structure. A cognitive semantic analysis of causal verbs and causal connectives in Dutch. Diss. Universiteit Utrecht. Utrecht: LOT.
5. Sweetser, E. E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantics structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. In: Cognitive Science 12: 49-100.
7. van den Hoven, P. J. 2006. Causale connectieven in argumentatietheoretisch perspectief. Taalbeheersing 28(4): 302-323.
8. van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.
9. van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 2000. Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. Argumentation 14(3): 293-305.
10. Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.